Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 1017-1027

  Law, Mark B ^a   Abrams, Richard A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; CUES; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0036778392     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194753     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. ABRAMS, R. A., & LAW, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833.
3. ABRAMS, R. A., & PRATT, J. (2000). Oculocentric coding of inhibited eye movements to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 766-788.
4. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
5. BREITMEYER, B. G., & GANZ, L. (1976) Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1-36.
6. CHRIST, S. E., MCCRAE, C. S., & ABRAMS, R. A. (2002). Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 80-85.
7. DAGENBACH, D., GOOLSBY, B., NEELY, C. A., & DUDZIAK, K. M. (1997, November). Further studies of attention to space and objects with endogenous cuing. Poster presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
8. DAVIS, G., & DRIVER, J. (1994). Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system. Nature, 371, 791-793.
9. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
10. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
11. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
12. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
13. GELLATLY, A., COLE, G., & BLURTON, A. (1999). Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1609-1624.
14. JONIDES, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
16. LAMY, D. (2000). Object-based selection under focused attention: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1272-1279.
17. LAVIE, N., & DRIVER, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.
18. MACQUISTAN, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512-515.
19. MULLER, H. J., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315-330.
20. OONK, H. M., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1998). New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 510-515.
21. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
22. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. RAFAL, R. D., CALABRESI, P. A., BRENNAN, C. W., & SCIOLTO, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673-685.
24. RIGGIO, L., & KIRSNER, K. (1997). The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 885-899.
25. TIPPER, S. P., DRIVER, J., & WEAVER, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
26. VECERA, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
27. YANTIS, S., & HILLSTROM, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 95-107.
28. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary vs. automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.