Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 224-249

  Müller, Hermann J ^a   Von Mühlenen, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0030074273     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211877     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. BRADDICK, O. (1974). A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research, 14, 519-527.
3. CASTIELLO, U., & UMILTÀ, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 837-848.
4. CAVANAGH, P. (1992, September 11). Attention-based motion perception. Science, 257, 1563-1565.
5. CAVANAGH, P. (1993). The perception of form and motion. Current Biology, 3, 177-182.
6. CAVE, K. R., & WOLFE, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychotogy, 22, 225-271.
7. CRAWFORD, T. J., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1992). Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 32, 293-304.
8. DICK, M., ULLMAN, S., & SAGI, D. (1987, July 24). Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. Science, 237, 400-402.
9. DOWNING, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 188-202.
10. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
11. EGLY, R., RAFAL, R. D., & HENIK, A. (1992, November). Reflexive and voluntary orienting in detection and discrimination tasks. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
12. FINLEY, G. A. (1985). A high-speed point plotter for vision research. Vision Research, 25, 1993-1997.
13. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & WRIGHT, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 317-329.
14. GAWRYSZEWSKI, L. G., RIGGIO, L., RIZZOLATTI, G., & UMILTÀ, C. (1987). Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of "neutral" cues. Neuropsychologia, 25, 19-29.
15. GIBSON, B. S., & EGETH, H. (1994a). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 669-680.
16. GIBSON, B. S., & EGETH, H. (1994b). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
17. HALLIGAN, P. W., & MARSHALL, J. C. (1989). Laterality of motor response in visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1301-1307.
18. HEYWOOD, S., & CHURCHER, J. (1980). Structure of the visual array and saccadic latency: Implications for oculomotor control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 335-341.
19. HODGSON, T. L., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1995). Evidence relating to premotor theories of attention. In J. M. Findlay, R. W. Kentridge, & R. Walker (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (pp. 305-316). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. HODGSON, T. L., MÜLLER, H. J., & O'LEARY, M. J. (1995). Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. HONDA, H., & FINDLAY, J. M. (1992). Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: Dependence of saccadic latency on target location. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 167-174.
22. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1993). SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43-110.
23. IVRY, R. B., & COHEN, A. (1990). Dissociation of short-and long-range apparent motion in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 317-331.
24. JOANETTE, Y., BROUCHON, M., GAUTHIER, L., & SAMSON, M. (1986). Pointing with left versus right hand in left visual field neglect. Neuropsychologia, 24, 391-396.
25. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
26. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
27. KINGSTONE, A., & GAZZANIGA, M. S. (1992, June). Covert orienting in the split brain. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Quebec.
28. KLEIN, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
29. KLEIN, R. M., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. MAYLOR, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. MAYLOR, E. A., & HOCKEY, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 777-787.
32. MCCONKIE, G. W., & RAYNER, K. (1976). Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 365-368.
33. MÜLLER, H. J. (1995). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Discrete or continuous interaction? Unpublished manuscript.
34. MÜLLER, H. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1991). Luminance-increment detection: Capacity-limited or not? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 107-124.
35. MÜLLER, H. J., & VON MÜHLENEN, A. (1995). Attentional tracking of moving objects. Manuscript in preparation.
36. OLDFIELD, R. C. (1971). The assessment of analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
37. POLLATSEK, A., BOLOZKY, S., WELL, A. D., & RAYNER, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain & Language, 14, 174-180.
38. POSNER, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. POSNER, M. I., RAFAL, R. D., CHOATE, L., & VAUGHAN, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-218.
41. POSSAMAÏ, C.-A. (1991). A responding hand effect in a simple-RT precueing experiment: Evidence for a late locus of facilitation. Acta Psychologica, 77, 47-63.
42. PREVIC, F. H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 13, 519-575.
43. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & STORM, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 151-224.
44. RAFAL, R. D., CALABRESI, P. A., BRENNAN, C. W., & SCIOLTO, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673-685.
45. RAYNER, K., & BERTERA, J. H. (1979, October 26). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.
46. RIZZOLATTI, G., & GALLESE, V. (1988). Mechanisms and theories of spatial neglect. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 1, pp. 223-246). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47. RIZZOLATTI, G., RIGGIO, L., DASCOLA, I., & UMILTÀ, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favour of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40.
48. ROBERTSON, I. H., & NORTH, N. (1993). Active and passive activation of left limbs: Influence on visual and sensory neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31, 193-300.
49. SCHMIDT, W., KLEIN, R. M., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1995). Temporal order-judgments do not reveal "inhibition of return": A commentary on Gibson and Egeth (1994). Manuscript submitted for publication.
50. SHEPHERD, M. (1984). EMDISP: A visual display system with digital and analogue sampling. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 297-302.
51. SIMON, J. R., SLY, P. E., & VILAPAKKAM, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions towards the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica, 47, 63-81.
52. TERRY, K. M., VALDES, L. A., & NEILL, W. T. (1994). Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks? Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
53. TIPPER, S. P., DRIVER, J., & WEAVER, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
54. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., JERREAT, L. M., & BURAK, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
55. TREISMAN, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
56. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
57. YANTIS, S. (1992). Multi-element visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295-340.
58. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.
59. YANTIS, S., & GIBSON, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182-204.
60. YANTIS, S., & JOHNSON, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 295-340.
61. YANTIS, S., & JONES, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 166-178.
62. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.