From isotropic to anisotropic side chain representations: Comparison of three models for residue contact estimation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Sun, Weitao ^a   He, Jing ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Old Dominion University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; ASPARTIC ACID; GLUTAMIC ACID; PHENYLALANINE; TYROSINE; VALINE; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID RESIDUE CONTACT DISTANCE; ANISOTROPIC ELLIPSOID SIDE CHAIN MODEL; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ATOM DISTANCE CRITERIA MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ISOTROPIC SPHERE SIDE CHAIN MODEL; MODEL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

ANISOTROPY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 79955715044     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019238     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
2. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA, (1975) Model of Protein Folding- Inclusion of Short-Range, Medium-Range, and Long-Range Interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72: 3802-3806.
3. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL, (1985) Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18: 534-552.
4. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL, (1996) Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 256: 623-644.
5. Bethe HA, (1935) Statistical Theory of Superlattices. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 150: 552-575.
6. Chang TS, (1939) Statistical Theory of the Adsorption of Double Molecules. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 169: 512-531.
7. Rushbrooke GS, (1938) A Note on Guggenheim's Theory of Strictly Regular Binary Liquid Mixtures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 166: 296-315.
8. Miyazawa S, (1983) Cooperative ligand binding on multidimensional lattices: Bethe approximation. Biopolymers 22: 2253-2271.
9. Guggenheim EA, (1932) On the Statistical Mechanics of Dilute and of Perfect Solutions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 135: 181-192.
10. Guggenheim EA, (1935) The Statistical Mechanics of Regular Solutions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 148: 304-312.
11. Guggenheim EA, (1938) The Statistical Mechanics of Co-operative Assemblies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 169: 134-148.
12. Guggenheim EA, (1944) Statistical Thermodynamics of Mixtures with Non-Zero Energies of Mixing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 183: 213-227.
13. Guggenheim EA, (1944) Statistical Thermodynamics of Mixtures with Zero Energies of Mixing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 183: 203-212.
14. Sippl MJ, (1990) Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 213: 859-883.
15. Lu H, Skolnick J, (2001) A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 44: 223-232.
16. Samudrala R, Moult J, (1998) An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology 275: 895-916.
17. Buchete NV, Straub JE, Thirumalai D, (2004) Continuous anisotropic representation of coarse-grained potentials for proteins by spherical harmonics synthesis. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling 22: 441-450.
18. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL, (2005) How effective for fold recognition is a potential of mean force that includes relative orientations between contacting residues in proteins? J Chem Phys 122: 024901.
19. Lin W, Sun F, Rao ZH, (2002) Tri-residue contact potential: a new knowledge-based energetic method. Progress in Natural Science 12: 826-840.
20. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, (1992) Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J Mol Biol 227: 227-238.
21. Godzik A, Skolnick J, (1992) Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to supersecondary and tertiary structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 12098-12102.
22. Singh RK, Tropsha A, Vaisman II, (1996) Delaunay tessellation of proteins: four body nearest-neighbor propensities of amino acid residues. J Comput Biol 3: 213-221.
23. Munson PJ, Singh RK, (1997) Multi-body interactions within the graph of protein structure. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 5: 198-201.
24. Munson PJ, Singh RK, (1997) Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci 6: 1467-1481.
25. Mayewski S, (2005) A multibody, whole-residue potential for protein structures, with testing by Monte Carlo simulated annealing. Proteins 59: 152-169.
26. Carter CW Jr, LeFebvre BC, Cammer SA, Tropsha A, Edgell MH, (2001) Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations. Journal of Molecular Biology 311: 625-638.
27. Gan HH, Tropsha A, Schlick T, (2001) Lattice protein folding with two and four-body statistical potentials. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 43: 161-174.
28. Deutsch C, Krishnamoorthy B, (2007) Four-Body Scoring Function for Mutagenesis. Bioinformatics 23: 3009-3015.
29. Feng YP, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, (2007) Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 68: 57-66.
30. Krishnamoorthy B, Tropsha A, (2003) Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from non-native protein conformations. Bioinformatics 19: 1540-1548.
31. Zhang C, Kim SH, (2000) Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97: 2550-2555.
32. Sippl MJ, (1993) Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17: 355-362.
33. DeBolt SE, Skolnick J, (1996) Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of protein structures: atomic burial position and pairwise non-bonded interactions. Protein Eng 9: 637-655.
