The Balance of Power in the Balance

World Politics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 330-359

  Nexon, Daniel H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77349096036     PISSN: 00438871     EISSN: 10863338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0043887109000124     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Adamson, Fiona B. 2005. “Global Liberalism versus Political Islam: Competing Ideological Frameworks in International Politics.” International Studies Review 7, no. 4 (December): 547–69.
2. Ashley, Richard. 1986. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” In Robert O. Keohane, ed., Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press: 255–300.
3. Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59, no. 1 (February): 39–75.
4. Bell, Duncan S. A., and Paul K. MacDonald. 2001. “Correspondence: Start the Evolution without Us.” International Security 26, no. 1 (Summer): 187–94.
5. Bernier, Justin. 2003. “China's Strategic Proxies.” Orbis 47, no. 4 (Autumn): 629–43.
6. Bially Mattern, Janice. 2005. “Why Soft Power Isn't So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics.” Millennium 33, no. 3 (June): 583–612.
7. Boucoyannis, Deborah. 2007. “The International Wanderings of a Liberal Idea, or Why Liberals Can Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Balance of Power.” Perspectives on Politics 5, no. 4 (December): 703–27.
8. Brooks, Stephen G., and William C. Wohlforth. 2005a. “Hard Times for Soft Balancing.” International Security 30, no. 1 (Summer): 72–108.
9. Brooks, Stephen G., and William C. Wohlforth. 2005b. “International Relations Theory and the Case against Unilateralism.” Perspectives on Politics 3, no. 3 (September): 509–24.
10. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Silverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Carr, E. H. 1946. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. London, Macmillan.
13. Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1994. “Emergent Polarity: Analyzing State-Formation and Power Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 38, no. 4 (December): 501–33.
14. Cerny, Philip G. 1995. “Globalization and the Changing Logic of Collective Action.” International Organization 49, no. 4 (Autumn): 595–625.
15. Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio. 1996. “Origins and Evolution of War and Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 40, no. 1 (March): 1–22.
16. Crawford, Timothy W. 2008a. “Wedge Strategies in Power Politics.” Manuscript, Boston College, Boston: 42.
17. Crawford, Timothy W. 2008b. “Wedge Strategy, Balancing, and the Deviant Case of Spain, 1940–1941.” Security Studies 17, no. 1 (January): 1–38.
18. David, Steven R. 1991. “Explaining Third World Alignment.” World Politics 43, no. 2 (January): 233–56.
19. Deudney, Daniel. 2006. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry. 1999. “The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order.” Review of International Studies 25, no. 2 (April): 179–96.
21. Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman. 1995. “Correspondence: History vs. Neo-Realism: A Second Look.” International Security 20, no. 1 (Summer): 182–93.
22. Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Goddard, Stacie E. 2008–9. “When Right Makes Might: How Prussia Overturned the European Balance of Power.” International Security 33, no. 3 (Winter): 110–42.
24. Goddard, Stacie E., and Daniel Nexon. 2005. “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 1 (March): 9–61.
25. Haas, Ernst B. 1953. “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept, or Propaganda.” World Politics 5, no. 4 (July): 442–77.
26. Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Ikenberry, G. John, ed. 2002a. America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
28. Ikenberry, G. John. 2002b. Introduction. In G. John Ikenberry, ed., America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press: 1–26.
29. Jackson, Patrick. 2004. “Bridging the Gap: Toward a Realist-Constructivist Dialgoue.” International Studies Review 6, no. 2 (June): 337–52.
30. Joffe, Joseph. 2002. “Defying History and Theory: The United States as the ‘Last Remaining Superpower.’” In G. John Ikenberry, ed., America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press: 155–80.
31. Jourde, Cédric. 2007. “The International Relations of Small Neoauthoritarian States: Islamism, Warlordism, and the Framing of Stability.” International Studies Quarterly 51, no. 2 (June): 481–503.
32. Katzenstein, Peter J., and Nobu Okarawa. 2001–2. “Japan, Asia-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism.” International Security 26, no. 1 (Winter): 153–85.
33. Kaufman, Stuart. 1997. “The Fragmentation and Consolidation of International Systems.” International Organization 51, no. 2 (Spring): 173–208.
34. Keohane, Robert O., ed. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
35. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. 1989. Power and Interdependence. New York: HarperCollins.
