Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed primes: Lexical architecture or modality-specific processes?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 680-691

  Feldman, Laurie Beth ^a   Larabee, Jacqueline ^b  

^a HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 85047681981     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.680     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (1999). Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross modal task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801-820.
3. Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 693-711.
4. Bergman, B., Hudson, P., & Eling, P. (1988). How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 41-72.
5. Burani, C. (1993). What determines morphological relatedness in the lexicon? In G. Altmann & R. C. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The Sperlonga Meeting II (pp. 141-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Burani, C., Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, XVIII, 4, 342-352.
7. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 287-332.
8. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1-13.
9. Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. A., & Gulligan, G. (1985). The suffix preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics, 23, 723-758.
10. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
11. Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098-1116.
12. Emmorey, K. D. (1989). Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 73-92.
13. Feldman, L. B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In M. Noonan, P. Downing, & S. Lima (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 239-254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Feldman, L. B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 442-470.
15. Feldman, L. B. (1999, November). Morphological similarity and orthographic similarity contrasted: A cross task comparison. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
16. Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1431-1444.
17. Feldman, L. B., & Bentin, S. (1994). Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 407-435.
18. Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 1-12.
19. Feldman, L. B., Frost, R., & Pnini, T. (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 947-960.
20. Feldman, L. B., & Moskovljević, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 573-581.
21. Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). What morphological priming reveals about morphological processing. Brain & Language, 68, 33-39.
22. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241-255.
23. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. E. Booij & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991 (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
24. Frost, R., Forster, K., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829-856.
25. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Hamburger, M. B., & Slowiaczek, L. M. (1996). Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 520-525.
27. Hanson, V. L., & Feldman, L. B. (1989). Language specificity in lexical organization: Evidence from deaf signers' lexical organization of ASL and English. Memory & Cognition, 17, 292-301.
28. Henderson, L. (1985). Towards a psychology of morphemes. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 15-72). London: Erlbaum.
29. Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, D. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 211-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). What's in a word? Levels of representation and word recognition. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 187-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Hudson, P. T. W., & Buijs, D. (1995). Left to right processing of derivational morphology. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 383-396). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Katz, L., Rexer, K., & Lukatela, G. (1991). The processing of inflected words. Psychological Research, 53, 25-32.
33. Kelliher, S., & Henderson, L. (1990). Morphologically based frequency effects in the recognition of irregularly inflected verbs. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 527-539.
34. Kirsner, K., Milech, D., & Standen, P. (1983). Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 11, 621-630.
35. Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1995). Distribution properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 345-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Libben, G. (1994). How is morphological decomposition achieved? Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 369-391.
37. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (1997). Semantic transparency and compound fracture. CLASNET working papers, 9, 1-13.
38. Manelis, L., & Tharp, D. A. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory & Cognition, 5, 690-695.
39. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound into meaning. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and processes (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Marslen-Wilson, W., Ford, M., Older, L., & Zhou, X. (1996). The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. In G. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 223-227). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
41. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
42. Marslen-Wilson, W., Zhou, X., & Ford, M. (1996). Morphology, modality, and lexical architecture. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 117-134). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
43. Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (1999a). Frequency effects in auditory word recognition: The case of suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 327-344.
44. Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (1999b). Morphological priming effect: The role of surface frequency. Brain & Language, 68, 54-60.
45. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
46. Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1297-1311.
47. Raveh, M., & Feldman, L. B. (1998, September). Facilitation from prefixed and suffixed forms: Evidence from Hebrew. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel.
48. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
50. Schriefers, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Roelofs, A. (1991). The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: Continuous processing or decomposition? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 26-47.
51. Smith, P. T., & Sterling, C. M. (1982). Factors affecting the perceived morphemic structure of written words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 704-721.
52. Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.
53. Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263-272.
55. Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289-297.
56. Taft, M. (1988). A morphological decomposition model of lexical representation. Linguistics, 26, 657-667.
57. Taft, M. (1994) Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. In D. Sandra & M. Taft (Eds.), Morphological structure, lexical representation and lexical access (pp. 271-294). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
58. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
59. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
60. Wurm, L. H. (1998). Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 438-461.