Shape control of a hyper-redundant arm for planar object manipulation

Advanced Robotics

Volumn 25, Issue 9-10, 2011, Pages 1159-1181

  Jareanpon, Chatklaw ^a   Maneewongvatana, Songrit ^a   Maneewarn, Thavida ^a  

^a KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

Author keywords

B zier curve; Hyper redundant robot; non prehensile grasp; shape control; virtual constraint

Indexed keywords

A-PLANE; CIRCULAR SHAPE; GRADIENT DESCENT METHOD; HYPER REDUNDANT; HYPER-REDUNDANT ROBOT; JOINT ANGLE; NON-PREHENSILE GRASP; OBJECT MANIPULATION; SHAPE CONTROL; TARGET POSITION; VIRTUAL CONSTRAINTS; WHOLE ARM MANIPULATION;

EID: 79959563814     PISSN: 01691864     EISSN: 15685535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/016918611X574669     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. R. Burridge, A. Rizzit and D. Koditschek, Toward a dynamical pick and place, in: Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 292-297 (1995).
2. S. Yahya, H. Mohamed, M. Moghavvemi and S. Yang, Member, a new geometrical inverse kinematics method for planar hyper redundant manipulators, in: Proc. Conf. on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 20-22 (2009).
3. F. Fahimi, H. Ashrafiuon and C. Nataraj, An improved inverse kinematic and velocity solution for spatial hyper-redundant robots, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 18, 103-107 (2002). (Pubitemid 34414691)
4. W. Chung, Y. Youm and W. Chung, Inverse kinematics of planar redundant manipulators via virtual links with configuration index, J. Robotic Syst. 11, 117-128 (2007).
5. S. Ma, M. Watanabe and H. Kondo, Dynamic control of curve-constrained hyper-redundant manipulators, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, Alberta, pp. 83-88 (2001).
6. G. Pereira, V. Kumar, J. Spletzer, C. Taylor and M. Campos, Cooperative transport of planar objects robots using object closure, Springer Tracts Adv. Robotics 5, 287-296 (2003).
7. S. Chirikjian and J. Burdick, The kinematics of hyper-redundant robot locomotion, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 11, 782-793 (1995).
8. K. Mathia and R. Saeks, Inverse kinematics via linear dynamic networks, in: Proc. World Congr. on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, pp. II47-II52 (1994).
9. A. Ata and T. Myo, Optimal point-to-point trajectory tracking of redundant manipulator using generalized pattern search, Int. J. Adv. Robotics Syst. 2, 239-244 (2005). (Pubitemid 41426447)
10. A. Guez and Z. Ahmad, Solution to the Inverse kinematics problem in robotics by neural network, in: Proc. Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, Skövde, pp. II617-II624 (1988).
11. Y. Li and S. Leong, Kinematics control of redundant manipulators using CMAC neural network combined with a genetic algorithm, Robotica 22, 611-621 (2004).
12. I. Chen, G. Yang and I. Kang, Numerical inverse kinematics for modular reconfigurable robots, J. Robotic Syst. 16, 213-225 (1999).
13. K. Salisbury, W. Townsend, B. Eberman and D. DiPietro, Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS), in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 254-260 (1988). (Pubitemid 18667094)
14. B. S. Eberman, Whole-arm manipulation: kinematics and control, Master's Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA (1989).
15. G. Chirikjian and J. Burdick, A modal approach to hyper-redundant manipulator kinematics, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 10, 343-354 (1994).
16. H. Mochiyama, E. Shimemura and H. Kobayashi, Shape control of manipulators with hyper degress of freedom, Int. J. Robotic Res. 18, 584-600 (1999).
17. S. Hirose and Y. Umetani, The Development of Soft Gripper for the Versatile Robot Hand: Mechanism and Machine Theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1978).
18. S. Hirose and Y. Umetani, The kinematics and control of a soft gripper for the handling of living or fragile objects, in: Proc. 5th IFToMM World Cong. on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Montreal, pp. 1175-1178 (1979).
