Examining the effect of practice on inhibition of return in static displays

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 756-765

  Pratt, Jay ^a   McAuliffe, Jim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033129099     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03205543     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cueing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. KLEIN, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
3. KLEIN, R. M., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego: Academic Press.
4. LABERGE, D., & SAMUELS, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
5. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., MILÁN, E. G., TORNAY, F. J., MADRID, E., & TUDELA, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
6. MAYLOR, E. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. MAYLOR, E., & HOCKEY, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 777-787.
8. MOWBRAY, G. H., & RHOADES, M. V. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 16-23.
9. MÜLLER , H. J., & VON MÜHLENEN, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 224-249.
10. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. PRATT, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 117-120.
12. PRATT, J., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1343-1353.
13. PRATT, J., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1996). Practice and component submovements: The role of feedback in rapid aimed limb movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 149-156.
14. PRATT, J., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1999). Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 229-242.
15. PRATT, J., KINGSTONE, A., & KHOE, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location-and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 964-971.
16. PROTEAU, L., BLANDIN, Y., ALAIN, C., & DORIAN, A. (1994). The effects of the amount and variability of practice on the learning of a multi-segment motor task. Acta Psychologica, 85, 61-74.
17. TERRY, K. M., VALDES, L. A., & NEILL, W. T. (1994). Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks? Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
18. TIPPER, S. P., DRIVER, J., & WEAVER, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
19. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., JERREAT, L. M., & BURAK, A. L. (1994). Object-and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
20. WEAVER, B., LUPIÁÑEZ, J., & WATSON, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 993-1003.
21. WOLFE, J. M., & POKORNY, C. W. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357-362.
22. WRIGHT, R., & RICHARD, C. (1993). Inhibition-of-return at multiple locations in visual space. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 324-327.