Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1420-1432

  Snyder, Janice J ^d   Schmidt, William C ^a,b   Kingstone, Alan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ATTENTION; CUES; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85047685539     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1420     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berlucchi, G., Tassinari, G., Marzi, C. A., & DiStefano, M. (1989). Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets. Neuropsychologia, 27, 201-221.
2. Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1024-1037.
3. Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1467-1475.
4. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Klein, R. (1988, August 4). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
6. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
7. Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
9. Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
10. Myers, J. L., & Well, A. D. (1995). Research design and statistical analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
12. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
14. Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1999). Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 229-242.
15. Pratt, J., Spalek, T. M., & Bradshaw, F. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 730-746.
16. Remington, R. W. (1980). Attention and saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 726-744.
17. Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
18. Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (in press). Inhibition of return at multiple locations: When you see it and when you don't. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A).
19. Tassinari, G., Biscaldi, M., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1989). Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. Acta Psychologica, 70, 267-291.
20. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.