Realist Constructivism

Realist Constructivism

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-194

  Barkin, Samuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958267186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750410     Document Type: Book

References (269)

1. Adler, Emanuel 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 3: 319-363.
2. Adler, Emanuel and Michael Barnett (eds.) 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Althusser, Louis 1971. Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, trans. Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press.
4. Arendt, Hannah 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Arfi, Badredine 2005. “Resolving the Trust Predicament in IR: A Quantum Game-Theoretic Approach,” Theory and Decision 59: 127-174.
6. Aristotle, 1958. The Politics of Aristotle, ed. and trans. Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Ashley, Richard 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism,” International Organization 38: 225-286.
8. Ashley, Richard and R. B. J. Walker 1990. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 259-268.
9. Bachrach, Peter and Morton Baratz 1962. “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review 56: 947-952.
10. Baldwin, David 1979. “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies,” World Politics 31: 161-194.
11. Baldwin, David. 1989. Paradoxes of Power. New York: Blackwell.
12. Barkin, J. Samuel 1998. “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms,” Millennium 27: 229-252.
13. Barkin, J. Samuel. 2003a. “Realist Constructivism,” International Studies Review 5:3: 325-342.
14. Barkin, J. Samuel. 2003b. Social Construction and the Logic of Money: Financial Predominance and International Economic Leadership. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Barkin, J. Samuel. 2008. “Qualitative Methods?” In Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash (eds.), Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16. Barkin, J. Samuel and Bruce Cronin 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 107-130.
17. Barnett, Michael and Raymond Duvall 2005. “Power in International Politics,” International Organization 59: 39-75.
18. Bartelson, Jens 1998. “Second Natures: Is the State Identical With Itself?” European Journal of International Relations 4: 295-326.
19. Bernstein, Steven 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Biebricher, Thomas 2005. “Habermas, Foucault, and Nietzsche: A Double Misunderstanding,” Foucault Studies 3: 1-26.
21. Booth, Ken 1991. “Security and Emancipation,” Review of International Studies 17: 313-326.
22. Boucoyannis, Deborah 2007. “The International Wanderings of a Liberal Idea, or Why Liberals Can Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Balance of Power,” Perspectives on Politics 5: 703-728.
23. Bourdieu, Pierre 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Brams, Steven 1980. Biblical Games: A Strategic Analysis of Stories in the Old Testament. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Brown, Chris 1994. “Turtles All the Way Down: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory, and International Relations,” Millennium 23: 213-236.
26. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, 1985. “The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility Model,” American Political Science Review 79: 156-177.
28. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James Morrow, Randolph Siverson, and Alastair Smith 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace,” American Political Science Review 93: 791-807.
29. Bull, Hedley 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Burchill, Scott, Richard Devetak, Andrew Linklater, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit, and Jacqui True 2001. Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31. Burgerman, Susan 2001. Moral Victories: How Activists Provoke Multilateral Action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32. Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever, and Jaap de Wilde 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
33. Campbell, David 1998. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Carr, E. H. 1964. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Reprinted from the earlier edition. New York: Harper & Row.
35. Chan, Steve 1997. “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise,” Mearshon International Studies Review 41: 59-91.
36. Checkel, Jeffrey 2006. “Tracing Causal Mechanisms,” International Studies Review 8: 362-370.
37. Chernoff, Fred 2007. “Critical Realism, Scientific Realism, and International Relations Theory,” Millennium 35: 399-407.
38. Chwieroth, Jeffrey 2007. “Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas: The Case of Neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund,” International Studies Quarterly 51: 5-30.
39. Claude, Inis 1962. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.
40. Copeland, Dale 2000. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay,” International Security 25: 187-212.
41. Copeland, Dale. 2003. “A Realist Critique of the English School,” Review of International Studies 29: 427-441.
42. Copeland, Dale Copeland, Dale, 1986. “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” In Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
43. Copeland, Dale Copeland, Dale. 1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces and the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
44. Cronin, Bruce 1999. Community Under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
45. Dahl, Robert 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Der Derian, James, 1990. “The (S)pace of International Relations: Simulation, Surveillance, and Speed,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 295-310.
47. Dessler, David 1989. “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43: 441-473.
48. Deudney, Daniel 2006. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Deudney, Daniel and Richard Matthew (eds.) 1999. Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
50. Donnelly, Jack 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Doty, Roxanne Lynn 2000. “Desire All the Way Down,” Review of International Studies 26: 137-139.
