Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling

Water Resources Research

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Clark, Martyn P ^a   Kavetski, Dmitri ^b   Fenicia, Fabrizio ^c,d  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^c LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Luxembourg)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE PROCESS; CATCHMENT SCALE; ENVIRONMENTAL DATA; ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; HYDROLOGICAL PROCESS; HYPOTHESIS SPACE; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MULTIPLE MODELS; NATURAL SYSTEMS; OBSERVED DATA; OPTIMALITY PRINCIPLE; PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY; RECENT PROGRESS; RESEARCH DIRECTIONS;

CATCHMENTS;

CATCHMENT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA SET; HETEROGENEITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 80053590883     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009827     Document Type: Article

References (170)

1. Abramowitz, G., R. Leuning, M. P. Clark, and A. Pitman (2008), Evaluating the Performance of Land Surface Models, J. Clim., 21, 5468-5481, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2378.1.
2. Ambroise, B., K. Beven, and J. Freer (1996), Toward a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts: Topographic indices of hydrological similarity, Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2135-2145, doi:10.1029/95WR03716. (Pubitemid 26351991)
3. Andréassian, V., C. Perrin, L. Berthet, N. Le Moine, J. Lerat, C. Loumagne, L. Oudin, T. Mathevet, M.-H. Ramos, and A. Valery (2009), Crash tests for standardized evaluation of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1757-1764, doi:10.5194/hess-13-1757-2009.
4. Andréassian, V., C. Perrin, E. Parent, and A. Bardossy (2010), The Court of Miracles of Hydrology: Can failure stories contribute to hydrological science?, Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 849-856.
5. Atkinson, S. E., R. A. Woods, and M. Sivapalan (2002), Climate and lanscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing landscapes, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1314, doi:10.1029/2002WR001487.
6. Atkinson, S. E., M. Sivapalan, R. A. Woods, and N. R. Viney (2003), Dominant physical controls on hourly flow predictions and the role of spatial variability: Mahurangi catchment, New Zealand, Adv. Water Resour., 26, 219-235, doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00183-5. (Pubitemid 36238575)
7. Bai, Y., T. Wagener, and P. Reed (2009), A top-down framework for watershed model evaluation and selection under uncertainty, Environ. Modell. Software, 24, 901-916, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.12.012.
8. Beven, K. J. (2000), Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4(2), 203-213, doi:10.5194/hess-4-203-2000.
9. Beven, K. J. (2001), On hypothesis testing in hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 15, 1655-1657, doi:10.1002/hyp.436.
10. Beven, K. J. (2002), Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrological response modelling system, Hydrol. Process., 16, 189-206, doi:10.1002/hyp.343. (Pubitemid 34137749)
11. Beven, K. J. (2005), On the concept of model structural error, Water Sci. Technol., 52, 167-175.
12. Beven, K. J. (2006a), A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18-36.
13. Beven, K. J. (2006b), Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology: Qt = H(S, R, dt) A as closure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 609-618.
14. Beven, K. J. (2008), On doing better hydrological science, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3549-3553, doi:10.1002/hyp.7108.
15. Beven, K. J., and M. J. Kirkby (1979), A physically based, variable contributing model of basin hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. Bulletin, 24, 43-69. (Pubitemid 9451768)
16. Beven, K. J., and A. M. Binley (1992), The future of distributed hydrological models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279-298, doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
17. Beven, K. J., and J. E. Freer (2001), Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11-29, doi:10.1016/S0022- 1694(01)00421-8. (Pubitemid 32664993)
18. Beven, K. J., P. J. Smith, and J. E. Freer (2008), So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent?, J. Hydrol., 354(1-4), 15-32.
19. Birkel, C., D. Tetzlaff, S. M. Dunn, and C. Soulsby (2010), Towards a simple dynamic process conceptualization in rainfall-runoff models using multi-criteria calibration and tracers in temperate, upland catchments, Hydrol. Process., 566(24), 260-275.
20. Blazkova, S., K. Beven, P. Tacheci, and A. Kulasova (2002), Testing the distributed water table predictions of TOPMODEL (allowing for uncertainty in model calibration): The death of TOPMODEL?, Water Resour. Res., 38(11), 1257, doi:10.1029/2001WR000912.
