Resolving Task Rule Incongruence During Task Switching by Competitor Rule Suppression

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 992-1002

  Meiran, Nachshon ^a   Hsieh, Shulan ^b   Dimov, Eduard ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Conflict monitoring; Congruency; Inhibition; Response repetition; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77954155768     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019761     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ach, N. (2006). On volition (T. Herz, Trans.). (Original work published 1910) Retrieved from http://www.psychologie.uni-konstanz.de/abteilungen/kognitive-psychologie/various/narziss-ach/.
2. Allport A., Styles E.A., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and unconscious processing 1994, 421-452. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Umiltà, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
3. Allport A., Wylie G. Task-switching, stimulus-response binding, and negative priming. Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes 2000, 35-70. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
4. Anderson M.C., Spellman B.A. On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review 1995, 102:68-100.
5. Arbuthnott K.D., Frank J. Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 54:33-41.
6. Arrington C.M., Altmann E.M., Carr T.H. Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:781-789.
7. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Carter C.S., Barch D.M., Cohen J.D. Evaluating the demand for control: Anterior cingulate cortex and crosstalk monitoring. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
8. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., Braver T.S. A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task switching. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 55:37-85.
9. Campbell K.C., Proctor R.W. Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:1345-1362.
10. Druey M., Hübner R. The role of temporal cue-target overlap in backward inhibition under task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:749-754.
11. Druey M., Hübner R. Response inhibition under task switching: Its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation. Psychological Research 2008, 72:515-527.
12. Friedman N., Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:101-135.
13. Gade M., Koch I. The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:603-609.
14. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes 2000, 331-355. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
15. Grange J.A., Houghton G. Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:2068-2079.
16. Hübner M., Dreisbach G., Haider H., Kluwe R.H. Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:289-297.
17. Hübner R., Futterer T., Steinhauser M. On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:640-653.
18. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H. Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research 1999, 62:300-312.
19. Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., Philipp A.M. The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:1-14.
20. Logan G.D. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users guide to the stop signal paradigm. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language 1994, 189-239. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. D. Dagenbach, T.H. Carr (Eds.).
21. Logan G.D., Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 2001, 108:393-434.
22. Masson M.E.J., Bub D.N., Ishigami Y. Task set persistence modulates word reading following resolution of picture-word interference. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:2012-2018.
23. Masson M.E.J., Bub D.N., Woodward T.S., Chan J.C.K. Modulation of word-reading processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:400-418.
24. Mayr U. Inhibition of task sets. Inhibition in cognition 2007, 27-44. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. D. Gorfein, C.M. MacLeod (Eds.).
25. Mayr U., Keele S.W. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:4-26.
26. Meiran N., Daichman A. Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cueing task-switching paradigm. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:1272-1288.
27. Meiran N., Kessler Y. The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:137-157.
28. Meiran N., Kessler Y., Adi-Japha E. Control by Action Representation and Input Selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research 2008, 72:473-500.
29. Muraven M., Baumeister R.F. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:247-259.
30. Neill W.T., Terry K.M., Valdes L.A. Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:119-121.
31. Nigg J.T. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:200-246.
32. Oberauer K. Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:948-957.
33. Pashler H., Baylis G.C. Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991, 17:33-48.
34. Philipp A.M., Jolicœur P., Falkenstein M., Koch I. Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:1062-1075.
35. Philipp A.M., Koch I. Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2006, 18:624-639.
36. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231.
37. Rubinstein J.S., Meyer D.E., Evans J.E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:763-797.
38. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:343-367.
39. Schneider D.W., Verbruggen F. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1629-1640.
40. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-Prime (Version 1.0) [Computer software] 2002, Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA.
41. Schuch S., Koch I. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:92-105.
42. Schuch S., Koch I. The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:566-582.
43. Sdoia S., Ferlazzo F. Stimulus related inhibition of task set during task switching. Experimental Psychology 2008, 55:322-327.
44. Soetens E.L.L., Boer L.C., Heuting J.E. Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:598-616.
45. Sohn M.H., Anderson J.R. Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:764-778.
46. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica 1969, 30:276-315.
47. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
48. Sudevan P., Taylor D.A. The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance 1987, 13:89-103.
49. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1985, 37(A):571-590.
50. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2001, 54(A):321-343.
51. Trope Y., Fishbach A. Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79:493-506.
52. Wallhoff F. Facial expressions and emotion database [Database] 2006, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Retrieved from http://www.mmk.ei.tum.de/~waf/fgnet/feedtum.html.
53. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:361-413.