52. Dueck, Colin 2006. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Dunn, Kevin 2006. “Examining Historical Representations,” International Studies Review 8: 370-381.
54. Dunne, Tim 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
55. Ellis, David 2005. “Defending the International Interest.” Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Doctoral Dissertation.
56. Ellis, David. 2009. “On the Possibility of ‘International Community’,” International Studies Review 11: 1-26.
57. Elster, Jon 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Fearon, James 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49: 379-414.
60. Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt 2002. “Rationalism versus Constructivism: A Skeptical View.” In Walter Carlesnaes, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.
61. Fierke, Karen and Knud Erik Jorgensen (eds.) 2001. Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
62. Finnemore, Martha 1996a. National Interest in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63. Finnemore, Martha. 1996b. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism,” International Organization 50: 325-347.
64. Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52: 887-917.
65. Flyvbjerg, Bent 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Freyberg-Inan, Annette 2004. What Moves Man: The Realist Theory of International Relations and its Judgment of Human Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.
67. Friedman, Jeffrey (ed.) 1995. The Rational Choice Controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68. George, Jim 1989. “International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space: Another View of the Third Debate,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 269-279.
69. George, Jim. 1994. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. New York: Macmillan.
70. George, Jim and David Campbell 1990. “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 269-293.
71. Geuss, Raymond 2002. “Liberalism and its Discontents,” Political Theory 30:320-338.
72. Giles, Michael and James Garand 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches,” PS: Political Science & Politics 40: 741-751.
73. Gill, Stephen (ed.) 1993. Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Gilpin, Robert 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Goddard, Stacie 2009. “When Right Makes Might: How Prussia Overturned the European Balance of Power,” International Security 33: 110-142.
76. Goddard, Stacie and Daniel Nexon 2005. “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 11: 9-61.
77. Goff, Patricia and Kevin Dunn (eds.) 2004. Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
78. Green, Donald and Ian Shapiro 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
79. Grieco, Joseph 1997. “Realist International Theory and the Study of World Politics.” In Michael Doyle and G. John Ikenberry (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
80. Gunnell, John 1993. The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81. Guzzini, Stefano 1993. “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis,” International Organization 47: 443-478.
82. Guzzini, Stefano. 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.
83. Guzzini, Stefano. 2000. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 147-182.
84. Guzzini, Stefano. 2005. “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium 33: 495-522.
85. Haas, Peter, Robert Keohane, and Marc Levy (eds.) 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. Habermas, Jurgen 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
87. Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Habermas, Jurgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90. Hall, Rodney Bruce 1997. “Moral Authority as a Power Resource,” International Organization 51: 555-589.
91. Helleiner, Eric 2003. The Making of National Money: Territorial Currencies in Historical Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
92. Hoffmann, Matthew 2005. Ozone Depletion and Climate Change: Constructing a Global Response. Albany: State University of New York Press.
93. Hoffmann, Matthew. 2009. “Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron?” International Studies Review 11: 231-252.
94. Holsti, Kalevi 1985. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
95. Hopf, Ted 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” International Security 23: 171-200.
96. Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
97. Houghton, David Patrick 2007. “Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach,” Foreign Policy Analysis 3: 24-45.
98. Hughes, Barry 2000. Continuity and Change in World Politics: Competing Perspectives, 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
99. Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Daniel Nexon 2004. “Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?” International Studies Review 6: 337-341.
100. Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Daniel Nexon. 2009. “Paradigmatic Faults in International Relations Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 53.
101. Jacobsen, John Kurt 2003. “Duelling Constructivisms: A Post-mortem on the Ideas Debate in Mainstream IR/IPE,” Review of International Studies 29: 39-60.
102. Jervis, Robert 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
103. Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30: 167-214.
104. Jervis, Robert. 1994. “Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics,” Social Research 61: 853-876.
105. Jervis, Robert. 1998. “Realism in the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52: 971-991.
106. Johnson Bagby, Laurie, 1994. “The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 131-153.
107. Kahler, Miles 1998. “Rationality in International Relations,” International Organization 52: 919-941.
108. Kant, Immanuel 1957. Perpetual Peace, ed. Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan.
109. Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane, and Stephen Krasner 1998. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52: 645-685.
110. Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
111. Kegley, Charles 1993. “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities,” International Studies Quarterly 37: 131-147.