36. Lake, David A. 2003. “The New Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Studies Review 5, no. 3 (September): 303–24.
37. Layne, Christopher. 1993. “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Arise.” International Security 17, no. 4 (Winter): 5–51.
38. Layne, Christopher. 1997. “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy.” International Security 22, no. 1 (Summer): 86–124.
39. Legro, Jeffrey W. 2007. Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press.
40. Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik. 1999. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24, no. 2 (Autumn): 5–55.
41. Lieber, Keir A., and Gerard Alexander. 2005. “Waiting for Balancing: Why the World Is Not Pushing Back.” International Security 30, no. 1 (Summer): 109–39.
42. Little, Richard. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Mahoney, James. 2004. “Revisiting General Theory in Historical Sociology.” Social Forces 83, no. 2 (December): 459–89.
44. Martin, Lisa L. 1992. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism.” International Organization 46, no. 4 (Autumn): 765–92.
45. McDermott, Roger. 2007. “The Rising Dragon: ‘sco Peace Mission 2007.’” Occasional Papers. Washington, D.C.: The Jamestown Foundation: 24.
46. Mearsheimer, John. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War.” International Security 15, no. 1 (Summer): 5–56.
47. Monten, Jonathan. 2006. “Thucydides and Modern Realism.” International Studies Quarterly 50, no. 1 (March): 3–25.
48. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations. New York: Knopf.
49. Narziny, Kevin. 2003. “The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain's Commitments to Europe, 1905–1939.” International Security 27, no. 4 (Spring): 184–219.
50. Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Nexon, Daniel H., and Thomas Wright. 2007. “What's at Stake in the American Empire Debate.” American Political Science Review 101, no. 2 (May): 253–71.
52. Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
53. Organski, A. F. K. 1958. World Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
54. Owen, John M. 2005. “When Do Ideologies Produce Alliances? The Holy Roman Empire, 1517–1555.” International Studies Quarterly 49, no. 1 (March): 73–99.
55. Pape, Robert A. 2003. “The World Pushes Back.” Boston Globe. Boston: H1.
56. Pape, Robert A. 2005. “Soft Balancing against the United States.” International Security 30, no. 1 (Summer): 7–45.
57. Parker, Geoffrey. 1977. The Dutch Revolt. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
58. Paul, T. V. 2005. “Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy.” International Security 30, no. 1 (Summer): 46–71.
59. Petrova, Margarita H. 2003. “The End of the Cold War: A Battle or Bridging Ground between Rationalist and Ideational Approaches in International Relations?” European Journal of International Relations 9, no. 1 (March): 115–63.
60. Rathbun, Brian C. 2007. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51, no. 3 (September): 533–57.
61. Rose, Gideon. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51, no. 1 (October): 144–72.
62. Schweller, R and all L. 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In.” International Security 19, no. 1 (Summer): 72–107.
63. Schweller, R and all L., and William C. Wohlforth. 2000. “Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War.” Security Studies 9, no. 3: 60–107.
64. Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
65. Thayer, Bradley. 2000. “Bringing in Darwin: Evolutionary Theory, Realism, and International Politics.” International Security 25, no. 2 (Fall): 124–51.
66. Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Addison-Wesley.
67. Vasquez, John A., and Colin Elman, eds. 2003. Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate. Prentice Hall Studies in International Relations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
68. Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
69. Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Addison-Wesley.
70. Waltz, Kenneth. 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics.” In Robert O. Keohane, ed., Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press: 322–46.
71. Waltz, Kenneth. 1993. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics.” International Security 18, no. 2 (Fall): 45–73.
72. Waltz, Kenneth. 2000. “Structural Realism after the Cold War.” International Security 25, no. 1 (Summer): 5–41.
73. Wendt, Alexander. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41, no. 3 (Summer): 335–70.
74. Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Williams, Michael C. 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Wohlforth, William C. 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security 24, no. 1 (Summer): 5–41.
77. Wohlforth, William C., Richard Little, Stuart J. Kaufman, David Kang, Charles A. Jones, Victoria Tin-bor Hui, Arthur M. Eckstein, Daniel Deudney, and William J. Brenner. 2007. “Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History.” European Journal of International Relations 13, no. 2 (June): 155–85.