Expertiza: Students helping to write an OOD text

Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 901-906

  Gehringer, Edward F ^a   Ehresman, Luke M ^a   Skrien, Dale J ^b  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b Health Services and Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer review; Reusable learning objects

Indexed keywords

PEER REVIEW; REUSABLE LEARNING OBJECTS;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TEXTBOOKS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 34248344211     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1176617.1176742     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. [BW 98] Black, P., and Wiliam, D., "Assessment and classroom learning," Assessment in Education 5:1, pp. 7-74, 1998.
2. [Bowe 92] Bowen, L.F., "The Daedalus Integrated Writing Environment," Computers and Composition 10, November 1992, pp. 77-88.
3. [CF 00] Chapman, Orville L. and Fiore, Michael A., "Calibrated peer review," Journal of Interactive Instruction Development 12:3, Winter 2000, pp. 11-15.
4. [CW 02] Clayton, Michael and Watkins, Adam, "Assessment in the Digital Arts," Syllabus 15, April 2002, pp. 31-34.
5. [Crav94] Craven, J., "A newmodel for teaching literature classes," T.H.E. Journal 22, August 1994, p. 55-57.
6. [Gehr01] Gehringer, Edward F., "Peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses," Proceedings of SIGCSE 2001: Thirty-Second Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Charlotte, Feb. 22-25, 2001, pp. 139-143.
7. [JMJN 81] Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., Nelson, D., and Skon, L., "Effect of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis," Psychological Bulletin 89, pp. 47-62.
8. [JJ 89] Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T., Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MA: Interaction Book, 1989.
9. [OMR 00] Orsmond, Paul, Merry, Stephen, and Reiling, Kevin, "The user of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25:1, March 2000, pp. 23-38.
10. [PW 04] Plutsky, Susan, and Wilson, Barbara A., "A comparison of three methods of teaching and evaluating writing: A quasi-experimental study," Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 46:1, Winter 2004, pp. 50-61.
11. [PJ 01] Pollock, L. and Jochen, M. 2001. Making parallel programming accessible to inexperienced programmers through cooperative learning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Charlotte, North Carolina, United States). SIGCSE '01. ACM Press, New York, NY, 224-228. DOI= http://www.lib.ncsu.edu:2234/10.1145/ 364447.364589.
12. [Stef 94] Stefani, L. A. J., "Peer, self, and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities," Studies in Higher Education 19:1,1994, pp. 69-75.
13. [Ster 04] Sterngold, Arthur, "Confronting Plagiarism: How Conventional Teaching Invites Cyber-cheating," Change 36:3, May-June 2004, pp. 16-21.
14. [Swai 05] Swain, Harriet, "Nip double trouble in the bud," The Times Higher Education Supplement No. 1676, p. 58, January 28,2005
15. [VCBM 95] Van Lehn, K. A., Chi, M. T. H., Baggett, W., and Murray, R.C. (1995), Progress report: Towards a theory of learning during tutoring. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Reasearch and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.