34. Gatchell DW, Dennis S, Vajda S, (2000) Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions. Proteins 41: 518-534.
35. Topf M, Sali A, (2005) Combining electron microscopy and comparative protein structure modeling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15: 578-585.
36. Topf M, Baker ML, Marti-Renom MA, Chiu W, Sali A, (2006) Refinement of protein structures by iterative comparative modeling and CryoEM density fitting. J Mol Biol 357: 1655-1668.
37. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM, (1992) Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 227: 876-888.
38. Sippl MJ, Weitckus S, (1992) Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins 13: 258-271.
39. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE, (1993) An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 16: 92-112.
40. Jones DT, Thornton JM, (1996) Potential energy functions for threading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6: 210-216.
41. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL, (1999) An empirical energy potential with a reference state for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 36: 357-369.
42. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL, (2000) Identifying sequence-structure pairs undetected by sequence alignments. Protein Eng 13: 459-475.
43. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz A, (2000) Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins 38: 3-16.
44. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, Floeckner H, Froschauer R, et al. (1990) Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 216: 167-180.
45. Casari G, Sippl MJ, (1992) Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. J Mol Biol 224: 725-732.
46. Bauer A, Beyer A, (1994) An improved pair potential to recognize native protein folds. Proteins 18: 254-261.
47. Samudrala R, Moult J, (1998) An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 275: 895-916.
48. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, et al. (1999) Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 34: 82-95.
49. Sun WT, He J, (2009) Native secondary structure topology has near minimum contact energy among all possible geometrically constrained topologies. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 77: 159-173.
50. Sun WT, He J, (2009) Reduction of the secondary structure topological space through direct estimation of the contact energy formed by the secondary structures. BMC Bioinformatics 10 (suppl 1): S40.
51. Al Nasr K, Sun WT, He J, (2010) Structure prediction for the helical skeletons detected from the low resolution protein density map. BMC Bioinformatics 11 (suppl 1): S44.
52. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D, (1991) A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253: 164-170.
53. Sun S, (1993) Reduced representation model of protein structure prediction: statistical potential and genetic algorithms. Protein Sci 2: 762-785.
54. Tobi D, Elber R, (2000) Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: results from linear optimization. Proteins 41: 40-46.
55. Tobi D, Shafran G, Linial N, Elber R, (2000) On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. Proteins 40: 71-85.
56. Li J, Wang J, Wang W, (2008) Identifying folding nucleus based on residue contact networks of proteins. Proteins 71: 1899-1907.
57. Kannan N, Vishveshwara S, (1999) Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method. J Mol Biol 292: 441-464.
58. Greene LH, Higman VA, (2003) Uncovering network systems within protein structures. J Mol Biol 334: 781-791.
59. Cohen M, Potapov V, Schreiber G, (2009) Four Distances between Pairs of Amino Acids Provide a Precise Description of their Interaction. Plos Computational Biology 5: e1000470.
60. Melo F, Sanchez R, Sali A, (2002) Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci 11: 430-448.
61. Zhou H, Zhou Y, (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 11: 2714-2726.
62. Levitt M, Warshel A, (1975) Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 253: 694-698.
63. Levitt M, (1976) A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol 104: 59-107.
64. Lee J, Liwo A, Scheraga HA, (1999) Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice united-residue force field: application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and to apo calbindin D9K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 2025-2030.
65. Lee J, Ripoll DR, Czaplewski C, Pillardy J, Wedemeyer WJ, et al. (2001) Optimization of parameters in macromolecular potential energy functions by conformational space annealing. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 105: 7291-7298.
66. Liwo A, Arlukowicz P, Czaplewski C, Oldziej S, Pillardy J, et al. (2002) A method for optimizing potential-energy functions by a hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape: Application to the UNRES force field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 1937-1942.
67. Manavalan P, Ponnuswamy PK, (1977) Study of Preferred Environment of Amino-Acid Residues in Globular Proteins. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 184: 476-487.
68. Manavalan P, Ponnuswamy PK, (1978) Hydrophobic Character of Amino-Acid Residues in Globular Proteins. Nature 275: 673-674.
69. Gromiha MM, Selvaraj S, (1999) Amino acid clustering pattern and medium and long-range interactions in (alpha/beta)(8) barrel proteins. Periodicum Biologorum 101: 333-338.
