Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 247-253

  Shomstein, Sarah ^a,b   Yantis, Steven ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; ENVIRONMENT; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; ENVIRONMENT; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 4644302215     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196566     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AVRAHAMI, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1604-1612.
2. BEHRMANN, M., ZEMEL, R. S., & MOZER, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
3. CEPEDA, N. J., & KRAMER, A. F. (1999). Strategic effects on object-based attentional selection. Acta Psychologica, 103, 1-19.
4. DESIMONE, R., & DUNCAN, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
5. EGETH, H. E., & YANTIS, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
6. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
7. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
8. GENG, J. J., & BEHRMANN, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13, 520-525.
9. MILLER, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 419-434.
10. MOORE, C. M., & EGETH, H. (1998). How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1296-1310.
11. MOORE, C. M., YANTIS, S., & VAUGHAN, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
12. PALMER, S. E. (2002). Perceptual organization in vision. In S. Yantis (Vol. Ed.) & H. Pashler (Series Ed.), Stevens' Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 1. Sensation and perception (3rd ed., pp. 177-234). New York: Wiley.
13. PALMER, S. E., & ROCK, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
14. REYNOLDS, J. H., CHELAZZI, L., & DESIMONE, R. (1999). Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1736-1753.
15. ROCK, I., & GUTMAN, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 275-285.
16. SHAW, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 586-598.
17. SHOMSTEIN, S., & YANTIS, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41-51.
18. WATSON, S. E., & KRAMER, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31-49.