Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 50-60

  Tipper, Steven P ^a   Jordan, Heather ^a   Weaver, Bruce ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0032602353     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211948     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. ANDERSON, R. A., & ZIPSER, D. (1990). A network model for learned spatial representation in the posterior parietal cortex. In J. L. McGaugh, N. M. Weinberger, & G. Lynch (Eds.), Brain organization and memory: Cells, systems, and circuits (pp. 382-407). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
4. BEHRMANN, M., & TIPPER, S. P. (1994). Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 351-375). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-145.
6. BOVENS, N., & BRYSBAERT, M. (1990). IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2 Turbo Pascal timing with extended resolution. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 332-334.
7. COSTELLO, A. DE L., & WARRINGTON, E. K. (1987). The dissociation of visuospatial neglect and visual dyslexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 50, 1110-1116.
8. CUBELLI, R., NICHELLI, P., BONITO, V., DE TANTI, A., & INZAGHI, M. G. (1991). Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral neglect. Brain & Cognition, 15, 139-159.
9. DALRYMPLE-ALFORD, E. C. (1992). Response-key input via the IBM PC/XT/AT's parallel printer port. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 78-79.
10. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
11. GIBSON, B. S., & EGETH, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
12. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1994). Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 207-241.
13. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 283-311.
14. JEANNEROD, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
15. JORDAN, H., & TIPPER, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 504-509.
16. KAHNEMAN, D., & TREISMAN, A.M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17. KAHNEMAN. D., TREISMAN, A. [M.], & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
18. LAW, M. B., PRATT, J., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 402-408.
19. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., MILÁN. E. G., TORNAY, F. J., MADRID, E., & TUDELA, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
20. MARR, D. (1982), Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
21. MAYLOR, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. MÜLLER, H. J., & VON MÜHLENEN, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 224-249.
23. PINKER, S. (1985). Visual cognition: An introduction. In S. Pinker (Ed.), Visual cognition (pp. 9-15). Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
24. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. POSNER, M. I., RAFAL, R., CHOATE, L. S., & VAUGHAN, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
26. POULTON, E. C. (1982). Influential companions: Effects of one strategy on another in the within subjects designs of cognitive psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 673-693.
27. PRATT, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 117-120.
28. RIDDOCH, M. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., LUCKHURST, L., BURROUGHS, E., & BATEMAN, A. (1995). "Paradoxical neglect": Spatial representations, hemisphere-specific activation, and spatial cueing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 569-604.
29. RO, T., & RAFAL, R. (in press). Apparent motion and attention: An object-based facilitatory component of visual orienting. Perception & Psychophysics.
30. TASSINARI, G., AGLIOTI, S., CHELAZZI, L., PERU, A., & BERLUCCHI, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vision Research, 34, 179-189.
31. TIPPER, S. P., & BEHRMANN, M. (1996). Object-centred not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1261-1278.
32. TIPPER, S. P., DRIVER, J., & WEAVER, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
33. TIPPER, S. P., HOWARD, L. A., & MEEGAN, D. (in press). Mechanisms of selective attention gain access to hand-centred frames of reference: Evidence from interference and negative priming effects. In S. R. Jackson (Ed.), Vision and action: Advances in cognition series. London: University College Press.
34. TIPPER, S. P., LORTIE, C., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 891-905.
35. TIPPER, S. P., RAFAL, R., REUTER-LORENZ, P. A., STARRVELDT, Y., RO, T., EGLY, R., DANZINGER, S., & WEAVER, B. (1997). Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1522-1532.
36. TIPPER, S. P., & WEAVER, B. (1998). The medium of attention: Location-based, object-centred, or scene-based? In R. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 77-107). New York: Oxford University Press.
37. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., JERREAT, L. M., & BURAK, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
38. WEAVER, B., LUPIÁÑEZ, J., & WATSON, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 993-1003.