21. Blöschl, G. (2006), Hydrologic synthesis: Across processes, places, and scales, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S02, doi:10.1029/2005WR004319.
22. Bohn, T. J., M. Y. Sonessa, and D. P. Lettenmaier (2010), Seasonal hydrologic forecasting: Do multi-model ensemble averages always yield improvements in forecast skill?, J. Hydrometeor., 11, 1358-1372, doi:10.1175/2010JHM1267.1.
23. Boone, A., and P. J. Wetzel (1996), Issues related to low resolution modeling of soil moisture: Experience with the PLACE model, Global and Planetary Change, 13, 161-181.
24. Boyle, D. P., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian (2000), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3663-3674, doi:10.1029/ 2000WR900207. (Pubitemid 32039916)
25. Breuer, L., et al. (2009), Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM) I: Model intercomparison of current land use, Adv. Water Resour., 32, 129-146, doi:10.1016/ j.advwatres.2008.10.003.
26. Bulygina, N., and H. Gupta (2009), Estimating the uncertain mathematical structure of a water balance model via Bayesian data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00B13, doi:10.1029/2007WR006749.
27. Bulygina, N., and H. Gupta (2010), How Bayesian data assimilation can be used to estimate the mathematical structure of a model, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24, 925-937, doi:10.1007/ s00477-010-0387-y.
28. Butts, M. B., J. T. Payne, M. Kristensen, and H. Madsen (2004), An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modeling uncertainty for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 298, 242-266. (Pubitemid 39098776)
29. Burnash, R. J. C., R. L. Ferral, and R. A. McGuire (1973), A generalized streamflow simulation system: Conceptual modeling for digital computers, Technical Report, U.S. NationalWeather Service, Sacramento, California.
30. Buytaert, W., and K. Beven (2011), Models as multiple working hypotheses: Hydrological simulation of tropical alpine wetlands, Hydrol. Processes, doi:10.1002/hyp.7936.
31. Chamberlin, T. C. (1890), The method of multiple working hypotheses, Science (old series), 15, 92.
32. Clark, M. P., A. G. Slater, D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, J. A. Vrugt, H. V. Gupta, T. Wagener, and L. E. Hay (2008a), Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B02, doi:10.1029/2007WR006735.
33. Clark, M. P., D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, X. Zheng, R. P. Ibbitt, A. G. Slater, J. Schmidt, andM. Uddstrom (2008b), Hydrological data assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Use of streamflow data to update the states in a distributed hydrological model, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1309-1324.
34. Clark, M. P., D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, H. J. Tromp-van Meerveld, N. E. Peters, and J. E. Freer (2009), Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: Linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale, Hydrol. Process., 23(2), 311-319, doi:10.1002/hyp.7154.
35. Clark, M. P., and D. Kavetski (2010), Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling. Part 1: Fidelity and efficiency of time stepping schemes, Water Resour. Res., 46,W10510, doi:10.1029/2009WR008894.
36. Clark, M. P., H. K. McMillan, D. B. G. Collins, D. Kavetski, and R. A. Woods (2011), Hydrological field data from a modeller's perspective. Part 2: Process-based evaluation of model hypotheses, Hydrol. Processes, 25, 523-543, doi:10.1002/hyp.7902.
37. Cressie, N., C. A. Calder, J. S. Clark, J. M. ver Hoef, and C. K. Wikle (2009), Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: The strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling, Ecol. Appl., 19(3), 553-570, doi:10.1890/07-0744.1.
38. Desborough, C. E. (1999), Surface energy balance complexity in GCM land surface models, Climate Dynamics, 15, 389-403, 10.1007/s0038 20050289. (Pubitemid 29414092)
39. Di Baldassarre, G., and A. Montanari (2009), Uncertainty in river discharge observations: A quantitative analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13(6), 913-921.
40. Dooge, J. C. I. (1986), Looking for hydrologic laws, Water Resour. Res., 22(9S), 46S-58S, doi:10.1029/WR022i09Sp0046S.
