A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation

Water Resources Research

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2007, Pages

  Qu, Yizhong ^a   Duffy, Christopher J ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL FLOW; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; SOIL MOISTURE;

CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA; HYDROLOGIC MODEL; MICROTOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; WATER CYCLE;

WATERSHEDS;

CHANNEL FLOW; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; SOIL MOISTURE; WATERSHEDS;

CHANNEL FLOW; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; OVERLAND FLOW; PEAK FLOW; RIVER BASIN; SOIL MOISTURE; WATER TABLE; WATERSHED;

NORTH AMERICA; PENNSYLVANIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34848829169     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005752     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbott, M. B., J. A. Bathurst, and P. E. Cunge (1986a), An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Systeme Hydrologicque Europeen "SHE": part 1. History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modeling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 45-59.
2. Abbott, M. B., J. A. Bathurst, and P. E. Cunge (1986b), An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Systeme Hydrologicque Europeen "SHE": part 2. Structure of a physically based distributed modeling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 61-77.
3. Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith (1998), Crop evapotranspiration, FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap. 56, United Nations Food and Agric. Organ., Rome.
4. Amerman, C. R. (1965), The use of unit-source watershed data for runoff prediction, Water Resour. Res., 1(4), 499-508.
5. Ascher, U. M., and L. R. Petzold (1998), Computer Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations and Differential Algebraic Equations, Soc. for Ind. and Appl. Math., Philadelphia, Pa.
6. Beven, K. (2006), Searching for the holy grail of scientific hydrology: Qt = H(SR)A as closure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 3, 769-792.
7. Bierkens, M. F. P. (1998), Modeling water table fluctuations by means of a stochastic differential equation, Water Resour. Res., 34(10), 2485-2499.
8. Brandes, D. (1998), A low-dimensional dynamical model of hillslope soil moisture, with application to a semiarid field site, Ph.D. thesis, Pa. State Univ., University Park.
9. Bras, R. L. (1990), Hydrology: An Introduction to Hydrologic Science, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass.
10. Brooks, R. H., and A. T. Corey (1964), Hydraulic properties of porous media, Hydrol. Pap. 3, Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins.
11. Cohen, S. D., and A. C. Hindmarsh (1994), CVODE user guide, Rep. UCRL-MA-118618, Numer. Math. Group, Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab., Livermore, Calif.
12. Crawford, N. H., and R. K. Linsley (1966), Digital simulation on hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model IV, Stanford Univ. Tech. Rep. 39, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, Calif.
13. Delanunay, B. (1934), Sur la sphere vide, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Class Sci. Math. Nat., 7(6), 793-800.
14. Dingman, S. L. (1994), Physical Hydrology, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
15. Du, Q., V. Faber, and M. Gunzburger (1999), Centroidal Voronoi tessalations: Applications and algorithms, SIAM Rev., 41(4), 637-676.
16. Duffy, C. J. (1996), A two-state integral-balance model for soil moisture and groundwater dynamics in complex terrain, Water Resour. Res., 32(8), 2421-2434.
17. Duffy, C. J. (2004), Semi-discrete dynamical model for mountain-front recharge and water balance estimation, Rio Grande of southern Colorado and New Mexico, in Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment: The Southwestern United States, Water Sci. Appl. Ser., vol. 9, edited by J. F. Hogan et al., pp. 255-271, AGU, Washington, D. C.
18. Dunne, T., and R. D. Black (1970a), An experimental investigation of runoff production in permeable soils, Water Resour. Res., 6(2), 478-490.
19. Dunne, T., and R. D. Black (1970b), Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed, Water Resour. Res., 6(5), 1296-1311.
20. Freeze, R. A., and R. L. Harlan (1969), Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologie response model, J. Hydrol., 9, 237-258.
21. Gardner, W. R. (1958), Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table, Soil Sci., 85, 228-232.
22. Gottardi, G., and M. Venutelli (1993), A control-volume finite-element model for two-dimensional overland flow, Adv. Water Resour., 16, 277-284.
