Testing Probability Matching and Episodic Retrieval Accounts of Response Repetition Effects in Task Switching

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 935-951

  Altmann, Erik M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Episodic retrieval; Repetition effects; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; RECALL; STUDENT; TIME; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFACTS; ATTENTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; TIME FACTORS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 79960287865     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022931     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Altmann E.M. Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done?. Psychological Science 2004, 15:616-622. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x.
2. Altmann E.M. Task switching is not cue switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:1016-1022.
3. Altmann E.M. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: Evidence from backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:892-899. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.892.
4. Altmann E.M., Gray W.D. An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review 2008, 115:602-639. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.602.
5. Altmann E.M., John B.E. Episodic indexing: A model of memory for attention events. Cognitive Science 1999, 23:117-156. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2302_1.
6. Arrington C.M., Logan G.D. Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:965-978. doi: 10.3758/BF03196874.
7. Baddeley A.D., Emslie H., Kolodny J., Duncan J. Random generation and the executive control of working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1998, 51:819-852. doi: 10.1080/027249898391413.
8. Bertelson P. Serial choice reaction time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature 1965, April 10, 206:217-218.
9. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624.
10. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., Braver T.S. A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 55:37-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005.
11. Campbell K.C., Proctor R.W. Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1993, 19:1345-1362. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1345.
12. Cooper S., Mari-Beffa P. The role of response repetition in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1198-1211. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1198.
13. Druey M.D., Hübner R. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: Evidence from repetition effects under task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1573-1600. doi: 10.1080/17470210701643397.
14. Druey M.D., Hübner R. Response inhibition under task switching: Its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation. Psychological Research 2008, 72:515-527. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0127-1.
15. Fagot, C. (1994). Chronometric investigations of task switching. (Unpublished dissertation). University of California, San Diego, CA.
16. Gade M., Koch I. Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: Evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 62:51-55. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.51.
17. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes 2000, 331-355. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
18. Hollands J.G., Jarmasz J. Revisiting confidence intervals for repeated measures designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:135-138. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.135.
19. Hommel B. Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007.
20. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-878. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103.
21. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2004, 68:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y.
22. Horoufchin H., Philipp A.M., Koch I. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: Task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:455-472. doi: 10.1037/a0020557.
23. Hübner R., Druey M.D. Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?. Psychological Research 2006, 70:245-261. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8.
24. Hübner R., Druey M.D. Multiple response codes play specific roles in response selection and inhibition under task switching. Psychological Research 2008, 72:415-424. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0118-2.
25. Juvina I., Taatgen N.A. A repetition-suppression account of between-trial effects in a modified Stroop paradigm. Acta Psychologica 2009, 131:72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.002.
26. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., Koch I. Control and interference in task switching: A review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:849-874. doi: 10.1037/a0019842.
27. Kiesel A., Wendt M., Peters A. Task switching: On the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research 2007, 71:117-125. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0004-8.
28. Kleinsorge T. Response repetition benefits and costs. Acta Psychologica 1999, 103:295-310. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00047-5.
29. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H. Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research 1999, 62:300-312. doi: 10.1007/s004260050060.
30. Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., Philipp A.M. The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:1-14. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1.
31. Koch, I., Lawo, V., Fels, J., & Vorlander, M. (in press). Switching in the cocktail party: Exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
32. Koch I., Schuch S., Vu K.-P.L., Proctor R.W. Response-repetition effects in task switching: Dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability. Acta Psychologica 2011, 136:399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.006.
33. Lien M.-C., Schweickert R., Proctor R.W. Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:692-712. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.692.
34. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:476-490.
35. Logan G.D., Bundesen C. Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:575-599. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575.
36. Mayr U. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: Tasks or cues?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:794-799. doi: 10.3758/BF03193999.
37. Mayr U., Bryck R.L. Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:337-350. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.337.
38. Mayr U., Keele S.W. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:4-26. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4.
39. Mayr U., Kliegl R. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:362-372. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362.
40. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1423-1442. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423.
41. Meiran N. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research 2000, 63:234-249. doi: 10.1007/s004269900004.
42. Meiran N. Task rule-congruency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 2005, 58:1023-1041.
43. Meiran N., Chorev Z., Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:211-253. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0736.
44. Meiran N., Hsieh S., Dimov E. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:992-1002. doi: 10.1037/a0019761.
45. Meiran N., Kessler Y. The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:137-157. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.137.
46. Meiran N., Kessler Y., Adi-Japha E. Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research 2008, 72:473-500. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0136-8.
47. Monsell S., Mizon G.A. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an "endogenous" task-set reconfiguration process?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:493-516. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493.
48. Neill W.T. Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:1291-1305. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1291.
49. Notebaert W., Soetens E. The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychologica 2003, 112:143-156. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00080-X.
50. Pashler H., Baylis G.C. Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991, 17:33-48. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.33.
51. Poljac E., de Haan A., van Galen G.P. Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:260-267. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.260.
52. Quinlan P.T. Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:297-303.
53. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207.
54. Ruthruff E., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:1404-1419. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1404.
55. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:343-367. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343.
56. Schuch S., Koch I. The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:566-582. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.566.
57. Smith M.C. Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 77:435-439. doi: 10.1037/h0021293.
58. Steinhauser M., Hübner R. Response-based strengthening in task shifting: Evidence from shift effects produced by errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:517-534. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.517.
59. Steinhauser M., Hübner R., Druey M. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1826-1835. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.022.
60. Trafton J.G., Altmann E.M., Ratwani R. A memory for goals model of sequence errors. Cognitive Systems Research 2011, 12:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.07.010.
61. Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F. Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:601-626. doi: 10.1037/a0019791.
62. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:361-413. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0.
63. Watter S., Logan G.D. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:254-277. doi: 10.3758/BF03193674.
64. Wendt M., Kluwe R.H., Peters A. Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:644-667. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644.
65. Yehene E., Meiran N. Is there a general task switching ability?. Acta Psychologica 2007, 126:169-195. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.007.