Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 818-833

  Abrams, Richard A ^a   Law, Mark B ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034184334     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206925     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. ABRAMS, R. A., OONK, H. M., & PRATT, J. (1998). Fixation point offsets facilitate endogenous saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 201-208.
3. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
4. BRIAND, K. A., & KLEIN, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 228-241.
5. DAGENBACH, D., GOOLSBY, B., NEELY, C. A., & DUDZIAK, K. M. (1997, November). Further studies of attention to space and objects with endogenous cuing. Poster presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
6. DAVIS, G., & DRIVER, J. (1994). Parallel detection of Kanisza subjective figures in the human visual system. Nature, 371, 791-793.
7. DOWNING, C. J., & PINKER, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
8. DRIVER, J., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448-456.
9. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
10. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
11. ERIKSEN C. W., & YEH, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 583-597.
12. HENDERSON, J. M., & MACQUISTAN, A. D. (1993). The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 221-230.
13. JONIDES, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. JORDAN, H., & TIPPER, S. P. (1999). Spread of inhibition across an object's surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 495-507.
15. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
16. KANWISHER, N., & DRIVER, J. (1992). Objects, attributes, and visual attention: Which, what, and where. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 26-31.
17. KLEIN, R. M. (1994). Perceptual-motor expectancies interact with covert visual orienting under conditions of endogenous but not exogenous control. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 167-181.
18. KLEIN, R. M., & HANSEN, E. (1990). Chronometric analysis of spotlight failure in endogenous visual orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 790-801.
19. KLEIN, R. M., & MCCORMICK, P. (1989). Covert visual orienting: Hemifield-activation can be mimicked by zoom lens and midlocation placement strategies. Acta Psychologica, 70, 235-250.
20. KRAMER, A. F. & JACOBSON, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
21. KRAMER, A. F. WEBER, T. A., & WATSON, S. E. (1997). Object-based attentional selection - Grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: Comment on Vecera and Farah (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 3-13.
22. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
23. LABERGE, D., BROWN, V., CARTER, M., BASH, D., & HARTLEY, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 65-76.
24. LABERGE, D., CARLSON, R. L., WILLIAMS, J. K., & BUNNEY, B. G. (1997). Shifting attention in visual space: Tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity distribution model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1380-1392.
25. LAVIE, N., & DRIVER, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.
26. LAW, M. B., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1997, November). Endogenous and exogenous control of object-based attention. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
27. LAW, M. B., & ABRAMS, R. A. (2000). Simultaneous facilitation and inhibition on the surface of an object. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. LOGAN, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
29. MACQUISTAN, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512-515.
30. MÜLLER, H. J., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315-330.
31. MURPHY, K. R., & MYORS, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis. A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. NEELY, C. A., & DAGENBACH, D. (1996, October). Exogenous and endogenous cuing: Spatial versus object-based visual attention. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
33. OONK, H. M., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1998). New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 510-515.
34. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
35. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. POSNER, M. I., SNYDER, C. R., & DAVIDSON, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
37. RAFAL, R. D., CALABRESI, P. A., BRENNAN, C. W., & SCIOLTO, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673-685.
38. RIGGIO, L., & KIRSNER, K. (1997). The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 885-899.
39. SHULMAN, G. L., WILSON, J., & SHEEHY, J. B. (1985). Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 59-65.
40. STELMACH, L. B., & HERDMAN, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 539-550.
41. TIPPER, S. P., DRIVER, J., & WEAVER, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
42. VECERA, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
43. VECERA, S. P. (1997). Grouped arrays versus object-based representations: Reply to Kramer et al. (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 14-18.
44. VECERA, S. P., & FARAH, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
45. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
46. YANTIS, S. (1998). The control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). London: University College London Press.
47. YANTIS, S., & HILLSTROM, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 95-107.
48. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary vs. automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.