41. Duan, Q., et al. (2006), Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops, J. Hydrol., 320(1-2), 3-17.
42. Dunn, S. M., J. Freer, M. Weiler, M. J. Kirkby, J. Seibert, P. F. Quinn, G. Lischeid, D. Tetzlaff, and C. Soulsby (2008), Conceptualization in catchment modelling: Simply learning?, Hydrol. Process., 22(13), 2389-2393. (Pubitemid 351927476)
43. Eder, G., M. Sivapalan, and H. P. Nachtenbel (2003), Modelling of water balances in an Alpine catchment through exploitation of emerging properties over changing time scales, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2125-2149. (Pubitemid 37106048)
44. Famiglietti, J. S., and E. F. Wood (1994), Multi-scale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance Processes, Water Resour. Res., 30(11), 3061-3078, doi:10.1029/94WR01498. (Pubitemid 293013)
45. Farmer, D., M. Sivapalan, and C. Jothityangkoon (2003), Climate, soil and vegetation controls upon the variability of water balance in temperature and semiarid landscapes: Downward approach to water balance analysis, Water Resour. Res., 39(2), 1035, doi:10.1029/2001WR000328.
46. Fenicia, F., H. H. G. Savenije, P. Matgen, and L. Pfister (2006), Is the groundwater reservoir linear? Learning from data in hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 139-150.
47. Fenicia, F., J. J. McDonnell, and H. H. G. Savenije (2008a), Learning from model improvement : On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding, Water Resour. Res., 44(6), W06419, doi:10.1029/ 2007WR006386.
48. Fenicia, F., H. H. G. Savenije, P. Matgen, and L. Pfister (2008b), Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01402, doi:10.1029/2006WR005563. (Pubitemid 351304127)
49. Franks, S., P. Gineste, K. J. Beven, and P. Merot (1998), On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: The incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process, Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 787-797, doi:10.1029/97WR03041. (Pubitemid 28159457)
50. Freer, J. E., H. McMillan, J. J. McDonnell, and K. J. Beven (2004), Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures, J. Hydrol., 291(3-4), 254-277. (Pubitemid 38527208)
51. Gupta, H. V., T. Wagener, and Y. Liu (2008), Reconciling theory with observations: Elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3802-3813.
52. Harman, C. J., M. Sivapalan, and P. Kumar (2009), Power law catchmentscale recessions arising from heterogeneous linear 638 small-scale dynamics, Water Resour. Res., 45, W09404, doi:10.1029/2008WR007392.
53. Holländer, H. M., et al. (2009), Comparative predictions of discharge from an artificial catchment (Chicken Creek) using sparse data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2069-2094.
54. Hood, J. L., and M. Hayashi (2010), Assessing the application of a laser rangefinder for determining snow depth in inaccessible alpine terrain, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 901-910, doi:910.5194/hess-5114-5901-2010.
55. Hsu, K. L., H. Moradkhani, and S. Sorooshian (2009), A sequential Bayesian approach for hydrologic model selection and prediction, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00B12, doi:10.1029/2008WR006824.
56. Ivanov, V. Y., E. R. Vivoni, R. L. Bras, and D. Entekhabi (2004), Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model, Water Resour. Res., 40(11), W11102, doi:10.1029/ 2004WR003218.
57. Jakeman, A. J., and G. M. Hornberger (1993), How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?, Water Resour. Res., 29(8), 2637-2649, doi:10.1029/93WR00877.
58. Jankov, I., W. A. Gallus, M. Segal, B. Shaw, and S. E. Koch (2005), The impact of different WRF model physical parameterizations and their interactions on warm season MCS rainfall, Weather and Forecasting, 20, 1048-1060. (Pubitemid 43193383)
59. Jothityangkoon, C., M. Sivapalan, and D. Farmer (2001), Process controls on water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: Downward approach to hydrological model development, J. Hydrol., 254, 174-198. (Pubitemid 33136587)
60. Kampf, S. K., and S. J. Burges (2007), A framework for classifying and comparing distributed hillslope and catchment hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 43, W05423, doi:10.1029/2006WR005370. (Pubitemid 47007567)
61. Kavetski, D., S. Franks, and G. Kuczera (2002), Confronting Input Uncertainty in Environmental Modelling, in Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by Q. Y. Duan, et al., pp. 49-68, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC.
62. Kavetski, D., and M. P. Clark (2010), Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling. Part 2: Impact of time stepping schemes on model analysis and prediction, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10511, doi:10.1029/2009WR008896.
