Attention accesses multiple reference frames: Evidence from visual neglect

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 83-101

  Behrmann, Marlene ^a   Tipper, Steven P ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHRONIC BRAIN DISEASE; FEMALE; HEMIANOPIA; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; BRAIN DAMAGE, CHRONIC; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0033069411     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.83     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. Albert, M. L. (1973). A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23, 658-664.
3. Andersen, R. A., Essick, G. K., & Siegel, R. M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230, 456-458.
4. Andersen, R. A., & Mountcastle, V. B. (1983). The influence of the angle of gaze upon the excitability of the light-sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 3, 532-548.
5. Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 20, 303-330.
6. Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Li, C-S., & Stricanne, B. (1993). Coordinate transformations in the representation of spatial information. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 3, 171-176.
7. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.
8. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451-470.
9. Baylis, G. C., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1993). Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(4), 453-466.
10. Behrmann, M., & Moscovitch, M. (1994). Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: Effects of left-right coordinates of objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 1-16.
11. Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., Black, S. E., & Mozer, M. (1990). Perceptual and conceptual factors in neglect dyslexia: Two contrasting case studies. Brain, 113(4), 1163-1883.
12. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 351-375). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal subjects and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
14. Bisiach, E., Capitani, E., & Porta, E. (1985). Two basic properties of space representation in the brain. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 48, 141-144.
15. Bisiach, E., & Vallar, G. (1988). Hemineglect in humans. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 1, pp. 195-222). New York: Elsevier Science, Biomedical Division (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
16. Black, S. E., Ebert, P., Leibovitch, F., Szalai, J., Blair, N., & Bondar, J. (1994). Recovery in hemispatial neglect. Neurology, 45, A178.
17. Black, S. E., Vu, B., Martin, D., & Szalai, J. P. (1990). Evaluation of a bedside battery for hemispatial neglect in acute stroke [Abstract]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 102.
18. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception & communication. London: Pergamon Press.
19. Broadbent, D. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake information. Acta Psychologica, 50, 253-290.
20. Brotchie, P. R., Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., & Goodman, S. J. (1995). Head position signals used by parietal neurons to encode locations of visual stimuli. Nature, 375, 232-235.
21. Bushnell, M. C., Goldberg, M. E., & Robinson, D. L. (1981). Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex: I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 755-771.
22. Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Montgomery, M. W., & Farah, M. J. (1996). Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia, 34(2), 113-126.
23. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990a). Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13(516), 391-446.
24. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990b). Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature, 346, 267-269.
25. Cohen, J. D., Romero, R. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Mechanisms of spatial attention: The relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(4), 377-387.
26. Colby, C. L. (1996). A neurophysiological distinction between attention and intention. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance VXI (pp. 157-177). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Colby, C. L. (1998). Action-oriented spatial references frames in cortex. Neuron, 20, 15-24.
28. Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 319-350.
29. Costello, A. D., & Warrington, E. K. (1987). The dissociation of visual neglect and neglect dyslexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 50, 1110-1116.
30. Critchley, M. (1953). The parietal lobes. London: Hafner Press.
31. Cubelli, R., Nichelli, P., Bonito, V., Tanti, A. D., & Inzhagi, M. (1991). Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 15, 139-159.
32. D'Erme, P., Robertson, I., Bartolomeo, P., Daniele, A., & Gainotti, G. (1992). Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect. Neuropsychologia, 30(11), 989-1000.
33. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-197.
34. Pellegrino, G., Basso, G., & Frassinetti, F. (1997). Spatial extinction on double asynchronous stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1215-1223.
35. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448-456.
36. Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., Goodrich, S., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Axis-based neglect of visual shape. Neuropsychologia, 32(11), 1353-1365.
37. Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., & Rafal, R. (1992). Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature, 360, 73-75.
38. Driver, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centered coordinates: An affirmative study. Cognitive Neuropsycholoey, 8, 475-496.
39. Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992). The updating of representations of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science, 225, 90-92.
40. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
41. Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance VXI (pp. 549-578). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
43. Duncker, K. (1929). Induced motion. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 161-172). New York: Humanities Press.
44. Egeth, H., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
45. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
46. Egly, R., Rafal, R., Driver, J., & Starrveld, Y. (1994). Covert attention in the split brain reveals specialization for object-based attention. Psychological Science, 5(6), 380-383.
47. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
48. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
49. Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
50. Farah, M. J. (1994). Perception and awareness after brain damage. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 177-182.
51. Farah, M. J., Brunn, J. L., Wong, A. B., Wallace, M., & Carpenter, P. (1990). Frames of reference for the allocation of spatial attention: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 28, 335-347.
52. Farah, M. J., Wallace, M., & Vecera, S. P. (1993). "What" and "where" in visual attention: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. In I. H. Robertson & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 123-138). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
53. Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F., & Joanette, Y. (1989). The Bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11(2), 49-54.
54. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(3), 323-339.
55. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
56. Gilchrist, I. D., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13(8), 1223-1249.
57. Goldstein, E. B. (1996). Sensation and perception (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
58. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). A framework for interpreting distinctive patterns of hemispatial neglect. Neurocase, 1, 189-207.
59. Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A. (1998). Dissociable co-ordinate frames of unilateral spatial neglect: "Viewer-centered neglect." Brain and Cognition, 37, 491-526.
60. Huffman, J. E., & Nelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 283-290.
61. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1994). Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(2), 207-241.
62. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(3), 283-312.
63. Humphreys, G. W., Romani, C., Olson, A., Riddoch, M. J., & Duncan, J. (1994). Nonspatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans. Nature, 372, 357-359.
64. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
65. Karnath, H. O., Schenkel, P., & Fisher, B. (1991). Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the contralateral deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. Brain, 114, 1997-2014.
66. Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1996). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 6(6), 381-386.
67. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
68. Kramer, A. F., & Watson, S. E. (1996). Object-based visual selection and the principles of uniform connectedness. In A. F. Kramer & G. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 395-414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
69. Kramer, A. F., Weber, T. A., & Watson, S. E. (1997). Object-based attentional selection - Grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations? Comment on Vecera and Farah (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 3-13.
70. Làdavas, E. (1987). Is hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? Brain, 110, 167-180.
71. Làdavas, E., Petronio, A., & Umiltà, C. (1990). The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex, 26, 307-317.
72. Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(8), 1238-1251.
73. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 200, 269-294.
74. Matin, L., Picoult, E., Stevens, J., Edwards, M., & MacArthur, R. (1982). Oculoparalytic illusion: Visual-field dependent spatial mislocalizations by humans partially paralysed by curare. Science, 216, 198-201.
75. Mattingley, J. B., David, G., & Driver, J. (1997). Pre-attentive filling in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science, 275, 671-674.
76. McFie, J., & Zangwill, O. L. (1960). Visuo-constructive disabilities associated with lesions of the left cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 82, 243-260.
77. Moore, C., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9(2), 104-110.
78. Mozer, M. C., & Behrmann, M. (1990). On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist of neglect dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(2), 96-123.
79. Mozer, M. C., Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1997). The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of hemispatial neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(2), 171-190.
80. Mozer, M. C., Zemel, R., Behrmann, M., & Williams, C. (1992). Learning to segment by dynamic feature binding. Neural Computation, 4, 647-672.
81. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.
82. Olson, C., & Gettner, S. N. (1996). Brain representation of object-centered space. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 165-170.
83. Olson, C., & Gettner, S. N. (1998). Impairment of object-centered vision following lesions of macaque posterior parietal cortex. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 24, 1140.
84. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
85. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of performance. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Pouget, A., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). Spatial transformations in the parietal cortex using basis functions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(2), 222-237.
87. Reuter-Lorenz, P., Drain, M., & Hardy-Morais, C. (1996). Objectcentered attentional biases in the normal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 540-550.
88. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G., Burroughs, E., Luckhurst, L., Bateman, A., & Hill, S. (1995). Cueing in a case of neglect: Modality and automaticity effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(6), 605-622.
89. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Luckhurst, L., Burroughs, E., & Bateman, A. (1995). "Paradoxical neglect": Spatial representations, hemisphere-specific activation and spatial cueing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(6), 569-604.
90. Rorden, C., Mattingley, J. B., Karnath, H.-O., & Driver, J. (1997). Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage. Neuropsychologia, 35(4), 421-433.
91. Snyder, L. H., Grieve, K. L., Brotchie, P., & Andersen, R. A. (1998). Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex. Nature, 394, 887-891.
92. Stuart, G. W., Maruff, P., & Currie, J. (1997). Object-based visual attention in luminance increment detection. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 843-853.
93. Tipper, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(5), 1261-1278.
94. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
95. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
96. Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1998). The medium of attention: Location-based, object-centered or scene-based? In R. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
97. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
98. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object- and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
99. Treisman, A. (1992). Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. American Psychologist, 47, 862-875.
100. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1988). Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 15-21.
101. Umiltà, C., Castiello, U., Fontana, M., & Vestri, A. (1995). Object-centred orienting of attention. Visual Cognition, 2, 165-182.
102. Vecera, S., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 123, 1-14.
103. Wallach, H. (1959). The perception of motion. Scientific American, 201, 56-60.
104. Ward, R., & Goodrich, S. (1996). Differences between objects and nonobjects in visual extinction. Psychological Science, 7(3), 177-180.
105. Ward, R., Goodrich, S., & Driver, J. (1994). Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection. Visual Cognition, 1(1), 101-129.
106. Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (in press). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics.
107. Weber, T. A., Kramer, A. F., & Miller, G. A. (1997). Selective processing of superimposed objects: An electrophysiological analysis of object-based attentional selection. Biological Psychology, 45, 159-182.