Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?

Psychological Research

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 245-261

  Hübner, Ronald ^a   Druey, Michel D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION, RESPONSE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); JUDGMENT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33745650245     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bertelson, P. (1963). S-R relationships and RT to new vs. repeated signals in a send task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 478-484.
2. Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217-218.
3. Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., & Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39, 713-726.
4. Campbell, K. C., & Proctor, R. W. (1993). Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1345-1362.
5. Duncan, J. (1979). Divided attention: The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 216-228.
6. Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
7. Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
8. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
9. Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 640-653.
10. Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Response repetition benefits and costs. Acta Psychologica, 103, 295-310.
11. Kleinsorge, T., & Gajewski, P. D. (2004). Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 302-306.
12. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
13. Lien, M. C., Schweickert, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 692-712.
14. Logan, G. D. (1985). On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions. II. Stop-signal studies of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 675-691.
15. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 188-239). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.
17. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations. I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
18. Meiran, N. (2000a). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
19. Meiran, N. (2000b). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 377-399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Meiran, N. (2005). Task rule congmency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 A, 1023-1041.
21. Meiran, N., & Gotler, A. (2001). Modelling cognitive control in task switching and ageing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 165-186.
22. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
23. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning. II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
24. Peeke, S. C., & Stone, G. C. (1972). Sequential effects in two- and four-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 111-116.
25. Quinlan, P. T. (1999). Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 297-303.
26. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Repetition effects and signal classification strategies in serial choice-response tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20 A, 232-240.
27. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
28. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
29. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566-582.
30. Smith, M. C. (1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 435-439.
31. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic S-R bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
32. Welford, A. T. (1952). The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high-speed performance - a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.