Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 43-69

  Reppa, Irene ^a   Schmidt, William C ^b   Leek, E Charles ^c  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SR Research   (Canada)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Facilitation; IOR; Object based; Selective attention; Space based

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MOTIVATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; SENSORY GATING;

ATTENTION; CUES; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTIVATION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SENSORY GATING; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84856171564     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0211-x     Document Type: Review

References (160)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 3. 467.
2. Abrams, R. A., & Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833. doi: 10. 3758/BF03206925.
3. Andersen, G. J. (1990). Focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 112-120.
4. Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. (1993). Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 658-667.
5. Ariga, A., Yokosawa, K., & Ogawa, H. (2007). Object-based attentional selection and awareness of objects. Visual Cognition, 15, 685-709.
6. Arnott, S. R., & Shedden, J. M. (2000). Attention switching in depth using random-dot autostereograms: Attention gradient asymmetries. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1459-1473. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212146.
7. Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. (2001). Object and space-based attentional selection in three-dimensional space. Visual Cognition, 8, 1-32.
8. Avrahami, J. (1999). Object of attention, objects of perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1604-1612. doi: 10. 3758/BF03213121.
9. Awh, E., Dhaliwal, H., Christensen, S., & Matsukura, M. (2001). Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychological Science, 12, 329-334.
10. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effects of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212239.
11. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 351-375). Cambridge: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
12. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Attention accesses multiple references frames: Evidence from unilateral neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 83-101.
13. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011-1036. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 24. 4. 1011.
14. Bennett, P. J., & Pratt, J. (2001). The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 12, 76-80. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00313.
15. Berlucchi, G., Tassinari, G., Marzi, C. A., & Di Stefano, M. (1989). Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effects of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets. Neuropsychologia, 27, 201-221. doi: 10. 1016/0028-3932(89)90172-3.
16. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 94. 2. 115.
17. Bourke, P. A., Partridge, H., & Pollux, P. M. J. (2006). Additive effects of inhibiting attention to objects and locations in three-dimensional displays. Visual Cognition, 13, 643-654. doi: 10. 1080/13506280544000309.
18. Brawn, P. T., & Snowden, R. J. (2000). Attention to overlapping objects: Detection and discrimination of luminance changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 342-358.
19. Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
20. Brown, J. M., & Denney, H. I. (2007). Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 606-618.
21. Cave, K. R., & Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 204-223. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212327.
22. Chen, Z. (1998). Switching attention within and between objects: The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 7-16.
23. Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2006). Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 992-1003. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193360.
24. Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2008). Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1435-1443. doi: 10. 3758/PP. 70. 8. 1435.
25. Christ, S. E., McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2002). Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 80-85. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196258.
26. Conci, M., & Müller, H. J. (2009). The "beam of darkness": Spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1725-1738.
27. de Gonzaga Gawryszewski, L., Riggio, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1987). Movements of attention in three spatial dimensions and the meaning of "neutral" cues. Neuropsychologia, 25, 19-29. doi: 10. 1016/0028-3932(87)90040-6.
28. de-Wit, L. H., Kentridge, R. W., & Milner, A. D. (2009). Object-based attention and visual area LO. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1483-1490. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2008. 11. 002.
29. Downing, C., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
30. Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
31. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 113, 501-517. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 113. 4. 501.
32. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 123, 161-177. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 123. 2. 161.
33. Egly, R., & Homa, D. (1991). Reallocation of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 142-159.
34. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psychological Science, 1, 323-326. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 1990. tb00227. x.
35. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. doi: 10. 3758/BF03203267.
36. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
37. Eriksen, C. W., & St James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240. doi: 10. 3758/BF03211502.
38. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 11. 5. 583.
39. Filoteo, J. V., Delis, D. C., Salmon, D. P., Demadura, T., Roman, M. J., & Shults, C. W. (1997). An examination of the nature of attentional deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease: Evidence from a spatial orienting task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 337-347.
40. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339. doi: 10. 3758/BF03207603.
41. Goldsmith, M. (1998). What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 127, 189-219. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 127. 2. 189.
42. Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 897-918.
43. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations. Psychological Review, 101, 470-489. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 101. 3. 470.
44. Haimson, C., & Behrmann, M. (2001). Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 496-503.
45. Han, S., Wan, X., Wang, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Shifts of spatial attention in perceived 3-D space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 753-764.
46. He, Z., & Nakayama, K. (1995). Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 11155-11159.
47. Hecht, L. N., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Attentional selection of complex objects: Joint effects of surface uniformity and part structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1205-1211. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193114.
48. Ho, M. C., & Atchley, P. (2009). Perceptual load modulates object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1661-1669.
49. Hollingworth, A., Maxcey-Richard, A. M., Vecera, S. P. (2011). The spatial distribution of attention within and across objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi: 10. 1037/a0024463.
50. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego: Academic.