70. Selvaraj S, Gromiha MM, (2000) Inter-residue interactions in protein structures. Current Science 78: 129-131.
71. Debe DA, Goddard WA, (1999) First principles prediction of protein folding rates. Journal of Molecular Biology 294: 619-625.
72. Gromiha MM, Selvaraj S, (1999) Importance of long-range interactions in protein folding. Biophysical Chemistry 77: 49-68.
73. Gromiha MM, (2001) Important inter-residue contacts for enhancing the thermal stability of thermophilic proteins. Biophysical Chemistry 91: 71-77.
74. Atilgan AR, Akan P, Baysal C, (2004) Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophysical Journal 86: 85-91.
75. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL, (2002) Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297: 1551-1555.
76. Tudos E, Fiser A, Simon I, (1994) Different Sequence Environments of Amino-Acid-Residues Involved and Not Involved in Long-Range Interactions in Proteins. International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research 43: 205-208.
77. Barah P, Sinha S, (2008) Analysis of protein folds using protein contact networks. Pramana-Journal of Physics 71: 369-378.
78. Yang L, Song G, Jernigan RL, (2009) Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 12347-12352.
79. Rao F, Caflisch A, (2004) The protein folding network. Journal of Molecular Biology 342: 299-306.
80. Bode C, Kovacs IA, Szalay MS, Palotai R, Korcsmaros T, et al. (2007) Network analysis of protein dynamics. FEBS Letters 581: 2776-2782.
81. Krishnan A, Zbilut JP, Tomita M, Giuliani A, (2008) Proteins as networks: Usefulness of graph theory in protein science. Current Protein & Peptide Science 9: 28-38.
82. Chandrasekaran R, Ramachandran GN, (1970) Studies on the conformation of amino acids. XI. Analysis of the observed side group conformation in proteins. Int J Protein Res 2: 223-233.
83. Sasisekharan V, Ponnuswamy PK, (1970) Backbone and side-chain conformations of amino acids and amino acid residues in peptides. Biopolymers 9: 1249-1256.
84. von Schnakenburg K, (1971) [Light and electron microscopy studies on brain tissue changes in acute experimental oxygen intoxication]. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 8: 230-242.
85. Janin J, Wodak S, (1978) Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. J Mol Biol 125: 357-386.
86. Bhat TN, Sasisekharan V, Vijayan M, (1979) An analysis of side-chain conformation in proteins. Int J Pept Protein Res 13: 170-184.
87. Benedetti E, Morelli G, Nemethy G, Scheraga HA, (1983) Statistical and energetic analysis of side-chain conformations in oligopeptides. Int J Pept Protein Res 22: 1-15.
88. James MN, Sielecki AR, (1983) Structure and refinement of penicillopepsin at 1.8 A resolution. J Mol Biol 163: 299-361.
89. Ponder JW, Richards FM, (1987) Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol 193: 775-791.
90. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, (2000) The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 40: 389-408.
91. Richardson DC, Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, et al. (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography 66: 12-21.
92. Gilat A, (2004) MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications 2nd Edition: John Wiley & Sons.
93. Sun W, He J, (2010) Understanding on the Residue Contact Network Using the Log-Normal Cluster Model and the Multilevel Wheel Diagram. Biopolymers 93: 904-916.
94. Wang W, Wang J, Kim M-S, (2001) An algebraic condition for the separation of two ellipsoids. Comput Aided Geom Des 18: 531-539.
95. Wang W, Choi Y-K, Chan B, Kim M-S, Wang J, (2004) Efficient collision detection for moving ellipsoids using separating planes. Computing 72: 235-246.
96. Sun W, He J, (2009) Effect of sidechain anisotropy on residue contact determination. In: Chen J, Reddy CK, Chen X, Ruan J, Ely J, editors. pp. 181-188 2009 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops; 2009 Nov; Washington D.C, USA.
97. Lu M, Dousis AD, Ma J, (2008) OPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. J Mol Biol 376: 288-301.
98. Karnesky RA, Sudbrack CK, Seidman DN, (2007) Best-fit ellipsoids of atom-probe tomographic data to study coalescence of gamma' (L1(2)) precipitates in Ni-Al-Cr. Scripta Materialia 57: 353-356.
99. Nye JF, (1985) Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices: Oxford University Press.
100. Forsythe GE, Henrici P, (1960) The Cyclic Jacobi Method for Computing the Principal Values of a Complex Matrix. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 94: 1-23.