Hydrological process representation at the meso-scale: The potential of a distributed, conceptual catchment model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 291, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 278-296

  Uhlenbrook, Stefan ^a   Roser, Stefan ^a   Tilch, Nils ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dissolved silica; Model validation; Rainfall runoff modelling; Runoff generation; Tracer aided catchment model; Tracer data

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; MODAL ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY); RUNOFF;

PROCESS-ORIENTED SIMULATION; VARIABLES;

HYDROLOGY;

CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; MODEL VALIDATION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; TRACER;

EID: 1942502429     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.038     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. Ambroise B., Perrin J.L., Reutenauer D. Multicriterion validation of a semidistributed conceptual model of the water cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France). Water Resour. Res. 31:1995;1467-1481
2. Anderson M.G., Burt T.P. Process Studies in Hillslope Hydrology. 1990;Wiley, Chichester
3. Bárdossy A., Bronstert A., Buiteveld H., Busch, N., Disse, M., Engel, H., Fritsch, U., Hundecha, Y., Lammersen, R., Niehoff, D., Ritter, N., 2002. LAHoR - Quantifizierung des Einflusses der Landoberfläche und der Ausbaumaßnahmen am Gewässer auf die Hochwasserbedingungen im Rheingebiet. Project Report, IRMA-Code3/DU/1/002, 76 pp.
4. Barnes H.H. Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1849. 1967;US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
5. Bergström, S., 1992. The HBV model - its structure and applications. SMHI, RH, 4, Norrköping, Schweden.
6. Bergström S., Carlsson B., Sandberg G., Maxe L. Integrated modelling of runoff, alkalinity and pH on a daily base. Nord. Hydrol. 16:1985;89-104
7. Beven K.J. A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. Abbott M.B., Refsgaard J.C. Distributed Hydrological Modelling. 1996;255-278 Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Niederlande
8. Beven K.J. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling. The Primer. 2001;Wiley, Chichester. 360 pp
9. Beven K.J., Binley A. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Process. 6:1992;279-298
10. Beven K.J., Kirkby M.J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24:(1):1979;43-70
11. Blöschl G. Scale and scaling in hydrology. Wiener Mitteilungen, Wasser-Abwasser-Gewässer, 132. 1996;Wien, Österreich
12. Blöschl G., Sivapalan M. Scale issues in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrol. Process. 9:1995;251-290
13. Chow V.T., Maidment D.R., Mays L.W. Applied hydrology. McGRaw-Hill Serious in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. 1988;McGraw-Hill, New York
14. Christophersen N.C., Neal C., Hooper R.P., Vogt R.D., Andersen S. Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members - a step towards second-generation acidification models. J. Hydrol. 116:1990;307-320
15. van Dam, J.C., 2000. Field-scale water flow and solute transport: SWAP model concepts, parameter estimation and case studies. PhD thesis, Wageningen Institute for Environment and Climate Research, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
16. DVWK (Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau e.V.), 1996. Ermittlung der Verdunstung von Land- und Wasserflächen. Merkblätter zur Wasserwirtschaft, 238. Bonn.
17. Eisele M., Kiese R., Krämer A., Leibundgut C. Application of a catchment water quality model for assessment and prediction of nitrogen budgets. Phys. Chem. Earth. 26:(7-8):2001;547-551
18. Franks S., Gineste P., Beven K.J., Merot P. On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process. Water Resour. Res. 34:(4):1998;787-797
19. FVA (Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Baden-Württemberg), 1994. Erläuterungen zu den Standortskarten des Forstbezirks Kirchzarten. Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Freiburg, Abteilung Botanik und Standortskunde.
20. GLA (Geologisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg), 1981. Erläuterungen zur geologischen Karte 1:50.000 Freiburg i. Br. und Umgebung. Geologisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg (geological survey Baden-Württemberg), 354 pp.
21. Grayson R.B., Moore I.D., McMahon T.A. Physically based hydrologic modeling, 2. Is the concept realistic? Water Resour. Res. 26:(10):1992;2659-2666
22. Güntner, A., Uhlenbrook, S., Seibert, J. and Leibundgut, C., 1999a. Estimation of saturation excess overland flow areas- comparison of topographic index calculations with field mapping. IAHS no. 254, 203-210.
23. Güntner A., Uhlenbrook S., Seibert J., Leibundgut C. Multi-criterial validation of TOPMODEL in a mountainous catchment. Hydrol. Process. 13:1999;1603-1620
24. Hoeg S., Uhlenbrook S., Leibundgut C. Hydrograph separation in a mountainous catchment - combining hydrochemical and isotopic tracers. Hydrol. Process. 14:2000;1199-1216
25. Hooper R.P., Shoemaker C.A. A comparison of chemical and isotopic hydrograph separation. Water Resour. Res. 22:1986;1444-1454
26. Jakeman A.J., Hornberger G.M. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model. Water Resour. Res. 29:(8):1993;2637-2649
27. Karssenberg D. The value of environmental modelling languages for building distributed hydrological models. Hydrol. Process. 16:2004;2751-2766
28. Karssenberg D., Burrough P.A., Sluiter R., de Jong K. The PCRaster software and course materials for teaching numerical modelling in the environmental sciences. Trans. GIS. 5:(2):2001;99-110
29. Kendall C., McDonnell J.J. Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology. 1998;Elsevier, Amsterdam
30. Kienzler, P. 2001. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur chemischen Zusammensetzung oberflächennaher unterirdischer Abflusskomponenten im Bruggaeinzugsgebiet. Diploma thesis, University of Freiburg, Institute of Hydrology, Germany, 116 pp.
