Tools for "contributing student learning"

ACM Inroads

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 78-91

  Hamer, John ^a   Luxton Reilly, Andrew ^a   Purchase, Helen C ^b   Sheard, Judithe ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Contributing pedagogies; Educational technology

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION; CONTRIBUTING PEDAGOGIES; CREATIVE SKILLS; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; STUDENT LEARNING;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 80052060508     PISSN: 21532184     EISSN: 21532192     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1963533.1963553     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Hamer, J., et al., Contributing Student Pedagogy. inroads - SIGCSE Bulletin, 2008. 40(4): p. 194-212.
2. Wenger, E., Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. 1998: Cambridge University Press.
3. Vygotsky, L.S., Mind in Society, ed. M. Cole, et al. 1978, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Ben-Ari, M., Constructivism in Computer Science Education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 2001. 20(1): p. 45-73.
5. Cook, M., The Construction of Reality in the Child. 1955: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6. Draper, S., Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2009. 40(2): p. 285-293.
7. Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W.M. Snyder, Cultivating Communities of Practice. 2002: Harvard Business School Press
8. Smith, B.L., Creating learning communities. Liberal Learning, 1993. 79(4): p. 32-35.
9. Collis, B. and J. Moonen, An on-going journey: Technology as a learning workbench. 2005, Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
10. Sfard, A., On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educational Researcher, 1998. 27(2): p. 4-13. (Pubitemid 128056715)
11. Hattie, J., The Black Box of Tertiary Assessment: An Impending Revolution, in Tertiary Assessment & Higher Education Student Outcomes: Policy, Practice & Research, L.H. Meyer, et al., Editors. 2009, Ako Aotearoa: Wellington, New Zealand.
12. Kirschner, P.A., J. Sweller, and R. Clark, Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 2006. 41(2): p. 75-86. (Pubitemid 43837408)
13. Topping, K., Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research 1998. 68(3): p. 249-276. (Pubitemid 128376780)
14. Luxton-Reilly, A., A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment. Computer Science Education, 2009. 19(4): p. 209-232.
15. Denny, P., A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. in 10th Australasian Computing Education conference 2008. Wollongong, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.
16. Luxton-Reilly, A., et al. StudySieve: Supporting student-generated free-response. in 23rd Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (NACCQ 2010). 2010. Dunedin, New Zealand.
17. Hamer, J., et al. Quality of peer assessment in CS1. in 5th International Computing Education Research workshop. 2009. Berkley, CA, USA: ACM.
18. de Raadt, M., D. Lai, and R. Watson. An evaluation of electronic individual peer assessment in an introductory programming course. in 7th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2007). 2008. Koli National Park, Finland.
19. Søndergaard, H. Learning from and with peers: The different roles of student peer reviewing. in 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2009. Paris, France: ACM.
20. Dooley, J.F. Peer assessments using the Moodle Workshop tool. in 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2009. Paris, France: ACM.
21. Hundhausen, C., A. Agrawal, and K. Ryan. The design of an online environment to support pedagogical code reviews. in 41st SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2010. Milwaukee, WI, USA: ACM.
22. Gotel, O., C. Scharff, and Wildenberg. Teaching software quality assurance by encouraging student contributions to an open source web-based system for the assessment of programming assignments. in 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2008. Madrid, Spain: ACM.
23. Lutteroth, C. and A. Luxton-Reilly. Flexible Learning in CS2: A Case Study. in 21st Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (NACCQ 2008). 2008. Auckland, New Zealand.
24. Luxton-Reilly, A. and P. Denny, Constructive evaluation: A pedagogy of student-contributed assessment. Computer Science Education, 2010. 20(2): p. 145-167.
25. Purchase, H., et al. The quality of a PeerWise MCQ repository. in 12th Australasian Computing Education conference. 2010. Brisbane, Australia.
26. Gehringer, E.F., L.M. Ehresman, and D.J. Skrien, Expertiza: Students Helping to Write an OOD Text, in OOPSLA 2006. 2006: Portland, OR, USA.
27. Gehringer, E.F. and C.S. Miller. Student-generated active-learning exercises. in 40th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2009. Chattanooga, TN, USA: ACM.
28. Coelho, W. and G. Murphy, ClassCompass: A software design mentoring system. ACM Journal Educational Resoures in Computing, 2007. 7(1).
29. Cutts, Q., Essay writing with peer reviewing and marking, in REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility. 2007.
30. Choy, S.O. and K.C. Ng, Implementing wiki software for supplementing online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2007. 23(2): p. 209-226.