19. S. Hirose, Biologically Inspired Robots: Snake-like Locomotors and Manipulators. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993).
20. E. Shimemura, H. Kobayashi and H. Mochiyama, Control of serial rigid link manipulators with hyper degees of freedom: shape control by a homogeneously decentralized scheme and its experiment, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Osaka, pp. 2877-2882 (1996).
21. P. H. Chang, A closed-form solution for inverse kinematics of robot manipulators with redundancy, IEEE J. Robotics Automat. 3, 393-403 (1987).
22. T. Komura, R. Lau and E. Ho, Computing inverse kinematics with linear programming, in: Proc. ACM Symp. on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, New York, NY, pp. 163-166 (2005).
23. T. Takahashi and A. Kawamura, High speed numerical calculation method for on-line inverse kinematics of robot manipulators, in: Proc. 25th Annu. Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, San Jose, CA, pp. 436-441 (1999). (Pubitemid 32132252)
24. S. R. Buss, Introduction to inverse kinematics with Jacobian transpose, pseudoinverse and damped least squares methods, 1-19 (2004).
25. J. Guo and V. Cherkassky, A solution to the inverse kinematic problem in robotics using neural network processing, in: Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, Washington, DC, pp. 299-304 (1989). (Pubitemid 20642102)
26. Y. Singh, R. Kumar and V. Banga, Simulation of Robotic Arm using Genetic Algorithm and AHP, in: Proc. Int. Conf. of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, Vienna, pp. 7-20 (2007).
27. J. Zhang, T. Roland, S. Manolidis and N. Simaan, Optimal path planning for robotic insertion of steerable electrode arrays in cochlear implant surgery, ASME J. Med. Dev. 3, 011001-1-10 (2009).
28. G. Oke and Y. Istefanopulos, Gradient-descent based trajectory planning for regulation of a twolink flexible robotic arm, in: Proc. IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Como, pp. 948-952 (2001). (Pubitemid 32797653)
29. T. Sugar and V. Kumar, Multiple cooperating mobile manipulators, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, pp. 1538-1543 (1999).
30. T. Maneewarn and P. Detudom, Mechanics of cooperative nonprehensile pulling by multiple robots, in: Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robot and Systems, Edmonton, pp. 1319-1324 (2005).
31. J. Kindermann and A. Linden, Inversion of neural networks by gradient descent, J. Parallel Comput. 4, 277-286 (1990).
32. C. Jareanpon, S. Maneewongvatana and T. Maneewarn, Manipulating object by hyper-redundant caging, in: Proc. Int. Symp. on Robotics and Intelligent Sensor, Nagoya, pp. TS3A1 1-4 (2010).
33. E. Ari, I. Erkmen and A. Erkmen, An FACL controller architecture for a grasping snake robot, in: Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, pp. 1748-1753 (2005).
34. Y. Zhao, T. Huang and Z. Yang, A new numerical algorithm for the inverse position analysis of all serial manipulators, Robotica 24, 1-4 (2005).
35. X. Zhao and S. Peng, A successive approximation algorithm for the inverse position analysis of serial manipulatos, Robotica 17, 487-489 (1999). (Pubitemid 30509158)
36. I. Chen, Theory and applications of modula reconfigurable robotic systems, PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology (1994).
37. M. Tabaczynski, Jacobain solutions to the inverse kinematics problem, Current 128, 1-29 (2006).
38. I. D. Walker, D. Dawson, T. Flash, F. Grasso, R. Hanlon, B. Hochner, W. M. Kier, C. Pagano, C. D. Rahn and Q. Zhang, Continuum robot arms inspired by cephalopods, in: Proc. SPIE Conf. on Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology IV, Orlando, FL, pp. 303-314 (2005). (Pubitemid 41537909)
39. B. Atakan, A. Erkmen and I. Erkmen, 3-D grasping during serpentine motion with a snake-like robot, in: Proc. IASTED Int. Conf. Robotics and Applications, Cambridge, pp. 46-51 (2005).