31. Klemes V. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrol. Sci. J. 31:(1):1986;13-24
32. Kuczera G., Mroczkowski M. Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of data. Water Resour. Res. 34:(6):1998;1481-1489
33. Lamb R., Beven K.J., Myrabo S. Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall-runoff model. Adv. Water Resour. 22:1998;305-317
34. Leavesley G.H., Lichty R.W., Troutman B., Saindon L.G. Precipitation runoff modelling system. User's manual. USGS Water Resources Investigations, Report 83-4238. 1983
35. Lindenlaub, M., Leibundgut, C., Mehlhorn, J., Uhlenbrook, S., 1997. Interactions of hard rock aquifers and debris cover for runoff generation. IAHS Publ. no. 241, 63-74.
36. Lischeid G., Uhlenbrook S. Checking a process-based catchment model by artificial neural networks. Hydrol. Process. 17:(2):2003;265-267
37. Lundquist D., Christophersen N., Neal C. Towards developing a new short-term model for the Birkenes catchment - lessons learned. J. Hydrol. 116:1990;391-401
38. Maloszewski P., Zuber A. Lumped parameter models for the interpretation of environmental tracer data. Manual on Mathematical Models in Isotope Hydrogeology. 1996;International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. pp. 9-58
39. McDonnell J.J. A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. Water Resour. Res. 26:1990;2821-2832
40. Mehlhorn, J., 1999. Tracerhydrologische Ansätze in der Niederschlags-Abfluss-Modellierung. PhD Thesis, Freiburger Schriften zur Hydrologie, Band 9, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
41. Mehlhorn, J., Armbruster, F., Uhlenbrook, S., Leibundgut, C., 1998. Determination of the geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph using tracer experiments in a headwater basin. IAHS Publ. no.248, 327-335.
42. Menzel, L., 1997. Modellierung der Evapotranspiration im System Boden-Pflanze-Atmosphäre. PhD thesis, Züricher Geographische Hefte, 67, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
43. Montgomery D.R., Dietrich W.E., Torres R., Anderson S.P., Heffner J.T., Loague K. Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall. Water Resour. Res. 33:(1):1997;91-109
44. Mroczkowski M., Raper G.P., Kuczera G. The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models. Water Resour. Res. 33:1997;2325-2335
45. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10:1970;282-290
46. Peschke, G., Etzenberg, C., Müller, G., Töpfer, J., Zimmermann, S., 1999. Das wissensbasiert System FLAB - ein Instrument zur rechnergestützten Bestimmung von Landschaftseinheiten mit gleicher Abflussbildung (The knowledge based system FLAB - an instrument for computer aided determination of landscape units with the same runoff generation; in German). IHI-Schriften, Heft 10, IHI Zittau, Zittau, Germany.
47. Refsgaard J.C., Storm B. Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models. Abbott M.B., Refsgaard J.C. Distributed Hydrological Modelling. 1996;41-54 Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Niederlande
48. Rutenberg, E., Uhlenbrook, S., Leibundgut, Ch., 1999. Spatial delineation of zones with the same dominating runoff generation processes. IAHS Publ. no. 258, 281-284.
49. Scherrer S., Naef F. A decision scheme to indicate dominant hydrological flow processes on temperate grassland. Hydrol. Process. 17:(2):2003;391-401
50. Schulla, J., 1997. Hydrologische Modellierung von Fluß einzugsgebieten zur Abschätzung der Folgen von Klimaänderungen. Züricher Geographische Hefte, 65. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
51. Seibert, J., 1999. Conceptual runoff models - fiction or representation of reality? PhD thesis, Uppsala, Schweden.
52. Seibert J., McDonnell J. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: use of soft data for multi-criteria model calibration. Water Resour. Res. 38:(11):2004;1231-1241
53. Singh V.P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. 1995;Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA
54. Smith R.E., Goodrich D.C., Woolhiser D.A., Unkrich C.L. KINEROS - A KINematic Runoff and EROSion Model. Singh V.P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. 1995;697-732 Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA
55. Tilch N., Uhlenbrook S., Leibundgut C. Regionalisierungsverfahren zur Ausweisung von Hydrotopen in von periglazialem Hangschutt geprägten Gebieten. Grundwasser. 7/4:2002;206-216
56. Uhlenbrook. Untersuchung und Modellierung der Abflußbildung in einem mesoskaligen Einzugsgebiet. Freiburger Schriften zur Hydrologie, 10. 1999;Universität Freiburg, Freiburg
57. Uhlenbrook S. An empirical approach for delineating spatial units with the same dominating runoff generation processes. Phys. Chem. Earth. 28:2004;297-303
58. Uhlenbrook S., Hoeg S. Quantifying uncertainties in tracer-based hydrograph separations: a case study for two-, three- and five-component hydrograph separations in a mountainous catchment. Hydrol. Process. 17:(2):2003;431-453
59. Uhlenbrook S., Leibundgut C. Process-oriented catchment modelling and multiple-response validation. Hydrol. Process. 16:2002;423-440
60. Uhlenbrook S., Seibert J., Leibundgut C., Rodhe A. Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems to identify model parameters and structure. Hydrol. Sci. J. 44:(5):1999;279-299
61. Uhlenbrook S., Frey M., Leibundgut C., Maloszewski P. Hydrograph separations in a mesoscale mountainous basin at event and seasonal timescales. Water Resour. Res. 38:(6):2002;1-14
62. Uhlenbrook S., Didszun J., Leibundgut C. Runoff generation processes on hillslopes and their susceptibility to global change. Huber U. Mountain Research Initiative - Global Change and Mountain Regions. 2004;Springer, New York. in press
63. US-EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1998. Better assessment science integrating point and non-point source pollution. BASINS, Version 2.0, User's manual, Washington, DC, USA.
64. Vogt T., Lenco M. Wetland mapping and monitoring in the Rhine alluvial plain (Alcace, France). Sistema Terra. 4:1995;75-78