Parallel response selection in dual-task situations

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 254-277

  Watter, Scott ^a   Logan, Gordon D ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LOGIC; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LOGIC; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EID: 33745794317     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193674     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ALLPORT, D. A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. ASHBY, F. G. (1982). Deriving exact predictions from the cascade model. Psychological Review, 89, 599-607.
3. BUNDESEN, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
4. CARRIER, M. L., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.
5. COLES, M. G. H., GRATTON, G., BASHORE, T. R., ERIKSEN, C. W., & DONCHIN, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 529-553.
6. CRAFT, J. L., & SIMON, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415-420.
7. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
8. HIRST, W., & KALMAR, D. (1987). Characterizing artentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 68-81.
9. HOMMEL, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
10. HOMMEL, B., MÜSSELER, J., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
11. LIEN, M.-C., & PROCTOR, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1260-1280.
12. LIEN, M.-C., & PROCTOR, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212-238.
13. LOGAN, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.
14. LOGAN, G. D., & DELHEIMER, J. A. (2001). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 668-685.
15. LOGAN, G. D., & GORDON, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
16. LOGAN, G. D., & SCHULKIND, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
17. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 174-207.
18. MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
19. MEIRAN, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
20. MEYER, D. E., & KIERAS, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
21. MEYER, D. E., & KIERAS, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
22. NAVON, D., & MILLER, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 438-448.
23. NAVON, D., & MILLER, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251.
24. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & PALMERI, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
25. PASHLER, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 358-377.
26. PASHLER, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
27. PASHLER, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 277-309). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. PASHLER, H., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
29. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
30. SCHWEICKERT, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factors method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105-139.
31. SCHWEICKERT, R., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1989). A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 328-347.
32. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33. STOET, G., & HOMMEL, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
34. SUDEVAN, P., & TAYLOR, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 89-103.
35. TELFORD, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-36.
36. TOMBU, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 3-18.
37. TOWNSEND, J. T., & SCHWEICKERT, R. (1989). Toward the trichotomy method of reaction times: Laying the foundation of stochastic mental networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 309-327.
38. WYLIE, G., & ALLPORT, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs." Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.