63. Kavetski, D., and M. P. Clark (2011), Numerical troubles in conceptual hydrology: Approximations, absurdities and impact on hypothesis-testing, Hydrol. Process., 25, doi:10.1002/hyp.7899.
64. Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks (2003), Semidistributed hydrological modeling: A ''saturation path'' perspective on TOPMODEL and VIC, Water Resour. Res., 39(9), 1246, doi:10.1029/2003WR002122.
65. Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks (2006), Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory, Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03407, doi:10.1029/2005WR004368.
66. Kavetski, D., F. Fenicia, and M. P. Clark (2011), Impact of temporal data resolution on parameter inference and model identification in conceptual hydrological modeling: Insights from an experimental catchment, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05501, doi:10.1029/2010WR009525.
67. Kirchner, J. W. (2006), Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03S04, doi:10.1029/2005WR 004362.
68. Kirchner, J. W. (2009), Catchments as simple dynamic systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall-runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward, Water Resour. Res., 45, W02429, doi:10.1029/2008WR006912.
69. Klemes, V. (1983), Conceptualization and scale in hydrology, J. Hydrol., 65, 1-23, doi:10.1016/0022-1694(83)90208-1.
70. Klemes, V. (1986), Operational testing of hydrologic simulation models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 31, 13-24, doi:10.1080/02626668609491024. (Pubitemid 16519390)
71. Kollet, S. J., and R. Maxwell (2008a), Capturing the influence of groundwater dynamics on land surface processes using an integrated, distributed watershed model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W02402, doi:10.1029/ 2007WR006004.
72. Kollet, S. J., and R. Maxwell (2008b), Quantifying the effects of threedimensional subsurface heterogeneity on Hortonian runoff processes using a coupled numerical, stochastic approach, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 807-817, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.01.020.
73. Kollet, S. J., R. M. Maxwell, C. S. Woodward, S. Smith, J. Vanderborght, H. Vereecken, and C. Simmer (2010), Proof of concept of regional scale hydrologic simulations at hydrologic resolution utilizing massively parallel computer resources, Water Resour. Res., 46, W04201, doi:10.1029/ 2009WR008730.
74. Koster, R. D., and P. C. D. Milly (1997), The interplay between transpiration and runoff formulations in land surface schemes used with atmospheric models, J. Clim., 10, 1578-1591.
75. Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez (1992), Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2697-2715.
76. Krajewski, W. F., G. J. Ciach, and E. Habib (2003), An analysis of small scale rainfall variability in different climatic regimes, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 151-162. (Pubitemid 36435068)
77. Krueger, T., J. Freer, J. N. Quinton, C. J. A. Macleod, G. S. Bilotta, R. E. Brazier, P. Butler, and P. M. Haygarth (2010), Ensemble evaluation of hydrological model hypotheses, Water Resour. Res., 46, W07516. doi:10.1029/2009WR007845.
78. Kuczera, G., and S. Franks (2002), Testing hydrologic models: Fortification or falsification?, in Mathematical Modelling of Large Watershed Hydrology, edited by V. P. Singh and D. K. Frevert, Water Resources Pub., Littleton, CO.
79. Kuczera, G., D. Kavetski, S. Franks, and M. Thyer (2006), Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Characterising model error using storm-dependent parameters, J. Hydrol., 331(1-2), 161-177. (Pubitemid 44646456)
80. Kumar, P. (2011), Typology of hydrologic predictability, Water Resour. Res., 47, W00H05, doi:10.1029/2010WR009769.
81. Kumar, S. V., et al. (2006), Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling, Environ. Modell. Software, 21(10), 1402-1415, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.004. (Pubitemid 44038636)
82. Lamb, R., and K. Beven (1997), Using interactive recession curve analysis to specify a general catchment storage model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1, 101-113, doi:10.5194/hess-1-101-1997. (Pubitemid 127656776)
83. Larson, K. M., E. Gutmann, V. Zavorotny, J. Braun, M. Williams, and F. Nievinski (2009), Can we measure snow depth with GPS receivers?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17502, doi:10.1029/2009GL039430.