51. Hsieh, S., Lee, C. Y., Hwang, W. J., & Tsai, J. J. (1997). Object-based and location-based shifting of attention in Parkinson's disease. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 1315-1325.
52. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1994). Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 207-241. doi: 10. 1080/02643299408251974.
53. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 283-311. doi: 10. 1080/02643299508252000.
54. Iani, C., Nicoletti, R., Rubichi, S., & Umiltà, C. (2001). Shifting attention between objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 157-164.
55. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 504-509.
56. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Spread of inhibition across an object's surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 495-507.
57. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O.
58. Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1046-1054. doi: 10. 3758/BF03207612.
59. Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431. doi: 10. 1038/334430a0.
60. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147. doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2.
61. Klein, R. M., Christie, J., & Morris, E. (2005). Vector averaging of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 295-300.
62. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00166.
63. Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science, 293, 1506-1509. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1061133.
64. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
65. Kramer, A. F., Webber, T. A. & Watson, S. E. (1997). Object-based attentional selection -grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: Comment on Vecera and Farah (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 3-13.
66. Kravitz, D. J., & Behrmann, M. (2008). The space of an object: Object attention alters the spatial gradient in the surround. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 298-309.
67. Kwak, H. W., & Egeth, H. E. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 455-464.
68. LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371-379. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 9. 3. 371.
69. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 96. 1. 101.
70. Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52-66.
71. Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (2000). Object features, object locations, and object files: Which does selective attention activate and when? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1387-1400. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 4. 1387.
72. Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251. doi: 10. 3758/BF03207556.
73. Law, M. B., & Abrams, R. A. (2002). Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1017-1027.
74. Leek, E. C., Reppa, I., & Arguin, M. (2005). The structure of 3D object shape representations: Evidence from whole-part matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 668-684.
75. Leek, E. C., Reppa, I., & Tipper, S. P. (2003). Inhibition of return for objects and locations in static displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 388-395.
76. List, A., & Robertson, L. C. (2007). Inhibition of return and object-based attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1322-1334.
77. Macquistan, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512-515.
78. Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., et al. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 8135-8139.
79. Mari-Beffa, P., Houghton, G., Estevez, A. F., & Fuentes, L. J. (2000). Word-based grouping affects the prime-task effect on semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 469-479.
80. Marino, A. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The role of closure in defining the "objects" of object-based attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1140-1149.
81. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
82. Marrara, M. T., & Moore, C. M. (2003). Object-based selection in the two-rectangles method is not an artefact of the three-sided directional cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1103-1109.
83. Martínez, A., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Vazquez, M., Molholm, S., Foxe, J. J., Javitt, D. C., et al. (2006). Objects are highlighted by spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 298-310. doi: 10. 1162/089892906775783642.
84. Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
85. Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777-787. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 11. 6. 777.
86. McAuliffe, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2006). Object- and location-based inhibition of return in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 406-410.
87. McAuliffe, J., Pratt, J., & O'Donnell, C. (2001). Examining location-based and object-based components of inhibition in static displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1072-1082.
88. McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention. Psychology and Aging, 16, 437-449. doi: 10. 1037/0882-7974. 16. 3. 437.
89. Mevorach, C., Humphreys, G. W., & Shalev, L. (2006). Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 740-742.
90. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00019.
91. Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782-784. doi: 10. 1126/science. 4023713.
92. Mozer, M. C. (2002). Frames of reference in unilateral neglect and visual perception: A computational perspective. Psychological Review, 109, 156-185.
93. Mozer, M. C., & Vecera, S. P. (2005). Object- and space-based attention. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 130-134). New York: Elsevier.
94. Müller, H. J., & O'Grady, R. B. (2009). Object-based selection operating on a spatial representation made salient by dimensional segmentation mechanisms: A re-investigation of Egly and Homa (1984). Psychological Research, 73, 271-286.
95. Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 224-249.
96. Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591-1605. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 5. 1591.
97. Müller, N. G., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2003). Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9812-9816.
98. O'Grady, R. B., & Müller, H. J. (2000). Object-based selection operates on a grouped array of locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1655-1667.
99. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25. doi: 10. 1080/00335558008248231.
100. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
101. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228. doi: 10. 1080/02643298508252866.
102. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 109, 160-174. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 109. 2. 160.
103. Possin, K. L., Cagigas, X. E., Strayer, D. L., & Filoteo, J. V. (2006). Lack of impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease on an object-based negative priming task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102, 219-230.
104. Possin, K. L., Filoteo, J. V., Song, D. D., & Salmon, D. P. (2009). Space-based but not object-based inhibition of return is impaired in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1694-1700.
105. Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (1999). Examining the effects of practice on inhibition of return in static displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 756-765.
106. Pratt, J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2001). The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 721-727.
107. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80, 127-158. doi: 10. 1016/S0010-0277(00)00156-6.
108. Rensink, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
109. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 102. 1. 101.
110. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505.
111. Reppa, I., Fougnie, D., & Schmidt, W. C. (2010). How does attention spread across objects oriented in depth? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 912-925. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 4. 912.
112. Reppa, I., & Leek, E. C. (2003). The modulation of inhibition of return by object-internal structure: Implications for theories of object-based attentional selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 493-502. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196512.
113. Reppa, I., & Leek, E. C. (2006). Structure-based modulation of inhibition of return is triggered by object-internal but not occluding shape features. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1857-1866. doi: 10. 1080/17470210600872113.
114. Reuter-Lorenz, P., Drain, M., & Hardy-Morais, C. (1996). Object-centered attentional biases in the normal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 540-550.
115. Richard, A., Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2008). Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 842-853.
116. Ro, T., & Rafal, R. D. (1999). Components of reflexive visual orienting to moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 826-836.
117. Robertson, L. C. (2004). Space, objects, minds and brains. New York: Psychology.
118. Robertson, L. C., & Kim, M.-S. (1999). Effects of perceived space on spatial attention. Psychological Science, 10, 76-79. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00110.
119. Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 897-906.
120. Schendel, K. L., Robertson, L. C., & Treisman, A. (2001). Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 577-594. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194423.
121. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46. doi: 10. 1016/S0010-0277(00)00152-9.
122. Scholl, B. J., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Feldman, J. (2001). What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition, 80, 159-177. doi: 10. 1016/S0010-0277(00)00157-8.
123. Sekuler, A. B., & Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 121, 95-111. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 121. 1. 95.
124. Shomstein, S., & Behrmann, M. (2008). Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 132-144. doi: 10. 3758/PP. 70. 1. 132.
125. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 247-253. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196566.
126. Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., & McLean, J. P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 522-526.
127. Snyder, J. J., Schmidt, W. C., & Kingstone, A. (2001). Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1420-1432. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 27. 6. 1420.
128. Soto, D., & Blanco, M. J. (2004). Spatial attention and object-based attention: A comparison within a single task. Vision Research, 44, 69-81.
129. Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927-934. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212078.
130. Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (1996). Location versus feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36, 2125-2140.
131. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vision Research, 34, 179-189. doi: 10. 1016/0042-6989(94)90330-1.
132. Tassinari, G., & Berlucchi, G. (1993). Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes. Vision Research, 33, 1525-1534.
133. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1639-1656. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 5. 1639.
134. Theeuwes, J., Mathôt, S., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Object-based eye movements: The eyes prefer to stay within the same object. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 597-601. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 3. 597.
135. Theeuwes, J., & Pratt, J. (2003). Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 616-620.
136. Tipper, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1261-1278.
137. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 16. 3. 492.
138. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298. doi: 10. 1080/14640749108400971.
139. Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19-25.
140. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H., & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 50-60.
141. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 3. 478.
142. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Rafal, R., Starrveldt, Y., Ro, T., Egly, R., et al. (1997). Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1522-1532. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 23. 5. 1522.
143. Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194-214.
144. Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523-530.
145. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
146. Umiltà, C., Castiello, U., Fontana, M., & Vestri, A. (1995). Object-centred orienting of attention. Visual Cognition, 2, 165-181. doi: 10. 1080/13506289508401729.
147. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 123, 316-320. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 123. 3. 316.
148. Vecera, S. P., Behrmann, M., & Filapek, J. (2001). Attending to the parts of a single object: Part-based selection limitations. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 308-321. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194471.
149. Vecera, S. P., Behrmann, M., & McGoldrick, J. (2000). Selective attention to the parts of an object. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 301-308. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212985.
150. Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 123, 146-160. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 123. 2. 146.
151. Vivas, A. B., Humphreys, G. W., & Fuentes, L. J. (2008). Object-based inhibition of return in patients with posterior parietal damage. Neuropsychology, 22, 169-176.
152. Wang, Z., & Klein, R. M. (2010). Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: A review. Vision Research, 50, 220-228. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2009. 11. 013.
153. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946-962.
154. Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31-49. doi: 10. 3758/BF03211947.
155. Weaver, B., Lupiáñez, J., & Watson, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 993-1003. doi: 10. 3758/BF03211934.
156. Weger, U. W., Al-Aidroos, N., & Pratt, J. (2008). Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian. Psychological Research, 72, 176-182.
157. Wolfe, J. M., & Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43. doi: 10. 1016/S0042-6989(96)00111-3.
158. Wolfe, J. M., & Pokorny, C. W. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357-362. doi: 10. 3758/BF03206686.
159. Wright, M. J., Burns, R. J., Geffen, G. M., & Geffen, L. B. (1990). Covert orientation of visual attention in Parkinson's disease: An impairment in the maintenance of attention. Neuropsychologia, 28, 151-159.
160. Zimba, L. D., & Hughes, H. C. (1987). Distractor-target interactions during directed visual attention. Spatial Vision, 2, 117-149.