112. Kegley, Charles and Eugene Wittkopf 2001. World Politics: Trends and Transformations, 8th edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press.
113. Keohane, Robert 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
114. Keohane, Robert. 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly 32: 379-396.
115. Keohane, Robert. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
116. Kier, Elizabeth and Jonathan Mercer 1996. “Setting Precedents in Anarchy: Military Intervention and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” International Security 20: 77-106.
117. King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
118. Kirk, Grayson 1947. The Study of International Relations in American Colleges and Universities. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
119. Klotz, Audie 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
120. Klotz, Audie. 2006. “Moving Beyond the Agent-Structure Debate,” International Studies Review 8: 355.
121. Klotz, Audie and Cecelia Lynch 2006. “Translating Terminologies,” International Studies Review 8: 356-362.
122. Klotz, Audie and Cecelia Lynch. 2007. Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
123. Klotz, Audie and Deepa Prakash (eds.) 2008. Qualitative Methods in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
124. Knorr, Klaus and James Rosenau (eds.) 1969. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
125. Krasner, Stephen 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics 28: 317-347.
126. Krasner, Stephen. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and US Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
127. Kratochwil, Friedrich 1984. “Errors Have Their Advantages,” International Organization 38: 305-320.
128. Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2000. “Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s Social Theory of International Politics and the Constructivist Challenge,” Millennium 29: 73-101.
129. Kratochwil, Friedrich and John Gerard Ruggie 1986. “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization 40: 753-775.
130. Krebs, Ronald and Patrick Thaddeus Jackson 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric,” European Journal of International Relations 13: 35-66.
131. Kubalkova, Vendulka 1998. “The Twenty Years’ Catharsis: E. H. Carr and IR.” In Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
132. Kubalkova, Vendulka, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert 1998 “Constructing Constructivism.” In Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
133. Kuhn, Thomas 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
134. Kuhn, Thomas. 1991. “The Natural and the Human Sciences.” In D. Hiley, J. Bohman, and R. Shusterman (eds.), The Interpretative Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
135. Kurki, Milja 2007. “Critical Realism and Causal Analysis in International Relations,” Millennium 35: 361-378.
136. Lang, Anthony 2002. Agency and Ethics: The Politics of Military Intervention. Albany: State University of New York Press.
137. Lapid, Yosef 1989. “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era,” International Studies Quarterly 33:235-254.
138. Lasswell, Harold 1935. World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
139. Lasswell, Harold and Abraham Kaplan 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
140. Lebow, Richard Ned 2001. “Thucydides the Constructivist,” American Political Science Review 95: 547-560.
141. Lebow, Richard Ned. 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
142. Legro, Jeffrey 1995. Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
143. Legro, Jeffrey and Andrew Moravcsik 1999. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24: 5-55.
144. Lenin, Vladimir Illyich 1969 [1917]. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. Moscow: International Publishers.
145. Lieber, Robert 2001. No Common Power: Understanding International Relations. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
146. Linklater, Andrew 1990. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. London: Macmillan.
147. Linklater, Andrew. 1992. “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View,” Millennium 21: 77-98.
148. Linklater, Andrew. 1997. “The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations,” Review of International Studies 23: 321-338.
149. Linklater, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
150. Linklater, Andrew. 2001. “Rationalism.” In Scott Burchill, Richard Devetak, Andrew Linklater, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit, and Jacqui True, Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
151. Lobell, Steven, Norrin Ripsman, and Jeffrey Taliaferro (eds.) 2009. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
152. Lynch, Mark 1999. State Interests and Public Spheres: The International Politics of Jordan’s Identity. New York: Columbia University Press.
153. Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
154. Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and Michael Tierney 2007. The View from the Ivory Tower: TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in the United States and Canada. Williamsburg, VA: The Program on the Theory and Practice of International Relations.
155. March, James and Johan Olsen 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
156. March, James and Johan Olsen. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52: 943-969.
157. Martin, Lisa and Beth Simmons 1998. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,” International Organization 52: 729-757.
158. Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott Feld 2007. “The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update,” PS: Political Science & Politics 40: 133-145.
159. Mattern, Janice Bially 2005a. Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force. London: Routledge.
160. Mattern, Janice Bially. 2005b. “Why Soft Power Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics,” Millennium 33: 583-612.
161. Mearsheimer, John 1983. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
162. Mearsheimer, John. 1994/1995. “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19: 5-49.
163. Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.
164. Mearsheimer, John. 2005. “E. H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On,” International Relations 19: 139-152.
