An approach to participatory instructional design in secondary education: An exploratory study

Educational Research

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 45-59

  Könings, Karen D ^a,b   Brand Gruwel, Saskia ^a   van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^a,b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Instructional design; Student engagement; Student participation; Student perspectives; Student teacher interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950871984     PISSN: 00131881     EISSN: 14695847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131881003588204     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bartholomew, L.K., G.S. Parcel, G. Kok, and N.H. Gottlieb. 2001. Intervention mapping: Designing theory and evidence-based health promotion programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
2. Berns, T. 2004. Usability and user-centred design, a necessity for efficient e-learning! International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management 12: 20-5.
3. Cabana, S. 1995. Participative design works, partially participative doesn't. Journal of Quality and Participation 18: 10-20.
4. Cook-Sather, A. 2001. Unrolling roles in techno-pedagogy: Toward new forms of collaboration in traditional college settings. Innovative Higher Education 26: 121-39.
5. Cook-Sather, A. 2002. Authorizing students' perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher 31: 3-14.
6. Cook-Sather, A. 2003. Listening to students about learning differences. Teaching Exceptional Children March/April: 22-6.
7. Dahl, K.L. 1995. Challenges in understanding the learner's perspective. Theory into Practice 34: 124-30.
8. Damodaran, L. 1996. User involvement in the systems design process - A practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology 15: 363-77.
9. De Jong, R., and K.J. Westerhof. 2001. The quality of student ratings of teacher behavior. Learning Environments Research 4: 51-85.
10. Donaldson, M. 1978. Children's mind. London: Fontana.
11. Doppelt, Y. 2004. Impact of science-technology learning environment characteristics on learning outcomes: Pupils' perceptions and gender differences. Learning Environments Research 7: 271-93.
12. Doyle, W. 1977. Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In Review of research in education, ed. L.S. Shulman, 163-97. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
13. Druin, A. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21: 1-25.
14. Eccles, J.S., A. Wigfield, C. Midgley, D. Reuman, D. Mac Iver, and H. Feldlaufer. 1993. Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students' motivation. The Elementary School Journal 93: 553-74.
15. Elen, J., and J. Lowyck. 1999. Metacognitive instructional knowledge: Cognitive mediation and instructional design. Journal of Structural Learning & Intelligent Systems 13: 145-69.
16. Entwistle, N., and H. Tait. 1990. Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education 19: 169-94.
17. Fraser, B.J. 1982. Differences between student and teacher perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 4: 511-9.
18. Fraser, B.J., and P. O'Brien. 1985. Student and teacher perceptions of the environment of elementary school classrooms. The Elementary School Journal 85: 567-80.
19. Holt, C.R., G.S. Denny, M. Capps, and J.B. de Vore. 2005. Teachers' ability to perceive student learning preferences: 'I'm sorry, but I don't teach like that.' Teachers College Record. Published: 25 February 2005. http://www.tcrecord.org/ ID Number: 11767.
20. Johnston, P.J., and J.G. Nicholls. 1995. Voices we want to hear and voices we don't. Theory into Practice 34: 94-100.
21. Kensing, F., and J. Blomberg. 1998. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7: 167-85.
22. Kershner, R., and P. Pointon. 2000. Children's views of the primary classroom as an environment for working and learning. Research in Education 64: 64-77.
23. Konings, K.D., S. Brand-Gruwel, and J.J.G. van Merrienboer. 2005. Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 645-60.
24. Konings, K.D., S. Brand-Gruwel, and J.J.G. van Merrienboer. 2007. Students' and teachers' perceptions of an innovative learning environment: Do they see through the same glasses? Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Konings, K.D., S. Brand-Gruwel, J.J.G. van Merrienboer, and N. Broers. 2008. Does a new learning environment come up to students' expectations? A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 100: 535-48.
26. Konings, K.D., M.J. van Zundert, S. Brand-Gruwel, and J.J.G. van Merrienboer. 2007. Participatory design in secondary education: Its desirability and feasibility according to teachers and students. Educational Studies 33: 445-65.
27. Lincoln, Y.S. 1995. In search of students' voices. Theory into Practice 34: 88-93.
28. Mankin, D., S.G. Cohen, and T.K. Bikson. 1997. Teams and technology: Tensions in participatory design. Organizational Dynamics 26: 63-74.
29. Marsh, H.W., and M.J. Dunkin. 1992. Students' evaluation of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. J.C. Smart, 143-233. New York: Agathon Press.
30. Meister, D., and T.P. Enderwick. 2002. Human factors in system design, development, and testing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Mitra, D.L. 2004. The significance of students: Can increasing 'student voice' in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record 106: 651-88.
32. Oldfather, P. 1995a. Learning from student voices. Theory into Practice 34: 86-7.
33. Oldfather, P. 1995b. Songs 'come back most to them': Students' experiences as researchers. Theory into Practice 34: 131-7.
34. Onderwijsinspectie [Dutch inspection of education]. 2009. Opbrengstenkaarten. http://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/.
35. Papatheodorou, T. 2002. How we like our school to be... Pupil's voices. European Educational Research Journal 1: 445-67.
36. Rudduck, J. 2006. Editorial. The past, the papers and the project. Educational Review 58: 131-43.
37. Rudduck, J., and D. McIntyre. 2007. Improving learning through consulting pupils. London: Routledge.
38. Seifert, T.L., and B.A. O'Keefe. 2001. The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 81-92.
39. Smyth, J., and L. Fasoli. 2007. Climbing over the rocks in the road to student engagement and learning in a challenging high school in Australia. Educational Research 49: 273-95.
40. Stevens, L., P. Beekers, M. Evers, M. Wentzel, and W. van Werkhoven. 2004. Zin in school [Lust for school]. Amersfoort: CPS.
41. Vermetten, Y.J., J.D. Vermunt, and H.G. Lodewijks. 2002. Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction 12: 263-84.
42. Watkins, D. 2004. Teachers as scholars of their students' conceptions of learning: A Hong Kong investigation. British Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 361-73.