Four distances between pairs of amino acids provide a precise description of their interaction

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2009, Pages

  Cohen, Mati ^a   Potapov, Vladimir ^a   Schreiber, Gideon ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAINS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; PROTEINS;

AMINO ACID RESIDUES; AMINO-ACIDS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE DATA; DIMENSIONAL GRIDS; DISTANCE DATUM; DISTANCE DISTRIBUTIONS; NMR DATA; RANDOM MODEL; SIDE-CHAINS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF PROTEIN;

AMINO ACIDS;

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HISTOGRAM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 70049115535     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000470     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181: 223-230.
2. Lu H, Skolnick J (2001) A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 44: 223-232. (Pubitemid 32702231)
3. Ferrada E, Vergara IA, Melo F (2007) A knowledge-based potential with an accurate description of local interactions improves discrimination between native and near-native protein conformations. Cell Biochem Biophys 49: 111-124. (Pubitemid 47574996)
4. Qiu J, Elber R (2005) Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures. Proteins 61: 44-55. (Pubitemid 41262916)
5. Summa CM, Levitt M (2007) Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3177-3182.
6. Ferrada E, Melo F (2007) Nonbonded terms extrapolated from nonlocal knowledge-based energy functions improve error detection in near-native protein structure models. Protein Sci 16: 1410-1421. (Pubitemid 46984875)
7. Narang P, Bhushan K, Bose S, Jayaram B (2006) Protein structure evaluation using an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function. J Biomol Struct Dyn 23: 385-406. (Pubitemid 43099652)
8. Shen MY, Sali A (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 15: 2507-2524. (Pubitemid 44771688)
9. Buchete NV, Straub JE, Thirumalai D (2004) Development of novel statistical potentials for protein fold recognition. Curr Opin Struc Biol 14: 225-232. (Pubitemid 38490789)
10. Clark LA, van Vlijmen HW (2008) A knowledge-based forcefield for protein-protein interface design. Proteins 70: 1540-1550.
11. Zheng S, Robertson TA, Varani G (2007) A knowledge-based potential function predicts the specificity and relative binding energy of RNA-binding proteins. Febs J 274: 6378-6391. (Pubitemid 350215927)
12. Audie J, Scarlata S (2007) A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein-protein binding affinities. Biophys Chem 129: 198-211. (Pubitemid 47202023)
13. Liu S, Zhang C, Zhou H, Zhou Y (2004) A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins 56: 93-101. (Pubitemid 38720841)
14. Robertson TA, Varani G (2007) An all-atom, distance-dependent scoring function for the prediction of protein-DNA interactions from structure. Proteins 66: 359-374.
15. Vajda S, Sippl M, Novotny J (1997) Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7: 222-228. (Pubitemid 27156721)
16. Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G (2000) Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 295: 337-356. (Pubitemid 30045364)
17. Kumar N, Mohanty D (2007) MODPROPEP: a program for knowledge-based modeling of protein-peptide complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W549-W555.
18. Jiang L, Gao Y, Mao F, Liu Z, Lai L (2002) Potential of mean force for protein-protein interaction studies. Proteins 46: 190-196. (Pubitemid 34052072)
19. Zhao G, Carson MB, Lu H (2007) Prediction of specific protein-DNA recognition by knowledge-based two-body and three-body interaction potentials. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007: 5017-5020.
20. Floudas CA, Fung HK, McAllister SR, Monnigmann M, Rajgaria R (2006) Advances in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design: A review. Chem Eng Sci 61: 966-988. (Pubitemid 41655853)
21. Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ (1995) Are database-derived potentials valid for scoring both forward and inverted protein folding? Protein Eng 8: 849-858.
22. Hu CY, Li X, Liang J (2004) Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design. Bioinformatics 20: 3080-3098. (Pubitemid 39619199)
23. Mendes J, Guerois R, Serrano L (2002) Energy estimation in protein design. Curr Opin Struc Biol 12: 441-446.
24. Morozov AV, Kortemme T (2006) Potential functions for hydrogen bonds in protein structure prediction and design. Adv Protein Chem 72: 1-+.
25. Khatun J, Khare SD, Dokholyan NV (2004) Can contact potentials reliably predict stability of proteins? J Mol Biol 336: 1223-1238.
26. Zhou H, Zhou Y (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 11: 2714-2726. (Pubitemid 35191145)
27. Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ (2005) Protein sequence randomization: efficient estimation of protein stability using knowledge-based potentials. J Mol Biol 345: 1199-1212. (Pubitemid 40092234)
28. Zhou Y, Zhou H, Zhang C, Liu S (2006) What is a desirable statistical energy function for proteins and how can it be obtained? Cell Biochem Biophys 46: 165-174.
29. Cheng J, Pei JF, Lai LH (2007) A free-rotating and self-avoiding chain model for deriving statistical potentials based on protein structures. Biophys J 92: 3868-3877. (Pubitemid 46910573)
