Learning from and with peers: The different roles of student peer reviewing

Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 31-35

  Søndergaard, Harald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Code reviews; PRAZE; Staged assessment; Student peer reviewing

Indexed keywords

CODE REVIEW; CODE REVIEWS; COGNITIVE SKILL; HIGHER ORDER; LAY-OUT; LEARNING COMMUNITY; ON-LINE TOOLS; PEER ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INNOVATION; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 77049104067     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1562877.1562893     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. D. Boud and N. Falchikov, editors. Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. Routledge, 2007.
2. S. Brown and A. Glasner, editors. Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Open University Press, 1999.
3. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. Student use of the PeerWise system. In Proc. ITiCSE 2008: 13th SIGCSE Ann. Conf. Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 73-77, 2008. Proceedings published as SIGCSE Bull. 40(3).
4. N. Falchikov. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement. RoutledgeFalmer, 2005.
5. N. Falchikov. The place of peers in learning and assessment. In D. Boud and N. Falchikov, editors, Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. Routledge, 2007.
6. E. F. Gehringer. Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses. In Proc. 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symp. Computer Science Education, pages 139-143, Charlotte, NC, 2001. Proceedings published as SIGCSE Bull. 33(1).
7. G. Gibbs. Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown and A. Glasner, editors, Assessment Matters in Higher Education. Open University Press, 1999.
8. J. Hamer, K. T. K. Ma, and H. H. F. Kwong. A method of automatic grade callibration in peer assessment. In A. Young and D. Tolhurst, editors, Proc. ACE 2004, volume 42 of Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, pages 67-72, 2005. http://crpit.com/Vol42.html.
9. M. E. Huba and J. E. Freed. Learner-Centred Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
10. D. E. Millard, K. Fill, L. Gilbert, Y. Howard, P. Sinclair, D. Senbanjo, and G. Wills. Towards a canonical view of peer assessment. In Proc. 7th IEEE Int. Conf. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), pages 793-797. IEEE Comp. Soc., 2007.
11. M. Morrison. PRISM: A peer review management system for programming assignments. Issues in Information Systems, V(2):626-632, 2004.
12. R. Mulder and J. Pearce. PRAZE: Innovating teaching through peer review. In A. K. R. Atkinson, C. McBeath and C. Cheers, editors, Proc. ASCILITE 2007, pages 727-736, Singapore, 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ conferences/singapore07/procs/mulder.pdf.
13. P. Naur. Project Activity in Computer Science Education. Lezione "Leonardo Fibonacci" 1969. Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche, I. E. I., Pisa, Italy, 1970. 13 pages.
14. E. Silva and D. Moreira. WebCoM: A tool to use peer review to improve student interaction. ACM JERIC, 3(1), 2003. Article 3.
15. D. A. Trytten. A design for team peer code review. In Proc. 36th SIGCSE Technical Symp. Computer Science Education, pages 455-459, St. Louis, MO, 2005. Proceedings published as SIGCSE Bull. 37(1).