84. Larson, K. M., J. Braun, E. E. Small, V. Zavorotny, E. Gutmann, and A. Bilich (2010), GPS multipath and its relation to near-surface soil moisture content, IEEE J-STARS, 3, 91-99, doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2033612.
85. Lawrence, D. M., et al. (2011), Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 3, M03001, 27 pp., doi:10.1029/ 2011MS000045.
86. Le Moine, N., V. Andrassian, C. Perrin, and C. Michel (2007), How can rainfall-runoff models handle intercatchment groundwater flows? Theoretical study based on 1040 French catchments, Water Resour. Res., 43, W06428, doi:10.1029/2006WR005608. (Pubitemid 47124449)
87. Leavesley, G. H., S. L. Markstrom, P. J. Restrepo, and R. J. Viger (2002), A modular approach to addressing model design, scale, and parameter estimation issues in distributed hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Process., 16(2), 173-187. (Pubitemid 34137748)
88. Lehmann, E. L., and J. P. Romano (2005), Testing statistical hypotheses, 3rd ed., 786 pp., Springer, NY.
89. Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood, and S. J. Burges (1994), A simple hydrologically based model of land-surface water and energy fluxes for general-circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D7), 14415-14428, doi:10.1029/94JD00483.
90. Liang, X., Z. H. Xie, and M. Y. Huang (2003), A new parameterization for surface and groundwater interactions and its impact on water budgets with the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface model, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D16), 8613, doi:10.1029/2002JD003090.
91. Livneh, B., Y. Xia, K. E. Mitchell, M. B. Ek, and D. P. Lettenmaier (2010), Noah LSM snow model diagnostics and enhancements, J. Hydrometeorol., 11, 721-738, doi:10.1175/2009JHM1174.1.
92. Marshall, L., D. Nott, and A. Sharma (2007), Towards dynamic catchment modelling: A Bayesian hierarchical mixtures of experts framework, Hydrol. Process., 21(7), 847-861, doi:10.1002/hyp.6294. (Pubitemid 46510578)
93. Maxwell, R. M., and N. L. Miller (2005), Development of a coupled land surface and groundwater model, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 233-247, doi:10.1175/JHM422.1. (Pubitemid 40990250)
94. McDonnell, J. J., et al. (2007), Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07301, doi:10.1029/2006WR005467. (Pubitemid 350194455)
95. McGuire, K. J., M. Weiler, and J. J. McDonnell (2007), Integrating tracer experiments with modeling to assess runoff processes and water transit times, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 824-837, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2006. 07.004.
96. McMillan, H., J. Freer, F. Pappenberger, T. Krueger, and M. P. Clark (2010), Impact of uncertain river flow data on rainfall-runoff model calibration and discharge predictions, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1270-1284.
97. McMillan, H. K., M. P. Clark, W. B. Bowden, M. Duncan, and R. A. Woods (2011), Hydrological field data from a modeler's perspective. Part 1: Diagnostic tests for model structure, Hydrol. Process., 25, 511-522, doi:10.1002/hyp.7841.
98. Moore, R. J., and R. T. Clarke (1981), A distribution function approach to rainfall runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 17(5), 1367-1382, doi:10.1029/WR017i005p01367.
99. Morrissey, M. L., J. A. Maliekal, J. S. Greene, and J. M. Wang (1995), The uncertainty of simple spatial averages using rain-gauge networks, Water Resour. Res., 31, 2011-2017, doi:10.1029/95WR01232. (Pubitemid 26445727)
100. Mroczkowski, M., R. G. Paul, and G. Kuczera (1997), The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models, Water Resour. Res., 33, 2325-2335, doi:10.1029/97WR01922. (Pubitemid 27426690)
101. Niu, G. Y., Z. L. Yang, R. E. Dickinson, L. E. Gulden, and H. Su (2007), Development of a simple groundwater model for use in climate models and evaluation with Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment data, J. Geophys. Res., 112(D7), D07103, doi:10.1029/2006JD007522. (Pubitemid 46916205)
102. Niu, G.-Y., et al. (2011), The Community Noah Land Surface Model with Multi-Parameterization Options (NOAH-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, doi:10.1029/2010JD015139.