30. Hao MH, Scheraga HA (1999) Designing potential energy functions for protein folding. Curr Opin Struc Biol 9: 184-188. (Pubitemid 29452896)
31. Pokala N, Handel TM (2005) Energy functions for protein design: Adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. J Mol Biol 347: 203-227. (Pubitemid 40283639)
32. Ben-Naim A (1997) Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: Are these meaningful potentials? Journal of Chemical Physics 107.
33. Thomas PD, Dill KA (1996) Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol 257: 457-469.
34. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383: 66-93. (Pubitemid 38401787)
35. Russ WP, Ranganathan R (2002) Knowledge-based potential functions in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12: 447-452.
36. Reichmann D, Rahat O, Albeck S, Meged R, Dym O, et al. (2005) The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 57-62. (Pubitemid 40094428)
37. Feng Y, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL (2007) Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys. Proteins 68: 57-66. (Pubitemid 46876534)
38. Carter CW, LeFebvre BC, Cammer SA, Tropsha A, Edgell MH (2001) Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations. J Mol Biol 311: 625-638. (Pubitemid 32803725)
39. Mayewski S (2005) A multibody, whole-residue potential for protein structures, with testing by Monte Carlo simulated annealing. Proteins 59: 152-169.
40. Summa CM, Levitt M, DeGrado WF (2005) An atomic environment potential for use in protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 352: 986-1001. (Pubitemid 41267083)
41. Heo MY, Cheon MY, Moon EJ, Kim S, Chung K, et al. (2005) Extension of the pairwise-contact energy parameters for proteins with the local environments of amino acids. Physica A 351: 439-447. (Pubitemid 40467010)
42. Sippl MJ (1990) Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 213: 859-883.
43. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL (1985) Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal-structures - quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18: 534-552.
44. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA (1976) Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 9: 945-950.
45. Melo F, Feytmans E (1997) Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J Mol Biol 267: 207-222. (Pubitemid 27149749)
46. Fang Q, Shortle D (2006) Protein refolding in silico with atom-based statistical potentials and conformational search using a simple genetic algorithm. J Mol Biol 359: 1456-1467. (Pubitemid 43903493)
47. Dehouck Y, Gilis D, Rooman M (2006) A new generation of statistical potentials for proteins. Biophys J 90: 4010-4017. (Pubitemid 43846117)
48. DeWitte RS, Shakhnovich EI (1994) Pseudodihedrals: simplified protein backbone representation with knowledge-based energy. Protein Sci 3: 1570-1581.
49. Tobi D, Elber R (2000) Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: Results from linear optimization. Proteins 41: 40-46.
50. Zomorodian A, Guibas L, Koehl P (2006) Geometric filtering of pairwise atomic interactions applied to the design of efficient statistical potentials. Comput Aided Geom D 23: 531-544. (Pubitemid 43993829)
51. Solis AD, Rackovsky S (2008) Information and discrimination in pairwise contact potentials. Proteins 71: 1071-1087.
52. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D (1999) Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 8: 361-369.
53. Rykunov D, Fiser A (2007) Effects of amino acid composition, finite size of proteins, and sparse statistics on distance-dependent statistical pair potentials. Proteins 67: 559-568. (Pubitemid 46625573)
54. Furuichi E, Koehl P (1998) Influence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials. Proteins 31: 139-149. (Pubitemid 28198706)
55. Samudrala R, Moult J (1998) Determinants of side chain conformational preferences in protein structures. Protein Eng 11: 991-997. (Pubitemid 28548492)
56. Zhou HY, Zhou YQ (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 11: 2714-2726.
57. Melo F, Sanchez R, Sali A (2002) Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci 11: 430-448.
58. Lee B, Kurochkina N, Kang HS (1996) Protein folding by a biased Monte Carlo procedure in the dihedral angle space. FASEB J 10: 119-125. (Pubitemid 26035514)
59. Lu M, Dousis AD, Ma J (2008) OPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. J Mol Biol 376: 288-301.
60. Bohr J, Bohr H, Brunak S, Cotterill RM, Fredholm H, et al. (1993) Protein structures from distance inequalities. J Mol Biol 231: 861-869.
61. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ (1999) Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 35: 364-373. (Pubitemid 29200974)
62. Wang G, Dunbrack RLJ (2003) PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19: 1589-1591. (Pubitemid 37038881)
63. Prilusky J (1996) OCA, a browser-database for protein structure/function. .
64. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
65. IUPAC-IUB commission on biochemical nomenclature (1970) Abbreviations and symbols for description of conformation of polypeptide chains - tentative rules (1969). JBC 245: 6489-6497.
66. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D (2003) An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 326: 1239-1259. (Pubitemid 36263395)