Overall distributed model intercomparison project results

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 298, Issue 1-4, 2004, Pages 27-60

  Reed, Seann ^a,b   Koren, Victor ^a   Smith, Michael ^a   Zhang, Ziya ^a   Moreda, Fekadu ^a   Seo, Dong Jun ^a  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NOAAWeather Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributed hydrologic modeling; Hydrologic simulation; Model intercomparison; Radar precipitation; Rainfall runoff

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RIVERS; SOILS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STREAM FLOW; WEATHER FORECASTING;

FLOOD EVENT STATISTICS; SOIL CHARACTERISTICS;

HYDROLOGY;

CALIBRATION; FORECASTING METHOD; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PEAK FLOW; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; STREAMFLOW;

EID: 4143112490     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Anderson, E., (2003). Calibration of Conceptual Hydrologic Models for Use in River Forecasting (copy available on request from: Hydrology Laboratory, Office of Hydrologic Development, NOAA/National Weather Service, (1325) East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910).
2. Andersen J., Refsgaard J.C., Jensen H.J. Distributed hydrological modeling of the senegal river basin-model construction and validation. Journal of Hydrology. 247:2001;200-214
3. Bandaragoda C., Tarboton D., Woods R. Application of topmodel in the distributed model intercomparison Project. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 178-201
4. Boyle D.P., Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., Koren V., Zhang Z., Smith M. Toward Improved Streamflow Forecasts: Value of Semi-distributed Modeling. Water Resources Research. 37:(11):2001;2749-2759
5. Burnash R.J. The NWS river forecast system - catchment modeling. Singh V.P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. 1995;311-366 Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO
6. Burnash R.J., Ferral R.L., McGuire R.A. A Generalized Streamflow Simulation System Conceptual Modeling for Digital Computers, US Department of Commerce National Weather Service and State of California Department of Water. 1973
7. Butts M.B., Payne J.T., Kristensen M., Madsen H. An Evaluation of the impact of model structure and complexity on hydrologic modelling uncertainty for streamflow prediction. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 242-266
8. Carpenter T.M., Georgakakos K.P. Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow simulations of a distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 202-221
9. Carpenter T.M., Georgakakos K.P., Spersflagea J.A. On the parametric and NEXRAD-radar sensitivities of a distributed hydrologic model suitable for operational use. Journal of Hydrology. 253:2001;169-193
10. Christiaens K., Feyen J. Use of sensitivity and uncertainty measures in distributed hydrological modeling with an application to the MIKE SHE model. Water Resources Research. 38:(9):2002;1169
11. Clark C.O. Storage and the unit hydrograph. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers. 110:1945;1419-1446
12. Finnerty B.D., Smith M.B., Seo D.J., Koren V., Moglen G.E. Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs. Journal of Hydrology. 203:1997;21-38
13. Fulton R.A., Breidenbach J.P., Seo D.J., Miller D.A., O'Bannon T. The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Weather and Forecasting. 13:1998;377-395
14. Guo J., Liang X., Leung L.R. Impacts of different precipitation data sources on water budget simulated by the VIC-3L hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 311-334
15. Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., Hogue T.S., Boyle D.P. Duan Q., Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., Rousseau A., Turcotte R. Advances in Automatic Calibration of Watershed Models. Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Science and Application 6. 2003;9-28 American Geophysical Union
16. Havno K., Madsen M.N., Dorge J. Mike 11 - A Generalized River Modelling Package. Singh V.P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. 1995;733-782 Water Resources Publications, Colorado, USA
17. Ivanov V.Y., Vivoni E.R., Bras R.L., Entekhabi D. Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: a fully-distributed physically-based approach. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 80-111
18. Johnson D., Smith M., Koren V., Finnerty B. Comparing mean areal precipitation estimates from NEXRAD and rain gauge networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engneering. 4:(2):1999;117-124
19. Khodatalab N., Gupta H., Wagener T., Sorooshian S. Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 112-135
20. Koren, V, Schaake, J., Duan, Q., Smith, M., Cong, S., September (1998). PET Upgrades to NWSRFS - Project Plan, HRL Internal Report, (copy available on request from: Hydrology Laboratory, Office of Hydrologic Development, NOAA/National Weather Service, 1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910).
