Object-based selection in the two-rectangles method is not an artifact of the three-sided directional cue

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1103-1109

  Marrara, Mark T ^a,b   Moore, Cathleen M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Metavante Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347592202     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194837     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BAYLIS, G, C., & DRIVER, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.
2. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
3. CAVE, K. R., & BICHOT, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight metaphor. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 204-223.
4. CHEN, Z. (1998). Switching attention within and between objects: The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 7-16.
5. DRIVER, J. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 53-78.
6. DRIVER, J., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448-456.
7. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
8. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
9. KAHNEMAN, D., & HENIK, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. KELLMAN, P. J., & SHIPLEY, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
11. KRAMER, A. R., & JACOBSON, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
12. MOORE, C. M., YANTIS, S., & VAUGHAN, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
13. MOZER, M. C. (2002). Frames of reference in unilateral neglect and visual perception: A computational perspective. Psychological Review, 109, 156-185.
14. MOZER, M. C., ZEMEL, R. S., BEHRMANN, M., & WILLIAMS, C. K. I. (1992). Learning to segment images using dynamic feature finding. Neural Computation, 4, 647-662.
15. POSNER, M. I., NISSEN, M. J., & OGDEN, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. J. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. POSNER, M. I., SNYDER, C. R. R., & DAVIDSON, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
17. PRATT, J., & SEKULER, A. B. (2001). The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 721-727.
18. SCHOLL, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
19. VECERA, S. P., & FARAH, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
20. ZEMEL, R. S., BEHRMANN, M., MOZER, M. C., & BAVELIER, D. (2002). Experience-dependent perceptual grouping and object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 202-217.