Response-based strengthening in task shifting: Evidence from shift effects produced by errors

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 517-534

  Steinhauser, Marco ^a   Hübner, Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Error processing; Response repetition; Task shifting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); JUDGMENT; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33746928723     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.517     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Altmann, E. M. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done? Psychological Science, 15, 616-622.
3. Altmann, E. M. (2005). Repetition priming in task switching: Do the benefits dissipate? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 535-540.
4. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
5. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
6. De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
8. Fairweather, H. (1978). Choice reaction Limes in children: Error and post-error responses, and the repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 407-418.
9. Fiehler, K., Ullsperger, M., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of error correction. Psychophysiology, 42, 72-82.
10. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
11. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Hoffmann, J., Kiesel, A., & Sebald, A. (2003). Task switches under Go/NoGo conditions and the decomposition of switch costs. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 101-128.
13. Hübner, R., & Druey, M. (in press). Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting? Psychological Research.
14. Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 640-653.
15. Hübner, M., Kluwe, R. H., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Peters. A. (2004). Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: No evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1043-1063.
16. Kleinsorge, T., & Gajewski, P. D. (2004). Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 302-306.
17. Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 488-492.
18. Laming, D. (1979a). Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. Acta Psychologica, 43, 381-412.
19. Laming, D. (1979b). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologics, 43, 199-224.
20. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
21. Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96-109.
22. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
23. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
24. McClelland, J. L. (2001). Failures to learn and their remediation: A Hebbian account. In J. L. McClelland & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives (pp. 97-121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Megaw, F., D. (1972). Directional errors and their correction in a discrete tracking task. Ergonomics, 15, 633-643.
26. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
27. Meiran, N. (2000a). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
28. Meiran, N. (2000b). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377-400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
30. Meiran, N., & Gotler, A. (2001). Modelling cognitive control in task switching and ageing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 165-186.
31. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327-342.
32. Pashler, H., Zarow, G., & Triplett, B. (2003). Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1051-1057.
33. Rabbitt, P. (1967). Time to detect errors as a function of factors affecting choice-response time. Acta Psychalogica, 27, 131-142.
34. Rabbitt, P. (1968). Three kinds of error-signalling responses in a serial choice task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 179-188.
35. Rabbitt, P. (1990). Age, IQ and awareness, and recall of errors. Ergonomics, 33, 1291-1305.
36. Rabbitt, P. (2002). Consciousness is slower than you think. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 1081-1092.
37. Rabbitt, P., & Rodgers, D. (1977). What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 727-743.
38. Rabbitt, P., & Vyas, S. (1981). Processing a display even after you make a response to it: How perceptual errors can be corrected. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 223-239.
39. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung, 66, 312-323.
40. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
41. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1404-1419.
42. Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. (2000). Performance monitoring in a confusing world: Error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 141-151.
43. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367.
44. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
45. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566-582.
46. Smith, M. C. (1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 435-439.
47. Sohn, M.-H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764-778.
48. Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (in press-a). Automatic activation of taskrelated representations in task-shifting. Memory & Cognition.
49. Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (in press-b). Mixing costs in task-shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multi-component task. Memory & Cognition.
50. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
51. Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
52. Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs."Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.
53. Yeung, N., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 939-959.