Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: Evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 51-55

  Gade, Miriam ^a,c   Koch, Iring ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c SISSA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Cue based processes; Inhibition; Task sequence performance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE;

ADULT; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE;

EID: 46049105172     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.51     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Selection-for-action in competing (Stroop) tasks: 'Task-switching," stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Arbuthnott, K. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1030-1042.
3. Forstmann, B. U., Brass, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychological Research, 71, 393-400.
4. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2005). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 530-534.
5. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007a). Cue-task associations in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 762-769.
6. Gade, M,. & Koch, I. (2007b). The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 603-609
7. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 333-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task cuing procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
9. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
10. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
11. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task selection cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
12. Meiran, N. (2000). Modelling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
13. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
14. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
15. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modelling task switching without switching a task: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367.
16. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.