Structure-based modulation of inhibition of return is triggered by object-internal but not occluding shape features

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1857-1866

  Reppa, Irene ^a   Leek, E Charles ^b  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748994297     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210600872113     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
2. Castel, A. D., Chasteen, A. L., Scialfa, C. T., & Pratt, J. (2003). Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 58, 256-259.
3. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organisation of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 272-300.
4. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
5. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
6. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 504-509.
7. Klein, R. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
8. Leek, E. C., Reppa, I., & Tipper, S. P. (2003). Inhibition of return for objects and locations in static displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 388-395.
9. Mari-Beffa, P., Houghton, G., Estevez, A. F., & Fuentes, L. J. (2000). Word-based grouping affects the prime-task effect on semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 469-479.
10. McAuliffe, J., Pratt, J., & O' Donnell, C. (2001). Examining location-based and object-based components of inhibition-of-return in static displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1072-1082.
11. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
12. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
13. Pratt, J., Hillis, J., & Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 489-495.
14. Pratt, J., Spalek, T., & Bradshaw, E. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and non-inhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 730-746.
15. Reppa, I., & Leek, E. C. (2003). The modulation of inhibition-of-return by object-internal structure: Implications for theories of object-based attentional selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 493-502.
16. Robertson, L. C. (2004). Space, objects, minds, and brains. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
17. Schendel, K. L., Robertson, L.C., & Treisman, A. (2001). Objects and their locations in exogenous cueing. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 577-594.
18. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Short report: Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
19. Vecera, S. P., Behrmann, M., & Filapek, J. (2001). Selective attention to the parts of an object. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 308-321.
20. Wühr, P., & Waszak, F. (2003). Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect. Memory and Cognition, 31, 983-994.