Teachers' perspectives on innovations: Implications for educational design

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 985-997

  Könings, Karen D ^a   Brand Gruwel, Saskia ^a   van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cooperation between designers and teachers; Educational innovation; Secondary education; Teacher conception; Teacher perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447127036     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrami P.C., Poulsen C., and Chambers B. Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology 24 2 (2004) 201-216
2. Bodker S. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human-Computer Interaction 11 (1996) 215-236
3. Chinn C.A., and Brewer W.F. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research 63 1 (1993) 1-49
4. Damodaran L. User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology 15 6 (1996) 363-377
5. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance (1957), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
6. Jonassen D.H. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Educational Technology, Research & Development 39 3 (1991) 5-14
7. Kember D. A reconceptualisation of the research into research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7 3 (1997) 255-275
8. Kensing F., and Blomberg J. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7 (1998) 167-185
9. Kensing F., Simonsen J., and Bodker K. MUST: A method for participatory design. Human-Computer Interaction 13 (1998) 167-198
10. Könings K.D., Brand-Gruwel S., and van Merriënboer J.J.G. Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75 4 (2005) 645-660
11. Mankin D., Cohen S.G., and Bikson T.K. Teams and technology: Tensions in participatory design. Organizational Dynamics 26 1 (1997) 63-74
12. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap (n.d.) (2005). Dossier tweede fase [Dossier second phase]. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from 〈http://www.minocw.nl/tweedefase/factsheet.html〉.
13. Mumford E. The reality of participative systems design: Contributing to stability in a rocking boat. Information Systems Journal 7 (1997) 309-322
14. Picarelli A., Bouhuijs P.A.J., and Vermunt J.D. Leerstijl en leeromgeving in het Voortgezet Onderwijs: Nederland en Vlaanderen vergeleken [Learning style and learning environment in secondary education: The Netherlands and Flanders compared]. Pedagogische Studiën 83 2 (2006) 139-155
15. Ponte P., Ax J., Beijaard D., and Wubbels T. Teachers' development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2004) 571-588
16. Pratt D.D. Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quaterly 42 4 (1992) 203-220
17. Prosser M., and Trigwell K. Development of an approaches to teaching questionnaire. Research and Development in Higher Education 15 (1993) 468-473
18. Prosser M., and Trigwell K. Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67 (1997) 25-35
19. Pugh K.J., and Zhao Y. Stories of teacher alienation: A look at the unintended consequences of efforts to empower teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (2003) 187-201
20. Roelofs E.C., and Terwel J. Constructivism and authentic pedagogy: State of the art and recent developments in the Dutch national curriculum in secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 (1999) 201-227
21. Simplicio J.S.C. Today's teachers struggle to educate a generation of students unlike any that has ever been seen before. Journal of Instructional Psychology 31 1 (2004) 71-75
22. Staub F.C. Transforming educational theory into usable knowledge: A case of co-constructing tools for lesson design and reflection. In: Ralle B., and Eilks I. (Eds). Quality in practice-oriented research in science education (2004), Shaker, Aachen, Germany 41-52
23. Stuurgroep Profiel Tweede Fase Voortgezet Onderwijs (1995). Verschil moet er zijn [There should be a difference]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Stuurgroep Profiel Tweede Fase Voortgezet Onderwijs.
24. Tigchelaar A., and Korthagen F. Deepening the exchange of student teaching experiences: Implications for the pedagogy of teacher education of recent insights into teacher behaviour. Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2004) 665-679
25. Trigwell K., Prosser M., and Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education 37 (1999) 57-70
26. Van Eekelen, I. M. (2005). Teachers' will and way to learn: Studies on how teachers learn and their willingness to do so. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
27. Verloop, N., & Lowyck, J. (Eds.). (2003). Onderwijskunde: een kennisbasis voor professionals [Educational theory: A knowledge base for professionals]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
28. Veugelers W., de Jong U., and Schellings G. Studie naar het onderzoek van de tweede fase havo/vwo [Metastudy of research of the second phase in senior general secondary education/pre-university education] (2004), Instituut voor de Lerarenopleiding, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
29. West L., and Staub F.C. Content-focused coaching (2003), Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH
30. Wierstra R.F.A., Kanselaar G., Van der linden J.L., and Lodewijks H.G.L.C. Learning environment perceptions of European university students. Learning Environments Research 2 (1999) 79-98