Spread of inhibition across an object's surface

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 495-507

  Jordan, Heather ^a,b   Tipper, Steven P ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033410571     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712699161576     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams, R. A. & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. Baylis, G. C. & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-145.
4. Davis, G. & Driver, J. (1997). Spreading of visual attention over modally-versus amodally-completed visual surfaces. Psychological Science, 8, 275-281.
5. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
6. Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
7. Egly, R., Driver, J. & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
8. Eriksen, C. W. & St James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
9. Gibson, B. S. & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
10. Goldsmith, M. (1998). What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 189-219.
11. Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M. & Goldberg, M. E. (1998). The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature, 391, 481-484.
12. Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
13. Hummel, J. E. (1994). Reference frames and relations in computational models of object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 111-116.
14. Jordan, H. & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 504-509.
15. Kanwisher, N. & Driver, J. (1992). Objects, attributes, and visual attention: Which, what, and where. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 26-31.
16. Kramer A. F. & Watson, S. E. (1996). Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform connectedness. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles & G. D. Logan (Eds), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention, pp. 395-414. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
18. Maylor E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds), Attention and performance XI, pp. 189-204. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Maylor, E. A. & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777-787.
20. Müller, H. J. & von Mühlenen, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 224-249.
21. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
22. Posner, M. I. & Cohen, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds), Attention and performance X, pp. 531-556. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory : An integrated system for IBM-PC compatiables. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation and Computers, 20, 206-217.
24. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A. & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vison Research, 34, 179-189.
25. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C. & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
26. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J. & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
27. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H. & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 50-60.
28. Tipper, S. P., Rafal, R., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Starrveldt, Y., Ro, T., Egly, R., Danzinger, S. & Weaver, B. (1997). Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1522-1532.
29. Tipper, S. P. & Weaver, B. (1998). The medium of attention: Location-based, object-centred, or scene-based? In R. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention, pp. 77-107. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B. & Houghton, G. (1994a). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 809-840.
31. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M. & Burak, A. L. (1994b). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
32. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
33. Vecera, S. P. & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
34. Weaver, B., Lupiáñez, J. & Watson, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based and static display inhibition of return: A response to Müller & Mühlenen (1996). Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 993-1003.