165. Mercer, Jonathan 1995. “Anarchy and Identity,” International Organization 49: 229-252.
166. Mill, John Stuart 1863. Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourne.
167. Milliken, Jennifer 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods,” European Journal of International Relations 5: 225-254.
168. Milner, Helen 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
169. Mitchell, Ronald 1994. “Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance,” International Organization 48: 425-458.
170. Monroe, Kristen Renwick (ed.) 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
171. Morgenthau, Hans 1946. Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
172. Morgenthau, Hans. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
173. Morgenthau, Hans. 1967. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
174. Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
175. Murphy, Craig 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850. New York: Oxford University Press.
176. Morgenthau, Hans. 2001 “Political Consequences of the New Inequality,” International Studies Quarterly 45: 347-356.
177. Morgenthau, Hans. 2007. “The Promise of Critical IR, Partially Kept,” Review of International Studies 33: 117-133.
178. Murphy, Craig and Douglas Nelson 2001. “International Political Economy: A Tale of Two Hederodoxies,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3: 393-412.
179. Murray, Alastair 1997. Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
180. New York Times 2002. “A War With Iraq is Not in America’s National Interest,” paid advertisement, September 26.
181. Nexon, Daniel 2009. “The Balance of Power in the Balance,” World Politics 61: 330-359.
182. Nielson, Daniel and Michael Tierney 2003. “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform,” International Organization 57: 241-276.
183. Oborne, Peter 2002. “Who Inspired Thatcher’s Most Damaging Remark? Tony Blair’s Favourite Guru,” The Spectator, August 24.
184. Onuf, Nicholas 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
185. Onuf, Nicholas. 1998. “Constructivism: A User’s Manual.” In Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
186. Onuf, Nicholas and Frank Klink 1989. “Activity, Authority, Rule,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 149-174.
187. Oren, Ido. 2000. “Is Culture Independent of National Security? How America’s National Security Concerns Shaped ‘Political Culture’ Research,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 543-573.
188. Oren, Ido. 2006. “Can Political Science Emulate the Natural Sciences? The Problem of Self-Disconfirming Analysis,” Polity 38: 72-100.
189. Oren, Ido. 2009. “The Unrealism of Contemporary Realism: The Tension between Realist Theory and Realists’ Practice,” Perspectives on Politics 7: 283-301.
190. Oren, Ido and Ty Solomon 2008. “WMD: Words of Mass Destruction,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco.
191. Owen, John 1994. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace,” International Security 19: 87-125.
192. Oxford University Press 2002. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
193. Patomaki, Heikki and Colin Wight 2000. “After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 213-237.
194. Pettman, Ralph 2000. Commonsense Constructivism: Or the Making of World Affairs. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
195. Pichler, Hans-Karl 1998. “The Godfathers of ‘Truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau’s Theory of Power Politics,” Review of International Studies 24: 185-200.
196. Pollack, Mark 1997. “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda-Setting in the European Community,” International Organization 51: 99-134.
197. Posen, Barry 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
198. Price, Richard and Christian Reus-Smit 1998. “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism,” European Journal of International Relations 4: 259-294.
199. Rawls, John 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
200. Reus-Smit, Christian 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
201. Reus-Smit, Christian. 2001a. “Constructivism.” In Scott Burchill, Richard Devetak, Andrew Linklater, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit, and Jacqui True, Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
202. Reus-Smit, Christian. 2001b. “The Strange Death of Liberal International Theory,” European Journal of International Law 12: 573-594.
203. Risse, Thomas 2000. “‘Let’s Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54: 1-39.
204. Risse, Thomas, Stephen Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.) 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
205. Rommen, Hans 1944. “Realism and Utopianism in World Affairs,” Review of Politics 6: 193-215.
206. Rosati, Jerel 2000. “The Power of Human Cognition in the Study of World Politics,” International Studies Review 2: 45-75.
207. Rose, Gideon 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51: 144-172.
208. Rosecrance, Richard, 2001. “Has Realism Become Cost-Benefit Analysis? A Review Essay,” International Security 26: 132-154.
209. Rosenthal, Joel 1991. Righteous Realists: Political Realism, Responsible Power, and American Culture in the Nuclear Age. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
210. Ruggie, John Gerard 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organizations 36: 379-415.
211. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity,” World Politics 35: 261-285.
212. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993 (ed.). Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.
213. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. “What Makes the World Hand Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization 52: 858-885.
214. Russett, Bruce 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
215. Russett, Bruce and John Oneal 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.
216. Scheuerman, William 2007a. “Carl Schmitt and Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond.” In Michael Williams (ed.), Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
217. Scheuerman, William. 2007b. “Was Morgenthau a Realist? Revisiting Scientific Man vs. Power Politics,” Constellations 14: 506-530.
218. Schmidt, Brian 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
219. Schmitt, Carl 1976. The Concept of the Political, trans. George Schwab. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
220. Schulz, William 2001. In Our Own Best Interest: How Defending Human Rights Benefits All Americans. Boston: Beacon Press.
221. Schuman, Frederick 1933. International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. New York: McGraw-Hill.
222. Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine 2005. “The Graduate Student Experience: ‘Hegemony’ or Balance in Methodological Training?” In Kristen Renwick Monroe (ed.), Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
223. Schweller, Randall 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in,” International Security 19: 72-107.
224. Schweller, Randall. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.
225. Schweller, Randall. 2003. “The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism.” In Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
226. Scott, John 2000. “Rational Choice Theory.” In Gary Browning, Abigail Halcli, and Frank Webster (eds.), Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. London: Sage.
227. Shannon, Vaughn 2000. “Norms are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 293-316.
228. Sikkink, Kathryn 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47: 411-441.
229. Singer, J. David 1990. Models, Methods, and Progress in World Politics: A Peace Research Odyssey. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
230. Smith, Steve 2000. “Wendt’s World,” Review of International Studies 26: 151-163.
231. Smith, Steve. 2002. “The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline,’” International Studies Review 4: 67-85.
232. Spegele, Roger 1996. Political Realism in International Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
233. Steele, Brent 2007. “Liberal-Idealism: A Constructivist Critique,” International Studies Review 9: 23-52.
234. Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2000. “Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 97-119.
235. Smith, Steve. 2002. “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading,” International Studies Review 4: 73-97.
236. Smith, Steve. 2004. “Realist-Constructivism and Morality,” International Studies Review 6: 341-343.
237. Smith, Steve. 2006a. “Lamarckian with a Vengeance: Human Nature and American International Relations Theory,” Journal of International Relations and Development 9: 227-246.
238. Smith, Steve. 2006b. “Constructivism.” In Sterling-Folker (ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
239. Smith, Steve. 2009. “Realist Theorizing as Tradition: Forward Is as Forward Does.” In Annette Freyberg-Inan, Patrick James, and Ewan Harrison (eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
240. Sterling-Folker, Jennifer and Rosemary Shinko 2005. “Discourses of Power: Traversing the Realist-Postmodern Divide,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33: 637-664.
241. Strange, Susan 1987. “The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony,” International Organization 41: 551-574.
242. Swedberg, Richard 2005. “Can There Be a Sociological Concept of Interest?” Theory and Society 34: 359-390.
243. Tannenwald, Nina 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use,” International Organization 53: 433-468.
244. Vasquez, John 1983. The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
245. Vasquez, John. 1983. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
246. Waever, Ole 1996. “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate.” In Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
247. Waever, Ole. 1997. “Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms.” In Iver Neumann and Ole Waever (eds.), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? London: Routledge.
248. Walker, R. B. J. 1987. “Realism, Change, and International Political Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 31: 65-86.
249. Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
250. Wallerstein, Immanuel 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
251. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
252. Walt, Stephen 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
253. Waltz, Kenneth 1959. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
254. Waltz, Kenneth. 1967. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Boston: Little, Brown.
255. Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
256. Waltz, Kenneth. 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics.” In Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
257. Wendt, Alexander 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41: 335-370.
258. Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46: 391-425.
259. Wendt, Alexander. 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review 88: 384-396.
260. Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
261. Wendt, Alexander. 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable,” European Journal of International Relations 9: 491-542.
262. Wight, Colin 2006. Agents, Structures, and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
263. Wight, Colin. 2007. “A Manifesto for Scientific Realism in IR: Assuming the Can- Opener Won’t Work!” Millennium 35: 379-398.
264. Wight, Martin 1946. Power Politics. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
265. Williams, Michael 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
266. Wolfers, Arnold 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
267. Wyn Jones, Richard, (ed.) 2001. Critical Theory & World Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
268. Zehfuss, Maja 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
269. Zizek, Slavoj. 2000. The Fragile Absolute - Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? New York: Verso.