A multibody, whole-residue potential for protein structures, with testing by Monte Carlo simulated annealing

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 152-169

  Mayewski, Stefan ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multibody potentials; Packing motifs; Simulated annealing; Statistical potentials; Structural motifs; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

CARBON; PROTEIN;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; ENERGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEINS;

EID: 16344396587     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20397     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Gibson KD, Scheraga HA. Minimization of polypeptide energy: I. Preliminary structures of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease S-peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1967;58:420-427.
2. Hagler AT, Huler E, Lifson S. Energy functions for peptides and proteins: I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals. J Amer Chem Soc 1974;96:5319-5327.
3. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
4. Smith JC, Karplus M. Empirical force field studies of geometries and conformational transitions of some organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1992;114:801-812.
5. Nemethy G, Gibson KD, Palmer KA, Yoon CN, Paterlini G, Zagari A, Rumsey S, Scheraga HA. Energy parameters in polypeptides: 10 improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with applications to proline-containing peptides. J Phys Chem 1992;96:6472-6484.
6. Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 2001;7:306-317.
7. Duan Y, Kollman PA. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998;282:740-744.
8. Ferrara P, Caflisch A. Folding simulations of a three-stranded antiparallel β-sheet peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10780-10785.
9. Cavalli A, Ferrara P, Caflisch A. Weak temperature dependence of the free energy surface and folding pathways of structured peptides. Proteins 2002;47:305-314.
10. Shen M, Freed KF. All-atom fast protein simulations: the villin headpiece. Proteins 2002;49:439-445.
11. Snow CD, Nguyen H, Pande VS, Gruebele M. Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature 420:102-106.
12. Bujnicki JM, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. LiveBench-2: Large-scale automated evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:184-191.
13. Taylor WR, Jonassen I. A structural pattern-based method for protein fold recognition. Proteins 2004;56:222-234.
14. Bonneau R, Strauss CEM, Rohl CA, Chivian D, Bradley P, Malmström L, Robertson T, Baker D. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J Mol Biol 2002;322:65-78.
15. Moult J, Unger R. The significance of performance ranking in CASP. Structure 2002;10:291-293.
16. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromol 1976;9:945-950.
17. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
18. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favourable contact pair term and an unfavourable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
19. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
20. Kolinski A, Godzik A, Skolnick J. A general method for the prediction of the three-dimensional structure and folding pathway of globular proteins: application to designed helical proteins. J Chem Phys 1993;98:7420-7433.
21. Liwo A, Kazmierkiewicz R, Czaplewski C, Groth M, Oldziej S, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Pincus MR, Scheraga HA. United-residue force field for off-lattice protein structure simulations: III. Origin of backbone hydrogen-bonding cooperativity in united-residue potentials. J Comput Chem 1998;19:259-276.
22. Jones DT. Successful ab initio prediction of the tertiary structure of NK-Lysin using multiple sequences and recognized supersecondary structural motifs. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:185-191.
23. Gan HH, Tropsha A, Schlick T. Lattice protein folding with two and four-body statistical potentials. Proteins 2001;43:161-174.
24. Betancourt MR. A reduced protein model with accurate native structure identification ability. Proteins 2003;53:889-907.
25. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 1999;8:361-369.
26. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;109:11101-11108.
27. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Can pairwise contact potentials stabilize native protein against decoys obtained by threading? Proteins 2000;38:134-148.
28. Carter CW Jr, LeFebvre BC, Cammer SA, Tropsha A, Edgell MH. Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations. J Mol Biol 2001;311:625-638.
29. Fernandez A. Conformation-dependent environments in folding proteins. J Chem Phys 2001;114:2489-2502.
30. Khatun J, Sagar DK, Dokholyan NV. Can contact potentials reliably predict stability of proteins? J Mol Biol 2004;336:1223-1238.
31. Unger R, Harel D, Wherland S, Sussman JL. A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. Proteins 1989;5:355-373.
32. Suchhardt J, Schneider G, Reichelt J, Schomburg D, Wrede P. Local structure motifs of protein backbones are classified by self-organizing neural networks. Prot Eng 1996;9:833-842.
33. Bystroff C, Baker D. Blind predictions of local protein structure in CASP2 targets using the I-Sites library. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:167-171.
34. Fetrow JS, Palumbo MJ, Berg G. Patterns, structures, and amino acid frequencies in structural building blocks, a protein secondary structure classification scheme. Proteins 1997;27:249-271.
35. Camproux AC, Tuffery P, Chevrolat JP, Boisvieux JF, Hazout S. Hidden Markov model approach for identifying the modular framework of the protein backbone. Prot Eng 1999;12:1063-1073.
36. Deane CM, Blundell TL. A novel exhaustive search algorithm for predicting the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins. Proteins 2000;40:135-144.
37. de Brevern AG, Etchebest C, Hazout S. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 2000;41:271-287.
38. de Brevern AG, Valadie H, Hazout S, Etchebest C. Extension of a local backbone description using a structural alphabet: A new approach to the sequence-structure relationship. Protein Sci 2002;11:2871-2886.
