Selection of an appropriately simple storm runoff model

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 447-458

  Van Dijk, A I J M ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASEFLOW; CATCHMENT; MODEL TEST; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PRECIPITATION INTENSITY; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; WATER STORAGE;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 77949360965     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-14-447-2010     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akaike, H.: Statistical predictor identification Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 22, 203-217, doi:10.1007/BF02506337, 1970.
2. Beck, H. E., De Jeu, R. A. M., Schellekens, J., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Improving Curve Number based storm runoff estimates using soil moisture proxies, IEEE J. Select. Topic. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 2, 250-259, 2010.
3. Bergström, S.: The HBV model - its structure and applications, SMHI RH, 32, 1992.
4. Beven, K.: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling, Adv. Water Res., 16, 41-51, 1993.
5. Beven, K. J.: Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester, 360 pp., 2004.
6. Beven, K. J. E.: Streamflow generation processes, Benchmark Papers in Hydrology, edited by: McDonnell, J. J., IAHS, Wallingford, UK, 431 pp., 2006.
7. Blöschl, G.: 133: Rainfall-runoff modeling in ungauged catchments, Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2061-2080, 2005.
8. Chiew, F. H. S., Peel, M. C., and Western, A. W.: Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD, in: Mathematical Models of SmallWatershed Hydrology and Applications edited by: Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K., Water resources Publication Littleton, Colorado, USA, 335-367, 2002.
9. Criss, R. E. and Winston, W. E.: Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals, Hydrol. Proc., 22, 2723-2725, 2008.
10. Dunne, T. and Black, R. D.: Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed, Water Resour. Res., 6, 1296-1311, 1970.
11. Guerschman, J.-P., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., McVicar, T. R., Van Niel, T.G., Li, L., Liu, Y., and Peña-Arancibia, J.: Water balance estimates from satellite observations over the Murray-Darling Basin, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia, 93 pp., 2008.
12. Guerschman, J. P., Van Dijk, A., Mattersdorf, G., Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Leuning, R., Pipunic, R. C., and Sherman, B. S.: Scaling of potential evapotranspiration with MODIS data reproduces flux observations and catchment water balance observations across Australia, J. Hydrol., 369, 107-119, 2009.
13. Jakeman, A. J. and Hornberger, G. M.: How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?, Water Resour. Res., 29, 2637-2649, 1993.
14. Jeffrey, S. J., Carter, J. O., Moodie, K. B., and Beswick, A. R.: Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data, Environ. Model. Softw., 16, 309-330, 2001.
15. Kirkby, M. J. E.: Hillslope hydrology, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 389 pp., 1978.
16. Latron, J. and Gallart, F.: Runoff generation processes in a small Mediterranean research catchment (Vallcebre, Eastern Pyrenees), J. Hydrol., 358, 206-220, 2008.
17. Legates, D. R. and McCabe, G. J.: Evaluating the use of goodness of fit measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241, 1999.
18. Liu, Y., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Weerts, A. H., and De Jeu, R. A. M.: Comparison of Soil Moisture Simulated by HBV96 and Estimated from TRMM Passive Microwave Observations for a Catchment in Southern NSW, Australia, MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Christchurch, NZ, 2007.
19. Maidment, D. R. E.: Handbook of Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1723-1728, 1992.
20. Mishra, S. K. and Singh, V. P.: Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology, Water Science and Technology Library, 536 pp., 2003.
21. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
22. Peel, M. C., Chiew, F. H. S., Western, A. W., and McMahon, T. A.: Extension of Unimpaired Monthly Streamflow Data and Regionalisation of Parameter Values to Estimate Streamflow in Ungauged Catchments. Report prepared for the Australian National Land andWater Resources Audit., Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology. The University of Melbourne, Australia, 37 pp., 2000.
23. Peña Arancibia, J., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Austin, J., and Stenson, M.: Predicting Changes in Streamflow and Salinity Patterns after Afforestation in the Southwest Goulburn region, Australia: An assessment of the water and salt export model 2CSalt, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australia, 104 pp., 2007.
24. Schoups, G., van de Giesen, N. C., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Model complexity control for hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B03, doi:10.1029/2008WR006836, 2008.
25. Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S. W., Gupta, V. K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., McDonnell, J. J., Mendiondo, E. M., O'Connell, P. E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J. W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E.: IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48, 857-880, doi:10.1623/hysj.48.6.857.51421, 2003.
26. Surawski, N. and Yu, B.: Alternative probabilistic exponential distributions for modelling rainfall intensity In Australia, Proceedings, MODSIM International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2005.
27. Tanaka, T.: Storm runoff processes in a small forested drainage basin, Environ. Geol., 19, 179-191, 1992.
28. Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J., and McDonnell, J. J.: Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147-storm analysis of the Panola hillslope, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02410, doi:10.1029/2004WR003778, 2006.
29. USDA-SCS: Section 4 - Hydrology, in: National Engineering Handbook, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington DC, USA, 30 pp., 1985.
30. van Dijk, A. I. J. M. and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 2. Model validation for a tropical upland mixed cropping system, J. Hydrol., 247, 239-262, 2001.
31. Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Runoff and soil loss from bench terraces. 1. An event-based model of rainfall infiltration and surface runoff, European Journal of Soil Science, 55, 299-316, 2004.
32. Van Dijk, A. I. J. M.: Selection of an appropriately simple storm runoff model, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 6, 5753-5782, 2009.
33. van Dijk, A. I. J. M.: Climate and terrain factors explaining streamflow response and recession in Australian catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 159-169, 2010, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/159/2010/.
34. Viney, N. R., Vaze, J., Chiew, F. H. S., Perraud, J.-M., Post, D. A., and Teng, J.: Comparison of multi-model and multi-donor ensembles for regionalisation of runoff generation using five lumped rainfall-runoff models, 18thWorld IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Cairns, Australia, 2009
35. Yu, B., Rose, C. W., Coughlan, K. J., and Fentie, B.: Plot-scale rainfall-runoff characteristics and modeling at six sites in Australia and Southeast Asia, Transactions of the ASAE, 40, 1295-1303, 1997.
36. Zhang, Y. and Chiew, F. H. S.: Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments, Water Resour. Res., 45, W07412, doi:10.1029/2008WR007504, 2009.