23. Hauser, G. E. (2003), River modeling system user guide aid technical reference, report, Tenn. Valley Auth., Norris, Tenn.
24. Kristensen, K. J., and S. E. Jensen (1975), A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration, Nord Hydrol., 6, 170-188.
25. LaBolle, E. M., A. A. Ayman, and E. F. Graham (2003), Review of the integrated groundwater and surface-water model (IGSM), Ground Water, 41(2), 238-246.
26. Leveque, R. J. (2002), Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
27. Lynch, J. A. (1976), Effects of antecedent moisture on storage hydrographs, Ph.D. thesis, 192 pp., Dep. of Forestry, Pa. State Univ., University Park.
28. Lynch, J. A., and W. Corbett (1985), Source-area variability during peakflow, in watershed management in the 80's, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 300-307.
29. Madsen, N. K. (1975), The method of lines for the numerical solution of partial differential equations, in Proceedings of the SIGNUM Meeting on Software for Partial Differential Equations, pp. 5-7, ACM Press, New York.
30. Maidment, D. R. (2002), Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources, 140 pp., ESRI Press, Redlands, Calif.
31. Palacios-Velez, O. L., and B. Duevas-Renaud (1986), Automated river-course, ridge and basin delineation from digital elevation data, J. Hydrol., 86, 299-314.
32. Palacios-Velez, O., W. Gandoy-Bernasconi, and B. Cuevas-Renaud (1998), Geometric analysis of surface runoff and the computation order of unit elements in distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 211, 266-274.
33. Panday, S., and P. S. Huyakorn (2004), A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow, Adv. Water Resour., 27, 361-382.
34. Polis, M. F., and D. M. McKeown (1993), Issues in iterative TIN generation to support large scale simulations, paper presented at 11th International Symposium on Computer Assisted Cartography (AUTOCARTO11), Minneapolis, Minn.
35. Post, D. E., and L. G. Votta (2005), Computational science demands a new paradigm, Phys. Today, 58(1), 35-41.
36. Qu, Y. (2005), An integrated hydrologic model for multi-process simulation using semi-discrete finite volume approach, Ph.D. thesis, 136 pp., Civ. and Environ. Eng. Dep., Pa. State Univ., Univ. Park.
37. Reggiani, P., and T. H. M. Rientjes (2005), Flux parameterization in the representative elementary watershed approach: Application to a natural basin, Water Resour. Res., 41, W04013, doi:10.1029/2004WR003693.
38. Reggiani, P., M. Sivapalan, and M. Hassanizadeh (1998), A unilying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy, and the second law of thermodynamics, Adv. Water Res., 22, 367-398.
39. Reggiani, P., M. Hassanizadeh, M. Sivapalan, and W. G. Gray (1999), A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Constitutive relationships, Adv. Water Res., 23, 15-39.
40. Shewchuk, J. R. (1997), Delaunay refinement mesh generation, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa.
41. Sivapalan, M., C. Jothityangkoon, and M. Menabde (2002), Linearity and non-linearity of basin response as a function of scale: Discussion of alternative definitions, Water Resour. Res., 38(2), 1012, doi:10.1029/2001WR000482.
42. Slattery, J. (1978), Momentum, Energy, and Mass Transfer in Continua, Krieger, Melbourne, Fla.
43. Sleigh, P. A., P. H. Gaskell, M. Berzins, and N. G. Wright (1998), An unstructured finite-volume algorithm for predicting flow in rivers and estuaries, Comput Fluids, 27(4), 479-508.
44. Tarboton, D. G., R. L. Bras, and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe (1991), Or the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data, Hydrol. Processes, 5, 81-100.
45. VanderKwaak, J. E., and K. Loague (2001), Hydrologic response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model, Water Resour. Res., 37(4), 999-1013.
46. van Genuchten, M. T. (1980), A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892-898.
47. Vivoni, E. R., V. Y. Ivanov, R. L. Bras, and D. Entekhabi (2004), Generation of triangulated irregular networks based on hydrological similarity, J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(4), 288-302.
48. Voronoi, G. (1907), Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques, J. Reine Angewandte Math., 133, 97-178.
49. Yeh, G. T., H. P. Cheng, J. R. Cheng, H. C. Lin, and W. D. Martin (1998), A numerical model simulating water flow, contaminant and sediment transport in a watershed systems of 1-D stream-river network, 2-D overland regime, and 3-D subsurface media (WASH123D: Version 1.0), Tech. Rep. CHL-98-19, U. S. Environ. Prot. Agency Environ. Res. Lab., Athens, Ga.