Peer group reflection helps clinical teachers to critically reflect on their teaching

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

  Boerboom, Tobias B B ^a   Jaarsma, Debbie ^a   Dolmans, Diana H J M ^b   Scherpbier, Albert J J A ^b   Mastenbroek, Nicole J J M ^a   Van Beukelen, Peter ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NETHERLANDS; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FACULTY; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEACHING;

EID: 80155189485     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.610840     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arreola RA. 2007. Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. 3rd ed. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
2. Atwater LE, Waldman DA, Brett JF. 2002. Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback. Hum Resour Manage 41:193-208.
3. Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN. 2004. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med 9:971-977.
4. Berk RA. 2005. Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 17:48-62.
5. Berk RA. 2006. Thirteen strategies to measure college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
6. Boerboom TBB, Dolmans DHJM, Jaarsma ADC, Muijtjens AMM, van Beukelen P, Scherpbier AJJA. 2011. Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers' supervisory skills during clinical rotations. Med Teach 33:e84-e91.
7. Brown KW, Cozby PC, Kee DW, Worden PE. 1999. Research methods in human development. 2nd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
8. Cashin WE. 1999. Student ratings of professors: Uses and misuses. In: Seldin P, Hutchings P, editors. Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/ tenure decisions. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. pp 25-44.
9. Copeland HL, Hewson MG. 2000. Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center. Acad Med 75:161-166.
10. DeNisi AS, Kluger AN. 2000. Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Acad Manage Exec 14:129-139.
11. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Gerver WJ, de Grave W, Scherpbier AJJA. 2004. Providing physicians with feedback on how they supervise students during patient contacts. Med Teach 26:409-414.
12. Fluit C, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. 2010. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med 25:1337-1345.
13. Hamdy H, Williams R, Tekian A. 2001. Application of "VITALS": Visual indicators of teaching and learning success in reporting student evaluations of clinical teachers. Educ Health 14:267-276.
14. Hatton N, Smith D. 1995. Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teach Teach Educ 11:33-49.
15. Hendriksen J. 1997. Begeleid intervisiemodel, collegiale advisering en probleemoplossing. [Guided peer model, advising colleagues and problem solving]. Baarn, Netherlands: Nelissen.
16. Korthagen FAJ, Vasalos A. 2005. Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teach Teach Theory Pract 11:47-71.
17. Lane IF, Strand E. 2008. Clinical veterinary education: Insights from faculty and strategies for professional development in clinical teaching. J Vet Med Educ 35:397-406.
18. Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Lazaridis EN, Skeff KM. 1998. Beneficial and harmful effects of augmented feedback on physicians'clinical- teaching performances. Acad Med 73:324-332.
19. Marsh HW, Roche LA. 1997. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Am Psychol 52:1187-1197.
20. McGrath C, Wai Kit Yeung R, Comfort MB. 2005. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to evaluate clinical dental teachers (ECDT). Br Dent J 198:45-48.
21. Mcleod PJ, Steinert Y. 2009. Peer coaching as an approach to faculty development. Med Teach 31:1043-1044.
22. Meirink JA, Meijer PC, Verloop N. 2007. A closer look at teachers' individual learning in collaborative settings. Teach Teach Theory Pract 13:145-164.
23. Miles MB, Huberman AM. 1984. Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Moore S, Kuol N. 2005. Students evaluating teachers: Exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching. Teach High Educ 10:57-73.
25. Morrison J. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. Brit Med J 326:385-387.
26. Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen E, Lombarts K, van de Ven G, Grol R, Arah O. 2009. Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: A qualitative study. Med Educ 43:874-882.
27. Pee B, Woodman T, Fry H, Davenport ES. 2002. Appraising and assessing reflection in students' writing on a structured worksheet. Med Educ 36:575-585.
28. Ramani S. 2006. Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Med Teach 28:19-23.
29. Ramsey PG, Gillmore GM, Irby DM. 1988. Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship: Relationship of instructor experience and training setting to ratings of teaching effectiveness. J Gen Intern Med 3:351-355.
30. Ross JA, Bruce CD. 2007. Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teach Teach Educ 23:146-159.
31. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten CPM, Metsemakers J. 2008. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection uponmulti-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ 13:275-288.
32. Schaub-de Jong MA, Cohen-Schotanus J, Dekker H, Verkerk M. 2009. The role of peer meetings for professional development in health scienceeducation: A qualitative analysis of reflective essays. Adv Health Sci Educ 14:503-513.
33. Schön DA. 1991. Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34. Seifert CF, Yukl G, McDonald RA. 2003. Effects of multisource feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. J Appl Psychol 88:561-569.
35. Seldin P. 2006. Evaluating faculty performance: A practical guide to assessing teaching, research, and service. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
36. Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR. 2005. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Person Psychol 58:33-66.
37. Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K, Rothman A, Rowe R. 2000. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: New perspectives and challenges. Med Educ 34:862-870.
38. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. 2008. The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: Involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach 30:e270-e277.
39. Stalmeijer R, Dolmans D, Wolfhagen I, Peters W, van Coppenolle L, Scherpbier A. 2009. Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ 15:315-328.
40. Steinert Y, Mann KV. 2006. Faculty development: Principles and practices. J Vet Med Educ 33:317-324.
41. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, de Grave WS, Wolfhagen HAP, van der Vleuten CPM. 2006. Portfolio as a tool to stimulate teachers' reflections. Med Teach 28:277-282.
42. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, Meijer PC, de Grave WS, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008. Teachers' interactions and their collaborative reflection processes during peer meetings. Adv Health Sci Educ 13:289-308.
43. Ward JR, McCotter SS. 2004. Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teach Teach Educ 20:243-257.
44. Watts M, Lawson M. 2009. Using a meta-analysis activity to make critical reflection explicit in teacher education. Teach Teach Educ 25:609-616