31. Anderson, N. and C.-C. Lin. Exploring technologies for building collaborative learning communities among diverse student populations. in 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2009. Paris, France: ACM.
32. Guerreiro, P. and K. Georgouli. Combating anonymousness in populous CS1 and CS2 courses. in 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2006. Bologna, Italy: ACM.
33. Bower, M. Groupwork activities in synchronous online classroom spaces. in 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2007. Covington, KY, USA: ACM.
34. Bower, M. Virtual classroom pedagogy. in 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2006. Houston, TX, USA: ACM.
35. Carrington, D., S.-K. Kim, and P. Strooper. An experience report on using collaboration technologies for distance and on-campus learning. in 12th Australasian Computing Education conference. 2010. Brisbane, Australia.
36. Pargas, R.P. Reducing lecture and increasing student activity in large computer science courses. in 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2006. Bologna, Italy: ACM.
37. Pargas, R.P. and D.M. Shah. Things are clicking in computer science courses. in 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2006. Houston, TX, USA: ACM.
38. Draper, S., J. Cargill, and Q. respond, Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2002. 18(1): p. 13-23.
39. Anderson, R., et al. Supporting active learning and example based instruction with classroom technology. in 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2007. Covington, KY, USA: ACM.
40. Koile, K. and D. Singer. Improving learning in CS1 via tablet-PC-based in-class assessment. in 2nd International Computing Education Research workshop. 2006. Canterbury, UK: ACM.
41. Razmov, V. and R. Anderson. Pedagogical techniques supported by the use of student devices in teaching software engineering. in 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2006. Houston, TX, USA: ACM.
42. Simon, B., et al. Noteblogging: taking note taking public. in 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2008. Portland, OR, USA: ACM.
43. Saeed, N. and Y. Yang. Incorporating blogs, social bookmarks, and podcasts into unit teaching. in 10th Australasian Computing Education conference. 2008. Wollongong, Australia.
44. Rößling, G. and A. Kothe. Extending Moodle to better support computing education. in 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2009. Paris, France: ACM.
45. Pears, A. and L.-Å. Larzon. Student perceptions of reflections as an aid to learning. in 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2006). 2006. Koli National Park, Finland.
46. Crescenzi, P. and C. Nocentini. The design of an online environment to support pedagogical code reviews. in 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2006. Bologna, Italy: ACM.
47. Romeike, R. Applying creativity in CS high school education - criteria, teaching example and evaluation. in 7th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2007). 2008. Koli National Park, Finland.
48. Hamer, J. Some experiences with the "Contributing Student Approach". in 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2006. Bologna, Italy.
49. Shanmugasundaram, V., P. Juell, and C. Hill. Knowledge building using visualizations. in 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2006. Bologna, Italy: ACM.
50. Denning, T., et al. Multimodal communication in the classroom: What does it mean for us? in 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2006. Houston, TX, USA: ACM.
51. Griswold, W.G. and B. Simon. Ubiquitous presenter: Fast, scalablea ctive learning for the whole classroom. in 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2006. Bologna, Italy: ACM.
52. Abad, C.L. Learning through creating learning objects. in 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2008. Madrid, Spain: ACM.
53. Marshall, B.B., et al., Moving digital libraries into the student learning space: The GetSmart experience. ACM Journal Educational Resoures in Computing, 2006. 6(1).
54. McConnell, J., Active learning and its use in computer science. SIGCSE Bulletin, 1996. 28: p. 52-54.
55. Denny, P., J. Hamer, and H. Purchase. PeerWise: Students sharing their multiple choice questions. in 4th International Computing Education Research workshop. 2008. Sydney, Australia: ACM.
56. Denny, P., J.L.-R. Hamer, Andrew, and H. Purchase. PeerWise. in 8th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2008). 2008. Koli National Park, Finland.
57. Denny, P., B. Hanks, and B. Simon. PeerWise: Replication study of a student-collaborative self-testing web service in a U.S. setting. in 41st SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2010. Milwaukee, WI, USA: ACM.
58. Denny, P. and A. Luxton-Reilly. Quality of student contributed questions using PeerWise. in 11th Australasian Computing Education conference. 2009. Wellington, New Zealand.
59. Denny, P., A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. Student use of the PeerWise system. in 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2008. Madrid, Spain: ACM.
60. Denny, P., et al. Coverage of course topics in a student generated MCQ repository. in 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2009. Paris, France: ACM.