Epithelial organization, cell polarity and tumorigenesis

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 727-735

  McCaffrey, Luke Martin ^a   Macara, Ian G ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

UVOMORULIN;

APOPTOSIS; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELL POLARITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; EPITHELIUM CELL; EX VIVO STUDY; GENETIC REGULATION; GROWTH REGULATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; ORGAN SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPINDLE CELL;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL POLARITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL TRANSFORMATION, NEOPLASTIC; EPITHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELLS;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 80555131518     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.06.005     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Dickinson D.J., et al. A polarized epithelium organized by beta- and alpha-catenin predates cadherin and metazoan origins. Science 2011, 331:1336-1339.
2. Kim J.H., et al. Tunable interplay between epidermal growth factor and cell-cell contact governs the spatial dynamics of epithelial growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:11149-11153.
3. Brumby A.M., Richardson H.E. scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2003, 22:5769-5779.
4. Igaki T., et al. Intrinsic tumor suppression and epithelial maintenance by endocytic activation of Eiger/TNF signaling in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:458-465.
5. Grusche F.A., et al. Upstream regulation of the hippo size control pathway. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R574-R582.
6. Sato T., et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 2009, 459:262-265.
7. Blanpain C., Fuchs E. Epidermal stem cells of the skin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22:339-373.
8. Stingl J., et al. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature 2006, 439:993-997.
9. Shackleton M., et al. Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Nature 2006, 439:84-88.
10. Knoblich J.A. Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. Cell 2008, 132:583-597.
11. Williams S.E., et al. Asymmetric cell divisions promote Notch-dependent epidermal differentiation. Nature 2011, 470:353-358.
12. Snippert H.J., et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 2010, 143:134-144.
13. Lopez-Garcia C., et al. Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 2010, 330:822-825.
14. Quyn A.J., et al. Spindle orientation bias in gut epithelial stem cell compartments is lost in precancerous tissue. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6:175-181.
15. Schepers A.G., et al. Lgr5 intestinal stem cells have high telomerase activity and randomly segregate their chromosomes. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1104-1109.
16. Visvader J.E. Cells of origin in cancer. Nature 2011, 469:314-322.
17. Barker N., et al. Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature 2009, 457:608-611.
18. Wang X., et al. A luminal epithelial stem cell that is a cell of origin for prostate cancer. Nature 2009, 461:495-500.
19. Gerdes M.J., Yuspa S.H. The contribution of epidermal stem cells to skin cancer. Stem Cell Rev. 2005, 1:225-231.
20. Molyneux G., et al. BRCA1 basal-like breast cancers originate from luminal epithelial progenitors and not from basal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7:403-417.
21. Lim E., et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat. Med. 2009, 15:907-913.
22. Chaffer C.L., et al. Normal and neoplastic nonstem cells can spontaneously convert to a stem-like state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:7950-7955.
23. Vierbuchen T., et al. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 2010, 463:1035-1041.
24. Frisch S.M. E1a induces the expression of epithelial characteristics. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 127:1085-1096.
25. Crum C.P., McKeon F.D. p63 in epithelial survival, germ cell surveillance, and neoplasia. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2010, 5:349-371.
26. Asselin-Labat M.L., et al. Gata-3 is an essential regulator of mammary-gland morphogenesis and luminal-cell differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:201-209.
27. Kouros-Mehr H., et al. GATA-3 maintains the differentiation of the luminal cell fate in the mammary gland. Cell 2006, 127:1041-1055.
28. Gregory P.A., et al. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:593-601.
29. Brabletz S., Brabletz T. The ZEB/miR-200 feedback loop-a motor of cellular plasticity in development and cancer?. EMBO Rep. 2010, 11:670-677.
30. Spaderna S., et al. The transcriptional repressor ZEB1 promotes metastasis and loss of cell polarity in cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68:537-544.
31. Chang C.J., et al. p53 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cell properties through modulating miRNAs. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:317-323.
32. Proia T.A., et al. Genetic predisposition directs breast cancer phenotype by dictating progenitor cell fate. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:149-163.
33. Goldstein B., Macara I.G. The PAR proteins: fundamental players in animal cell polarization. Dev. Cell 2007, 13:609-622.
34. Zheng Z., et al. LGN regulates mitotic spindle orientation during epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:275-288.
35. Jaffe A.B., et al. Cdc42 controls spindle orientation to position the apical surface during epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:625-633.
36. Hao Y., et al. Par3 controls epithelial spindle orientation by aPKC-mediated phosphorylation of apical Pins. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1809-1818.
37. Qin Y., et al. Tuba, a Cdc42 GEF, is required for polarized spindle orientation during epithelial cyst formation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:661-669.
38. Rodriguez-Fraticelli A.E., et al. The Cdc42 GEF Intersectin 2 controls mitotic spindle orientation to form the lumen during epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:725-738.
39. Du Q., Macara I.G. Mammalian Pins is a conformational switch that links NuMA to heterotrimeric G proteins. Cell 2004, 119:503-516.
40. Balda M.S., et al. The ZO-1-associated Y-box factor ZONAB regulates epithelial cell proliferation and cell density. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:423-432.
41. Schlegelmilch K., et al. Yap1 acts downstream of alpha-catenin to control epidermal proliferation. Cell 2011, 144:782-795.
42. Silvis M.R., et al. α-Catenin is a tumor suppressor that controls cell accumulation by regulating the localization and activity of the transcriptional coactivator Yap1. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4:ra33.
