Participatory instructional redesign by students and teachers in secondary education: Effects on perceptions of instruction

Instructional Science

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 737-762

  Könings, Karen D ^a,b   Brand Gruwel, Saskia ^b   van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Instructional design; Participatory design; Student perspectives

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961168818     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-010-9152-3     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allen, J., Jimmieson, N. L., Bordia, P., & Irmer, B. E. (2007). Uncertainty during organizational change: Managing perceptions through communication. Journal of Change Management, 7, 187-210.
2. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
3. Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. H. (2001). Intervention mapping: Designing theory and evidence-based health promotion programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
4. Beishuizen, J. J., Hof, E., van Putten, C. M., Bouwmeester, S., & Asscher, J. J. (2001). Students' and teachers' cognitions about good teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 185-201.
5. Berns, T. (2004). Usability and user-centred design, a necessity for efficient e-learning! International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 12, 20-25.
6. Blanco, N., Soto, E., Gómez, I., Revilla, F., & Muñoz, I. (2002, September). Listening to students. Experience and perceptions of secondary school students in Andalucia. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
7. Burke, C. (2007). The view of the child: Releasing 'visual voices 'in the design of learning environments. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28, 359-372.
8. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-284.
9. Cabana, S. (1995). Participative design works, partially participative doesn't. Journal of Quality and Participation, 18, 10-20.
10. Clark, R. E. (2001). New directions: Cognitive and motivational research issues. In R. E. Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence (pp. 263-298). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
11. Cook-Sather, A. (2001). Unrolling roles in techno-pedagogy: Toward new forms of collaboration in traditional college settings. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 121-139.
12. Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students' perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31, 3-14.
13. Cook-Sather, A. (2003). Listening to students about learning differences. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(4), 22-26.
14. Dahl, K. L. (1995). Challenges in understanding the learner's perspective. Theory into Practice, 34, 124-130.
15. Damodaran, L. (1996). User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 363-377.
16. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (Eds.). (2003). Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
17. De Jong, R., & Westerhof, K. J. (2001). The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour. Learning Environments Research, 4, 51-85.
18. Den Brok, P., Bergen, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2003, April). Comparing students' and teachers' perceptions of instructional behavior in Dutch secondary education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
19. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865-877.
20. Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's mind. London, UK: Fontana.
21. Doppelt, Y. (2004). Impact of science-technology learning environment characteristics on learning outcomes: Pupils' perceptions and gender differences. Learning Environments Research, 7, 271-293.
22. Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Schulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 5, pp. 163-197). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
23. Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21, 1-25.
24. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., Mac Iver, D., & Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students' motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 553-574.
25. Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (1999). Metacognitive instructional knowledge: Cognitive mediation and instructional design. Journal of Structural Learning & Intelligent Systems, 13, 145-169.
26. Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169-194.
27. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 295-311.
29. Flutter, J. (2006). This place could help you learn: Student participation in creating better school environments. Educational Review, 58, 183-193.
30. Fraser, B. J. (1982). Differences between student and teacher perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 511-519.
31. Fraser, B. J., & O'Brien, P. (1985). Student and teacher perceptions of the environment of elementary school classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 567-580.
32. Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2007). Exploring the links between students' engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 17, 673-687.
33. Holt, C., Denny, G., Capps, M., & de Vore, J. B. (2005). Teachers' ability to perceive student learning preferences: "I'm sorry, but I don't teach like that." Teachers College Record. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www. tcrecord. org, ID number 11767.
34. Johannessen, T. A., Harkin, J., & Mikalsen, O. (2002). Constructs used by 17-19 year old students in Northern Europe when informally evaluating their teachers. European Educational Research Journal, 1, 538-549.
35. Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 167-185.
36. Kershner, R., & Pointon, P. (2000). Children's views of the primary classroom as an environment for working and learning. Research in Education, 64, 64-77.
37. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Elen, J. (2008a, June). Listening to student desires on instructional design: Do they know what they would like? Paper presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen, Eindhoven [Educational Research Days], The Netherlands, Manuscript submitted for publication.
38. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005a). Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 645-660.
39. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005b, August). The effects of learning-related student characteristics on their perceptions of a "powerful" learning environment. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
40. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010a). An approach to participatory instructional design in secondary education: an exploratory study. Educational Research., 52, 45-59.
41. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007a). Teachers' perspective on innovations: Implications for educational design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 985-997.
42. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Broers, N. (2008b). Does a new learning environment come up to students' expectations? A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 535-548.
43. Könings, K. D., Seidel, T., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010b, June). Students' and teachers' perceptions of an innovative learning environment: Do they see through the same glasses? Paper presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen [Educational Research Days], Twente, The Netherlands, Manuscript submitted for publication.
44. Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M. J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007b). Participatory design in secondary education: Its desirability and feasibility according to teachers and students. Educational Studies, 33, 445-465.
45. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). In search of students' voices. Theory into Practice, 34, 88-93.
46. Lohman, D. F. (1986). Prediciting mathemathantic effects in the teaching of higher order skills. Educational Psychologist, 21, 191-208.
47. MacBeath, J. (2006). Finding a voice, finding self. Educational Review, 58, 195-207.
48. Mankin, D., Cohen, S. G., & Bikson, T. K. (1997). Teams and technology: Tensions in participatory design. Organizational Dynamics, 26, 63-74.
49. Markopoulos, P., & Bekker, M. (2003). Interaction design and children. Interacting with Computers, 15, 141-149.
50. Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students' evaluation of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 7, pp. 143-233). New York: Agathon Press.
51. Meister, D., & Enderwick, T. P. (2002). Human factors in system design, development, and testing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing "student voice" in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651-688.
53. Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), New perspectives on human-computer interaction (pp. 31-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
55. Oldfather, P. (1995a). Learning from student voices. Theory into Practice, 34, 86-87.
56. Oldfather, P. (1995b). Songs "come back most to them": Students' experiences as researchers. Theory into Practice, 34, 131-137.
57. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York: Guilford Press.
58. Pambookian, H. S. (1976). Discrepancy between instructor and student evaluations of instruction: Effect on instructor. Instructional Science, 5, 63-75.
59. Picarelli, A., Slaats, M., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., & Vermunt, J. D. (2006). Leerstijl en leeromgeving in het Voortgezet Onderwijs: Nederland en Vlaanderen vergeleken [Learning style and learning environment in secondary education: The Netherlands and Flanders compared]. Pedagogische Studien, 83, 139-155.
60. Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quaterly, 42, 203-220.
61. Proctor, T., & Doukakis, I. (2003). Change management: The role of internal communication and employee development. Corporate Communications, 8, 268-277.
62. Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 443-471.
63. Seifert, T. L., & O'Keefe, B. A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 81-92.
64. Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijks, H. G. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12, 263-284.
65. Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.
66. Watkins, D. (2004). Teachers as scholars of their students' conceptions of learning: A Hong Kong investigation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 361-373.
67. Wierstra, R. F. A., Kanselaar, G., van der Linden, J. L., & Lodewijks, H. G. L. C. (1999). Learning environment perceptions of European university students. Learning Environments Research, 2, 79-98.
68. Winne, P. H., & Marx, R. W. (1982). Students' and teachers' views of thinking processes for classroom learning. The Elementary School Journal, 82, 493-518.