A repetition-suppression account of between-trial effects in a modified Stroop paradigm

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 72-84

  Juvina, Ion ^a   Taatgen, Niels A ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive inhibition; Cognitive modeling; Negative priming; Sequence effects; Stroop

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS; STROOP TEST; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64749098141     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Altmann, E. M., & Davidson, D. J. (2001). An integrative approach to Stroop: Combining a language model and a unified cognitive theory. Paper presented at the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society. Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Anderson J.R. How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? (2007), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
3. Aron A.R. The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 13 3 (2007) 214-228
4. Baddeley A.D., Emslie H., Kolodny J., and Duncan J. Random generation and the executive control of working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 51 4 (1998) 819-852
5. Cattell J.M. The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind 11 (1886) 63-65
6. Christie J., and Klein R.M. Negative priming for spatial location?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 1 (2001) 24-38
7. Christie J.J., and Klein R.M. On finding negative priming from distractors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15 4 (2008) 866-873
8. Cohen J.D., Dunbar K., and McClelland J.L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 332-361
9. Druey M.D., and Hubner R. Response inhibition under task switching: Its strength depends on the amount of task irrelevant response activation. Psychological Research 72 (2008) 515-527
10. Effler M. The influence of serial factors on the Stroop test. Psychologische Beitrage 19 (1977) 189-200
11. Effler M. Processes in naming Stroop-stimuli: An analysis with word repetition effects. Archiv fur Psychologie 133 (1980) 249-262
12. Egner T., and Hirsch J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1784-1790
13. Fraisse P. Why is naming longer than reading?. Acta Psychologica 30 (1969) 96-103
14. Friedman N.P., and Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 1 (2004) 101-135
15. Fuentes L.J. Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 52 1 (1999) 149-164
16. Fuentes L.J., Boucart M., Vivas A.B., Alvarez R., and Zimmerman M.A. Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return is affected in schizophrenia: Evidence from the Stroop task. Neuropsychology 14 1 (2000) 134-140
17. Fuentes L.J., Vivas A.B., and Humphreys G.W. Inhibitory mechanisms of attentional networks: Spatial and semantic inhibitory processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1114-1126
18. Garson, G. D. (n.d.). Linear mixed models. In Statnotes: Topics in multivariate analysis. http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/statnote.htm Retrieved 05.21.2008.
19. Hasher L., Lustig C., and Zacks R.T. Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In: Conway A., Jarrold C., Kane M., Miyake A., Towse A., and Towse J. (Eds). Variation in working memory (2007), Oxford University Press, New York, NY 227-249
20. Herd S.A., Banich M.T., and O'Reilly R.C. Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: An integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 1 (2006) 22-32
21. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., and Vu K.P.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 68 (2004) 1-17
22. Houghton G., and Tipper S.P. Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: Applications to selective attention and sequential action. Brain and Cognition 30 (1996) 20-43
23. Houghton G., Tipper S.P., Weaver B., and Shore D.I. Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition 3 (1996) 119-164
24. Hubner R., and Druey M.D. Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?. Psychological Research 70 (2006) 245-261
25. Jonides J., and Smith E.E. The architecture of working memory. In: Rugg M.D. (Ed). Cognitive neuroscience (1997), Psychology Press, Sussex, England 243-276
26. Klein R.M. Orienting and inhibition of return. In: Gazzaniga M.S. (Ed). The cognitive neurosciences III (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 545-559
27. Kornblum S. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research 56 3 (1994) 130-135
28. Law M.B., Pratt J., and Abrams R.A. Color-based inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics 57 3 (1995) 402-408
29. Logan G.D. Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms?. Cognitive Psychology 22 (1990) 1-35
30. Logan G.D. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. (Eds). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 189-239
31. Lovett M.C. A strategy-based interpretation of Stroop. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 493-524
32. Lowe D.G. Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition. Memory and Cognition 7 5 (1979) 382-389
33. Lowe D.G. Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention. Memory and Cognition 13 1 (1985) 74-80
34. Maas C.J.M., and Hox J.J. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology 1 3 (2005) 86-92
35. MacDonald P.A., and Joordens S. Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: support for selection-feature mismatch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 4 (2000) 1478-1496
36. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 109 2 (1991) 163-203
37. MacLeod C.M. Cognitive inhibition: Elusive or illusion?. In: Roediger I.H.L., Dudai Y., and Fitzpatrick S.M. (Eds). Science of memory: Concepts (2007), Oxford University Press, New York, NY 301-305
38. MacLeod C.M. The concept of inhibition in cognition. In: Gorfein D.S., and MacLeod C.M. (Eds). Inhibition in cognition (2007), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 3-23
39. MacLeod C.M., and Bors D.A. Presenting two color words on a single Stroop trial: Evidence for joint influence, not capture. Memory and Cognition 30 5 (2002) 789-797
40. MacLeod C.M., and MacDonald P.A. Inter-dimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 383-391
41. MacLeod C.M., Dodd M.D., Sheard E.D., Wilson D.E., and Bibi U. In opposition to inhibition. In: Ross H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 43 (2003), Elsevier Science 163-214
42. Meehl P.E. Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry 1 2 (1990) 108-141
43. Milliken B., and Joordens S. Negative priming without overt prime selection. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 4 (1996) 333-346
44. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., and Wager T.D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 41 (2000) 49-100
45. Neill W.T. Decision processes in selective attention: Response priming in the Stroop color-word task. Perception and Psychophysics 23 (1978) 80-84
46. Neill W.T. Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory and Cognition 23 6 (1997) 1291-1305
47. Neill W.T., and Westberry R.L. Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13 (1987) 327-334
48. Park J., and Kanwisher N. Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 613-623
49. Posner M.I., and Cohen Y. Components of visual attention. In: Bouma H., and Bouwhuis D.G. (Eds). Attention and performance Vol. 10 (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 531-556
50. Pratt J., Hillis J., and Gold J.M. The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8 3 (2001) 489-495
51. Pratt J., Spalek T.M., and Bradshaw F. The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 730-746
52. Pylyshyn Z.W. Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 5 (2000) 197-207
53. Roelofs A.P.A. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 88-124
54. Rothermund K., Wentura D., and De Houwer J. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 31 (2005) 482-495
55. Shallice T. The fractionation of supervisory control. In: Gazzaniga M.S. (Ed). The cognitive neurosciences III (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 943-956
56. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A (1985) 571-590
57. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 54A (2001) 321-343
58. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Jerreat L.M., and Burak A.L. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 3 (1994) 478-499
59. Van Maanen L., and Van Rijn H. An accumulator model of semantic interference. Cognitive Systems Research 8 3 (2007) 174-181
60. Vivas A.B., and Fuentes L.J. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8 2 (2001) 315-323
61. Weger U.W., and Inhoff A.W. Semantic inhibition of return is the exception rather than the rule. Perception and Psychophysics 68 (2006) 244-253