43. Gladden A.B., et al. The NF2 tumor suppressor, Merlin, regulates epidermal development through the establishment of a junctional polarity complex. Dev Cell 2011, 19:727-739.
44. Chen C.L., et al. The apical-basal cell polarity determinant Crumbs regulates Hippo signaling in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:15810-15815.
45. Ling C., et al. The apical transmembrane protein Crumbs functions as a tumor suppressor that regulates Hippo signaling by binding to Expanded. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:10532-10537.
46. Grzeschik N.A., et al. Lgl, aPKC, and Crumbs regulate the Salvador/Warts/Hippo pathway through two distinct mechanisms. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:573-581.
47. Robinson B.S., et al. Crumbs regulates Salvador/Warts/Hippo signaling in Drosophila via the FERM-domain protein Expanded. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:582-590.
48. Lu H., Bilder D. Endocytic control of epithelial polarity and proliferation in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:1232-1239.
49. Varelas X., et al. The Crumbs complex couples cell density sensing to Hippo-dependent control of the TGF-beta-SMAD pathway. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:831-844.
50. Yoshihama Y., et al. KIBRA suppresses apical exocytosis through inhibition of aPKC kinase activity in epithelial cells. Curr. Biol. 2010, 21:705-711.
51. Buther K., et al. KIBRA is a novel substrate for protein kinase Czeta. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 317:703-707.
52. Rosse C., et al. An aPKC-exocyst complex controls paxillin phosphorylation and migration through localised JNK1 activation. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000235.
53. Hilton H.N., et al. KIBRA interacts with discoidin domain receptor 1 to modulate collagen-induced signalling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783:383-393.
54. Hidalgo-Carcedo C., et al. Collective cell migration requires suppression of actomyosin at cell-cell contacts mediated by DDR1 and the cell polarity regulators Par3 and Par6. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 13:49-58.
55. Cong W., et al. ASPP2 regulates epithelial cell polarity through the PAR complex. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1408-1414.
56. Sottocornola R., et al. ASPP2 binds Par-3 and controls the polarity and proliferation of neural progenitors during CNS development. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:126-137.
57. Liu C.Y., et al. PP1 cooperates with ASPP2 to dephosphorylate and activate TAZ. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:5558-5566.
58. Vigneron A.M., et al. Cytoplasmic ASPP1 inhibits apoptosis through the control of YAP. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:2430-2439.
59. Bilder D. Epithelial polarity and proliferation control: links from the Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressors. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:1909-1925.
60. Gallant P. Myc, cell competition, and compensatory proliferation. Cancer Res. 2005, 65:6485-6487.
61. Ohsawa S., et al. Elimination of oncogenic neighbors by JNK-mediated engulfment in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 2011, 20:315-328.
62. Warner S.J., Longmore G.D. Context-dependent compensatory proliferation in epithelial homeostasis and tumorigenesis. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:4037-4038.
63. Pagliarini R.A., Xu T. A genetic screen in Drosophila for metastatic behavior. Science 2003, 302:1227-1231.
64. Wu M., et al. Interaction between Ras(V12) and scribbled clones induces tumour growth and invasion. Nature 2010, 463:545-548.
65. Hogan C., et al. Interactions between normal and transformed epithelial cells: Their contributions to tumourigenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 43:496-503.
66. Tamori Y., et al. Involvement of Lgl and Mahjong/VprBP in cell competition. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000422.
67. McCaffrey L.M., Macara I.G. The Par3/aPKC interaction is essential for end bud remodeling and progenitor differentiation during mammary gland morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:1450-1460.
68. Aranda V., et al. Par6-aPKC uncouples ErbB2 induced disruption of polarized epithelial organization from proliferation control. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:1235-1245.
69. Bocker W., et al. Common adult stem cells in the human breast give rise to glandular and myoepithelial cell lineages: a new cell biological concept. Lab. Invest. 2002, 82:737-746.
70. Eder A.M., et al. Atypical PKCiota contributes to poor prognosis through loss of apical-basal polarity and cyclin E overexpression in ovarian cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:12519-12524.
71. Nolan M.E., et al. The polarity protein Par6 induces cell proliferation and is overexpressed in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68:8201-8209.
72. Zhan L., et al. Deregulation of scribble promotes mammary tumorigenesis and reveals a role for cell polarity in carcinoma. Cell 2008, 135:865-878.
73. Humbert P.O., et al. Control of tumourigenesis by the Scribble/Dlg/Lgl polarity module. Oncogene 2008, 27:6888-6907.
74. Kojima Y., et al. The overexpression and altered localization of the atypical protein kinase C lambda/iota in breast cancer correlates with the pathologic type of these tumors. Hum. Pathol. 2008, 39:824-831.
75. Mani S.A., et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 2008, 133:704-715.
76. Vidal M., et al. A role for the epithelial microenvironment at tumor boundaries: evidence from Drosophila and human squamous cell carcinomas. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176:3007-3014.
77. Eiraku M., et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 2011, 472:51-56.
78. Ridky T.W., et al. Invasive three-dimensional organotypic neoplasia from multiple normal human epithelia. Nat. Med. 2010, 16:1450-1455.
79. Pollack A.L., et al. Morphogenetic mechanisms of epithelial tubulogenesis: MDCK cell polarity is transiently rearranged without loss of cell-cell contact during scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor-induced tubulogenesis. Dev. Biol. 1998, 204:64-79.
80. Debnath J., et al. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods 2003, 30:256-268.
81. Martin-Belmonte F., et al. Cell-polarity dynamics controls the mechanism of lumen formation in epithelial morphogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:507-513.
82. Chen X., Macara I.G. Par-3 controls tight junction assembly through the Rac exchange factor Tiam1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:262-269.