39. Figureau A, Soto MA, Toha J. A pentapeptide-based method for protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng 2003;16:103-108.
40. Rooman MJ, Rodriguez J, Wodak SJ. Automatic definition of recurrent local structure motif in proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:327-336.
41. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Discretized model of proteins: I. Monte Carlo study of cooperativity in homopolypeptides. J Chem Phys 1992;97:9412-9426.
42. Fernandez A, Sosnick TR, Colubri A. Dynamics of hydrogen bond desolvation in protein folding. J Mol Biol 2002;321:659-675.
43. Munson PJ, Singh RJ. Statistical significance of hierarchical multibody potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci 1997;6:1467-1481.
44. Singh RK, Tropsha A, Vaisman I. Delaunay tessellation of proteins: Four-body nearest neighbour propensities of amino acids. J Comput Biol 1996;3:213-221.
45. Karlin S, Zhu Z. Characterization of diverse residue clusters in protein three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:8344-8349.
46. Zhu Z, Karlin S. Clusters of charged residues in protein three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:8350-8355.
47. Jonassen I, Eidhammer I, Taylor WR. Discovery of local packing motifs in protein structures. Proteins 1999;34:206-219.
48. Jonassen I, Eidhammer I, Conklin D, Taylor WR. Structure motif discovery and mining the PDB. Bioinformatics 2002;18:362-367.
49. Herringa J, Argos P. Side-chain clusters in protein structures and their role in protein folding. J Mol Biol 1991;220:151-171.
50. Bagci Z, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, Bahar I. The origin and extent of coarse-grained regularities in protein internal packing. Proteins 2003;53:56-67.
51. Chothia C. Principles that determine the structure of proteins. Ann Rev Biochem 1984;53:537-572.
52. Cohen FE, Sternberg MJE, Taylor WR. Analysis and prediction of the packing of alpha-helices against a beta-sheet in the tertiary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1982;156:821-862.
53. Cohen FE, Sternberg MJE, Taylor WR. Analysis of the tertiary structure of protein beta-sheet sandwiches. J Mol Biol 1981;148:253-277.
54. Murzin A. Structural principles for the propeller assembly of beta-sheets: the preference for seven-fold symmetry. Proteins 1992;14:191-201.
55. Chothia C, Janin J. Orthogonal packing of beta-pleated sheets in proteins. Biochem 1982;21:3955-3965.
56. Dunbrack R. A protein sequence culling server. 2004. Available online at http://www.fccc.edu/research/labs/dunbrack/culledpd-b.html
57. McClachlan AD. Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin. J Mol Biol 1979;128:49-79.
58. Zhu Z, Blundell TL. The use of amino acid patterns of classified helices and strands in secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1996;260:261-276.
59. Hutchinson E, Thornton JM. A revised set of potentials for beta-turn formation in protein. Prot Sci 1994;3:2207-2216.
60. Chou PY, Fasman GD. Beta-turns in proteins. J Mol Biol 1977;115:135-175.
61. Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. Science 1988;240:1648-1652.
62. Cohen C, Parry DAD. Alpha-helical coiled coils and bundles: how to design an alpha-helical protein. Proteins 1990;7:1-15.
63. Lupas A, van Dyke M, Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 1991;252:1162-1164.
64. Paliakasis CD, Kokkinidis M. Relationships between sequence and structure for the four-alpha-helix bundle tertiary motif in proteins. Protein Eng 1992;5:739-748.
65. Woolfson DN, Alber T. Predicting oligomerization states of coiled coils. Protein Sci 1995;4:1596-1607.
66. Kortemme T, Ramirez-Alvarado M, Serrano L. Design of a 20-amino acid, three-stranded beta-sheet protein. Science 1998;281:253-256.
67. de Alba E, Santoro J, Rico M, Jimenez MA. De novo design of a monomeric three-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet. Protein Sci 1999;8:854-865.
68. Griffiths-Jones SR, Searle MS. Structure, folding, and energetics of cooperative interactions between the beta-strands of a de novo designed three-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet peptide. J Amer Chem Soc 2000;122:8350-8356.
69. Sicheri F, Yang DSC. Ice-binding structure and mechanism of an antifreeze protein from winter flounder. Nature 1995;375:427-431.
70. Fezoui Y, Connolly PJ, Osterhout JJ. Solution structure of alpha-T-alpha, a helical hairpin peptide of de novo design. Protein Sci 1997;6:1869-1877.
71. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller EJ. Equation of state calculation by fast computing machines. Chem Phys 1952;21:1087-1092.
72. Wintjens RT, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Automatic classification and analysis of alpha-alpha-turn motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol 1996;255:235-253.
73. Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Are database-derived potentials valid for coring forward and inverted protein folding? Protein Eng 1995;8:849-858.
74. Thomas PD, Dill KA. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? J Mol Biol 1996;257:457-469.
75. Ben-Naim A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: Are these meaningful potentials? J Chem Phys 1997;107:3698-3706.
76. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
77. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002;11:2714-2726.
78. Liwo A, Arlukowicz P, Czaplewski C, Oldziej S, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. A method for optimizing potential-energy functions by a hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape: application to the UNRES force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:1937-1942.
79. Avbelj F, Fele L. Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of proteins using the electrostatic screening model and hierarchic condensation. Proteins 1998;31:74-96.
80. Nishikawa K, Ooi T. Prediction of the surface-interior diagram of globular proteins by an empirical method. Int J Protein Peptide Res 1980;16:19-32.
81. Sowdhamini R, Srinivasan N, Shoichet B, Santi DV, Ramakrishnan C, Balaram P. Stereochemical modelling of disulfide bridges: criteria for introduction into proteins by site-directed mutagenesis. Prot Eng 1989;3:95-103.
82. Warme PK, Morgan RS. A survey of amino acid side-chain interactions in 21 proteins. J Mol Biol 1978;118:289-304.