103. Nordbotten, J. M., M. A. Celia, H. K. Dahle, and S. M. Hassanizadeh (2007), Interpretation of macroscale variables in Darcy's law, Water Resour. Res., 43(8), W08430, doi:10.1029/2006WR005018. (Pubitemid 47509811)
104. Oleson, K.W., et al. (2010), Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM), NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-478+STR
105. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 257
106. Pande, S., M. McKee, and L. A. Bastidas (2009), Complexity-based robust hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10406, doi:10.1029/ 2008WR007524.
107. Perrin, C., C. Michel, and V. Andréassian (2001), Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments, J. Hydrol., 242(3-4), 275-301. (Pubitemid 32169968)
108. Perrin, C., C. Michel, and V. Andréassian (2003), Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 279(1-4), 275-289. (Pubitemid 37143319)
109. Pitman, A. J., and A. Henderson-Sellers (1998), Recent progress and results from the project for the intercomparison of land surface parameterization schemes, J. Hydrol., 213, 128-135, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98) 00206-6. (Pubitemid 29020061)
110. Pomeroy, J. W., D. M. Gray, T. Brown, N. R. Hedstrom, W. L. Quinton, R. J. Granger, and S. K. Carey (2007), The cold regions hydrological model: A platform for basing process representation and model structure on physical evidence, Hydrol. Process, 21(19), 2650-2667, doi:10.1002/ hyp.6787. (Pubitemid 47484745)
111. Popper, K. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London, 480
112. Prokop, A. (2008), Assessing the applicability of terrestrial laser scanning for spatial snow depth measurements, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 54(3), 155-163, doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.07.002.
113. Qu, Y. Z., and C. J. Duffy (2007), A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation, Water Resour. Res., 43, W08419, doi:10.1029/2006WR005752. (Pubitemid 47509801)
114. Reed, S., V. Koren, M. Smith, Z. Zhang, F. Moreda, and D. J. Seo (2004), Overall distributed model intercomparison project results, J. Hydrol., 298, 27-60, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.031. (Pubitemid 39098767)
115. Reggiani, P., M. Sivapalan, and S. M. Hassanizadeh (1998), A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy, and the second law of thermodynamics, Adv. Water Resour., 22(4), 367-398, doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00012-8. (Pubitemid 29145484)
116. Reggiani, P., S. M. Hassanizadeh, M. Sivapalan, and W. G. Gray (1999), A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Constitutive relationships, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 15-39, doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00005-6. (Pubitemid 30005674)
117. Reichert, P., and J. Mieleitner (2009), Analyzing input and structural uncertainty of nonlinear dynamic models with stochastic, time-dependent parameters, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10402, doi:10.1029/2009WR007814.
118. Renard, B., D. Kavetski, M. Thyer, G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks (2010), Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05521, doi:10.1029/2009WR008328.
119. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and J. M. Meija (1974), Design of rainfall networks in time and space, Water Resour. Res., 10, 713-728, doi:10.1029/ WR010i004p00713.
120. Saltelli, A. (2002), Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices, Comput. Phys. Commun., 145(2), 280-297, doi:10.1016/ S0010-4655(02)00280-1. (Pubitemid 34524628)
121. Savenije, H. H. G. (2001), Equifinality, a blessing in disguise, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2835-2838.
122. Savenije, H. H. G. (2009), The art of hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 157-161.
123. Sayama, T., and J. J. McDonnell (2009), A new time-space accounting scheme to predict stream water residence time and hydrograph source components at the watershed scale, Water Resour. Res., 45, W07401, doi:10.1029/ 2008WR007549.
124. Schaefli, B., C. J. Harman, M. Sivapalan, and S. J. Schymanski (2011), HESS Opinions: Hydrologic predictions in a changing environment: Behavioral modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 635-646.
125. Schoups, G., N. C. van de Giesen, and H. H. G. Savenije (2008), Model complexity control for hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B03, doi:10.1029/2008WR006836.
126. Schymanski, S., M. Roderick, M. Sivapalan, L. Hutley, and J. Beringer (2007), A test of the optimality approach to modeling canopy properties and CO2 uptake by natural vegetation, Plant Cell Environ., 30, 1586-1598, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01728.x. (Pubitemid 350029544)
127. Schymanski, S. J., M. Sivapalan, M. L. Roderick, J. Beringer, and L. B. Hutley (2008), An optimality-based model of the coupled soil moisture and root dynamics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 913-932, doi:10.5194/ hess-12-913-2008.