21. Koren V.I., Finnerty B.D., Schaake J.C., Smith M.B., Seo D.J., Duan Q.Y. Scale dependencies of hydrologic models to spatial variability of precipitation. Journal of Hydrology. 217:1999;285-302
22. Koren V., Smith M., Duan Q. Use of a priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfall-runoff models. Duan Q., Sorooshian S., Gupta H., Rosseau A., Turcotte R. Calibration of Watershed Models. AGU Water Science and Applications Series. 2003
23. Koren V., Reed S., Smith M., Zhang Z., Seo D.J. Hydrology Laboratory Research Modeling System (HL-RMS) of the US National Weather Service. Journal. of Hydrology. 291:2004;297-318
24. Kouwen N., Garland G. Resolution considerations in using radar rainfall data for flood forecasting. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 16:1989;279-289
25. Kouwen N., Soulis E.D., Pietroniro A., Donald J., Harrington R.A. Grouped Response units for distributed hydrologic modelling. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 119:(3):1993;289-305
26. Leavesley G.H., Hay L.E., Viger R.J., Markstrom S.L. Use of a priori parameter-estimation methods to constrain calibration of distributed-parameter models. Duan Q., Sorooshian S., Gupta H., Rosseau A., Turcotte R. Calibration of Watershed Models. AGU Water Science and Applications Series. 2003
27. Liang X., Xie Z. A new surface runoff parameterization with subgrid-scale soil heterogeneity for land surface models. Advances in Water Resources. 24:2001;1173-1193
28. Liang X., Lettenmaier D.P., Wood E.F., Burges S.J. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research. 99:(D7):1994;14,415-14,428
29. Madsen H. Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Advances in Water Resources. 26:2003;205-216
30. McCuen R.H., Snyder W.M. A proposed index for comparing hydrographs. Water Resources Research. 11:(6):1975;1021-1024
31. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology. 10:1970;282-290
32. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G, Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., King, K.W., 2000. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2000, Texas Water Resources Institute (TWRI), Report TR-191, College Station, TX, 506pp.
33. Refsgaard J.C., Knudsen J. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research. 32:(7):1996;2189-2202
34. Senarath S.U.S., Ogden F.L., Downer C.W., Sharif H.O. On the calibration and verification of two-dimensional, distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models. Water Resources Research. 36:(6):2000;1510-1595
35. Seo D.-J., Breidenbach J.P. Real-time correction of spatially nonuniform bias in radar rainfall using rain gage measurements. J. Hydrometeorology. 3:2002;93-111
36. Seo D.-J., Breidenbach J.P., Johnson E.R. Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data. Journal of Hydrology. 223:1999;131-147
37. Seo D.-J., Breidenbach J.P., Fulton R.A., Miller D.A., O'Bannon T. Real-time adjustment of range-dependent biases in WSR-88D rainfall data due to nonuniform vertical profile of reflectivity. Journal of Hydrometeorology. 1:(3):2000;222-240
38. Smith M.B., Koren V., Johnson D., Finnerty B.D., Seo D.-J. Distributed Modeling: Phase 1 Results. NOAA Technical Report NWS 44. 1999;National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory. 210 pp. Copies available upon request
39. Smith M.B., Laurine D., Koren V., Reed S., Zhang Z. Hydrologic model calibration in the National Weather Service. Duan Q., Sorooshian S., Gupta H., Rosseau A., Turcotte R. Calibration of Watershed Models. AGU Water Science and Applications Series. 2003
40. Smith M.B., Koren V.I., Zhang Z., Reed S.M., Pan J.-J., Moreda F., Kuzmin V. Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: an analysis of observed data. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 267-286
41. Smith M.B., Seo D.-J., Koren V.I., Reed S., Zhang Z., Duan Q.-Y., Cong S., Moreda F., Anderson R. The Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP): Motivation and Experiment Design. Journal of Hydrology. 2004;. 298(1-4), 4-26
42. Sweeney, T.L., 1992. Modernized Areal Flash Flood Guidance, NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS Hydro 44, Silver Spring, MD.
43. Vieux B.E. Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS. Water Science and Technology Series. vol. 38:2001;Kluwer, Norwell, MA. 293 pp. ISBN 0-7923-7002-3
44. Vieux B.E., Moreda F. Ordered Physics-Based Parameter Adjustment of a Distributed Model. Duan Q., Sorooshian S., Gupta H., Rosseau A., Turcotte R. Calibration of Watershed Models. AGU Water Science and Applications Series. 2003
45. Wang, D., Smith, M.B., Zhang, Z., Reed, S., Koren, V., 2000. Statistical comparison of mean areal precipitation estimates from WSR-88D, operational and historical gage networks, 15th Conference on Hydrology, AMS, January 9-14, Long Beach, CA.
46. Young C.B., Bradley A.A., Krajewski W.F., Kruger A. Evaluating NEXRAD Multisensor precipitation estimates for operational hydrologic forecasting. Journal of Hydrometeorology. 1:2000;241-254
47. Zhang Z., Koren V., Smith M., Reed S., Wang D. Use of next generation weather radar data and basin disaggregation to improve continuous hydrograph simulations. Journal of Hydrologic Engneering. 9:(2):2004;103-115