On doing better hydrological science

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 3549-3553

  Beven, Keith ^a,b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50449091346     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7108     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Andréassian V, Lerat J, Loumagne C, Mathevet T, Michel C, Oudin L, Perrin C. 2007. What is really undermining hydrologic science today? Hydrological Processes 21(20): 2819-2822.
2. Beven KJ. 1989. Changing ideas in hydrology: the case of physically based models. Journal of Hydrology 105: 157-172.
3. Beven KJ. 1997. TOPMODEL: a critique. Hydrological Processes 11(9): 1069-1086.
4. Beven KJ. 2001. How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 5: 1-12.
5. Beven KJ. 2002a. Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically-based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system. Hydrological Processes 16(2): 189-206.
6. Beven KJ. 2002b. Towards a coherent philosophy of environmental modelling. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series, A 458: 2465-2484.
7. Beven KJ. 2004a. Surface runoff at the Horton Hydrologic Laboratory (or not?). Journal of Hydrology 293: 219-234.
8. Beven KJ. 2004b. Robert Horton's perceptual model of infiltration. Hydrological Processes 18: 3447-3460.
9. Beven KJ. 2004c. Robert Horton and abrupt rises of groundwater. Hydrological Processes 18: 3687-3696.
10. Beven KJ. 2006a. On undermining the science? Hydrological Processes (HPToday) 20: 3141-3146.
11. Beven KJ. 2006b. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology 320: 18-36.
12. R←)A as closure. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 10: 609-618.
13. Beven KJ. 2008. Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future? Routledge: London.
14. Beven KJ, Binley AM. 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 6: 279-298.
15. Beven KJ, Smith PJ, Freer J. 2008. So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent? Journal of Hydrology 354: 15-32.
16. Choi HT, Beven KJ. 2007. Multi-period and Multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in distributed rainfall-runoff modelling within GLUE framework. Journal of Hydrology 332(3-4): 316-336.
17. Freer JE, Beven KJ, Peters NE. 2003. Multivariate seasonal period model rejection within the generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation procedure. In Calibration of Watershed Models, Duan Q, Gupta H, Sorooshian S, Rousseau AN, Turcotte R (eds). AGU Books: Washington, DC; 69-87.
18. Hall J, O'Connell E, Ewen J. 2007. On not undermining the science: discussion of invited commentary by Keith Beven. Hydrological Processes 21(7): 985-988.
19. Hamilton S. 2007. Just say NO to equifinality. Hydrological Processes 21(14): 1979-1980.
20. Knight FH. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton-Mifflin Co.: Boston (reprinted University of Chicago Press, 1971).
21. Mantovan P, Todini E. 2006. Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology 330: 368-381.
22. Montanari A. 2007. What do we mean by 'uncertainty'? The need for a consistent wording about uncertainty assessment in hydrology. Hydrological Processes 21: 841-845.
23. Morton A. 1993. Mathematical models: questions of trustworthiness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 659-674.
24. Page T, Beven KJ, Freer J. 2007. Modelling the chloride signal at the plynlimon catchments, wales using a modified dynamic TOPMODEL. Hydrological Processes 21: 292-307.
25. Pappenberger F, Beven KJ, Frodsham K, Romanovicz R, Matgen P. 2007. Grasping the unavoidable subjectivity in calibration of flood inundation models: a vulnerability weighted approach. Journal of Hydrology 333: 275-287.
26. Sivakumar B. 2008. Undermining the science or undermining Nature. Hydrological Processes 22: 893-897.
27. Smith PJ, Tawn J, Beven KJ. 2008. Informal likelihood measures in model assessment: theoretic development and Investigation. Advances in Water Resources. DOI:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.04.012.
28. Todini E, Mantovan P. 2007. Comment on: 'On undermining the science?' by Keith Reven. Hydrological Processes 21(12): 1633-1638.