128. Schymanski, S. J., M. Sivapalan, M. L. Roderick, L. B. Hutley, and J. Beringer (2009), An optimality-based model of the dynamic feedbacks between natural vegetation and the water balance, Water Resour. Res., 45, W01412, doi:10.1029/2008WR006841.
129. Seibert, J. (2000), Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4(2), 215-224.
130. Seibert, J., and J. J. McDonnell (2002), On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 38(11), 1241, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR000978.
131. Selker, J., N. van de Giesen, M. Westhoff, W. Luxemburg, and M. B. Parlange (2006), Fiber optics opens window on stream dynamics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L24401, doi:10.1029/2006GL027979. (Pubitemid 47277784)
132. Singh, V. P., and D. K. Frevert (2002a), Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, 972 pp., Water Resources Pub., Highland Ranch, CO.
133. Singh, V. P., and D. K. Frevert (2002b), MathematicalModels of LargeWatershed Hydrology, 914 pp.,Water Resources Pub., Highland Ranch, CO.
134. Sivakumar, B. (2008), Dominant processes concept, model simplification and classification framework in catchment hydrology, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 22, 737-748, doi:10. 1007/s00477-007-0183-5.
135. Sivapalan, M. (2005), Pattern, process and function: Elements of a new unified hydrologic theory at the catchment scale, in Encyclopaedia of Hydrologic Sciences, vol. 13(1\1), edited by M. G. Anderson, pp. 193- 219, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
136. Sivapalan, M. (2009), The secret to ''doing better hydrological science'': Change the question!, Hydrol. Process., 23, 1391-1396.
137. Sivapalan, M., K. Beven, and E. F. Wood (1987), On hydrologic similarity: 2. A scaled model of storm runoff production, Water Resour. Res., 23, 2266-2278, doi:10.1029/WR023i012p02266. (Pubitemid 18536161)
138. Sivapalan, M., G. Blöschl, L. Zhang, and R. Vertessy (2003), Downward approach to hydrological prediction, Hydrol. Process., 17(11), 2101-2111. (Pubitemid 37106047)
139. Slater, A. G., et al. (2001), The representation of snow in land surface schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d), J. Hydrometeor., 2, 7-25.
140. Smith, T. J., and L. A. Marshall (2010), Exploring uncertainty and model predictive performance concepts via a modular snowmelt-runoff modeling framework, Environ. Modell. Software, 25(6), 691-701.
141. Son, K., and M. Sivapalan (2007), Improving model structure and reducing parameter uncertainty in conceptual water balance models through the use of auxiliary data, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01415, doi:10.1029/ 2006WR005032.
142. Soulsby, C., C. Neal, H. Laudon, D. A. Burns, P. Merot, M. Bonell, S. M. Dunn, and D. Tetzlaff (2008), Catchment data for process conceptualization: Simply not enough?, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2057-2061. (Pubitemid 351983236)
143. Stedinger, J. R., R. M. Vogel, S. U. Lee, and R. Batchelder (2008), Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B06, doi:10.1029/2008WR006822.
144. Tarantola, A. (2005), Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation, 342 pp., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA.
145. Tetzlaff, D., J. J. McDonnell, S. Uhlenbrook, K. J. McGuire, P. W. Bogaart, F. Naef, A. J. Baird, S. M. Dunn, and C. Soulsby (2008), Conceptualizing catchment processes: Simply too complex?, Hydrol. Process., 22, 1727-1730, doi:10.1002/hyp.7069. (Pubitemid 351766950)
146. Troch, P. A., G. A. Carrilo, I. Heidbuchel, S. Rajagopal, M. Switanek, T. H. M. Volkman, and M. Yaeger (2009), Dealing with landscape heterogeneity in watershed hydrology: A review of recent progress toward new hydrological theory, Geography Compass, 3, 375-392.
147. Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J., and J. J. McDonnell (2006a), On the interrelations between topography, soil depth, soil moisture, transpiration rates and species distribution at the hillslope scale, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 293-310, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.02.016. (Pubitemid 43019348)
148. Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J., and J. J. McDonnell (2006b), Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147-storm analysis of the Panola hillslope, Water Resour. Res., W02410, doi:10.1029/2004WR003778.
149. Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J., and J. J. McDonnell (2006c), Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02411, doi:10.1029/2004WR003800.
150. Tyler, S. W., J. S. Selker, M. B. Hausner, C. E. Hatch, T. Torgersen, C. E. Thodal, and S. G. Schladow (2009), Environmental temperature sensing using Raman spectra DTS fiber-optic methods, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00D23, doi:10.1029/2008WR007052.
151. Uhlenbrook, S., J. Seibert, C. Leibundgut, and A. Rodhe (1999), Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structure, Hydrol. Sci. J., 44(5), 779-797. (Pubitemid 30037325)
152. Uhlenbrook, S., S. Roser, and N. Tilch (2004), Hydrological process representation at the meso-scale : The potential of a distributed, conceptual catchment model, J. Hydrol., 291(3-4), 278-296. (Pubitemid 38527209)
153. Vaché, K. B., and J. J. McDonnell (2006), A process-based rejectionist framework for evaluating catchment runoff model structure, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02409, doi:10.1029/2005WR004247.
154. VanderKwaak, J. E., and K. Loague (2001), Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model, Water Resour. Res., 37, 999-1013, doi:10.1029/2000WR900272. (Pubitemid 32516053)
155. van Dijk, A. I. J. M. (2010), Selection of an appropriately simple storm runoff model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 447-458.
156. Villarini, G., P. Mandapaka, W. F. Krajewski, and R. Moore (2008), Rainfall and sampling uncertainties: A rain gauge perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11102, doi:10.1029/2007JD009214.
157. Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, M. P. Clark, J. M. Hyman, and B. A. Robinson (2008), Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B09, doi:10.1029/2007WR006720.
158. Wagener, T., M. J. Lees, and H. S. Wheater (2002), A toolkit for the development and application of parsimonious hydrological models, in Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology, Volume 2, edited by V. P. Singh, D. K. Frevert, and D. Meyer, Water Resources Publications, Colorado, USA.
159. Wagener, T., M. Sivapalan, P. Troch, and R. Woods (2007), Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity, Geography Compass, 1, doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.
160. Weiler, M., and J. J. McDonnell (2004), Virtual experiments : A new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology, J. Hydrol., 285, 3-18. (Pubitemid 38078303)
161. Western, A. W., S. L. Zhou, R. B. Grayson, T. A. McMahon, G. Blöschl, and D. J. Wilson (2004), Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes, J. Hydrol., 286, 113-134. (Pubitemid 38203952)
162. Willems, P. (2001), Stochastic description of the rainfall input errors in lumped hydrological models, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 15(2), 132-152. 10.1007/s004770000063.
163. Wood, E. F., et al. (1998), The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons, Global and Planetary Change, 19, 115-135, doi:10.1016/S0921- 8181(98)00044-7. (Pubitemid 28490039)
164. Yilmaz, K. K., H. V. Gupta, and T. Wagener (2008), A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W02501, doi:10.1029/ 2008WR007347.
165. Young, P. (1998), Data-based mechanistic modelling of environmental, ecological, economic and engineering systems, Environ. Modell. Software, 13(2), 105-122. (Pubitemid 28514812)
166. Young, P. (2003), Top-down and data-based mechanistic modelling of rainfall-flow dynamics at the catchment scale, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2195-2217. (Pubitemid 37106051)
167. Young, P. C., and H. Garnier (2006), Identification and estimation of continuous- time, data-based mechanistic (DBM) models for environmental systems, Environ. Modell. Software, 21, 1055-1072.
168. Young, P. C., and M. Ratto (2009), A unified approach to environmental systems modeling, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(7), 1037-1057.
169. Young, P., S. Parkinson, and M. Lees (1996), Simplicity out of complexity in environmental modelling: Occam's razor revisited, J. Appl. Statistics, 23(2-3), 165-210.
170. Zreda, M., D. Desilets, T. P. A. Ferre, and R. L. Scott (2008), Measuring soil moisture content non-invasively at intermediate spatial scale using cosmic-ray neutrons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L21402, doi:10.1029/ 2008GL035655.