The genetics of speciation: Genes of small effect underlie sexual isolation in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1110-1119

  Ellison, C K ^a   Wiley, C ^a   Shaw, K L ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Effect size; Introgression; Quantitative trait loci; Sexual communication; Stabilizing selection

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; CRICKET; DIVERGENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; INTROGRESSION; PHENOTYPE; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNAL; SONG; TAXONOMY;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ALLELES; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOTYPE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

LAUPALA; LAUPALA KOHALENSIS; LAUPALA PARANIGRA;

EID: 79955027581     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02244.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Barnwell, C.V. & Noor, M.A.F. 2008. Failure to replicate two mate preference QTLs across multiple stains of Drosophila pseudoobscura. J. Hered. 99: 653-656.
2. Barton, N.H. 1986. The maintenance of polygenic variation through a balance between mutation and stabilizing selection. Genet. Res. 47: 209-216.
3. Barton, N.H. & Keightley, P.D. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 11-21.
4. Bouchez, A., Hospital, F., Causse, M., Gallais, A. & Charcosset, A. 2002. Marker assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines. Genetics 162: 1945-1959.
5. Brooks, R., Hunt, J., Blows, M.W., Smith, M.J., Bussiere, L.F. & Jennions, M.D. 2005. Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection. Evolution 59: 871-880.
6. Buckler, E.S., Holland, J.B., Bradbury, P.J., Acharya, C.B., Brown, P.J., Browne, C. et al. 2009. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325: 714-718.
7. Butlin, R.K. & Ritchie, M.G. 1989. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37: 237-246.
8. Civetta, A. & Cantor, E.J.F. 2003. The genetics of mating recognition between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genet. Res. 82: 117-126.
9. Coyne, J.A. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355: 511-515.
10. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
11. Dopman, E.B., Perez, L., Bogcanowicz, S.M. & Harrison, R.G. 2005. Consequences of reproductive barriers for genealogical discordance in the European corn borer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 14706-14711.
12. Etges, W.J., de Oliveira, C.C., Gragg, E., Ortíz-Barrientos, D., Noor, M.A.F. & Ritchie, M.G. 2007. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis: I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype × environment interactions. Evolution 61: 1106-1119.
13. Etges, W.J., de Oliveira, C.C., Ritchie, M.G. & Noor, M.A.F. 2009. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis: II. Host plants and mating status influence cuticular hydrocarbon QTL expression and G × E interactions. Evolution 63: 1712-1730.
14. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford, England.
15. Frisch, M. & Melchinger, A.E. 2005. Selection theory for marker-assisted backcrossing. Genetics 170: 909-917.
16. Gerhardt, H.C. & Brooks, R. 2009. Experimental analysis of multivariate female choice in gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): evidence for directional and stabilizing selection. Evolution 63: 2504-2512.
17. Gerhardt, H.C. & Huber, F. 2002. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
18. Glazier, A.M., Nadeau, J.H. & Aitman, T.J. 2002. Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science 298: 2345-2349.
19. Gleason, J.M. & Ritchie, M.G. 1998. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni species complex: do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52: 1493-1500.
20. Gleason, J.M. & Ritchie, M.G. 2004. Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with c&idate genes & intraspecific QTL? Genetics 166: 1303-1311.
21. Gleason, J.M., Nuzhdin, S.V. & Ritchie, M.G. 2002. Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 89: 1-6.
22. Gleason, J.M., Jallon, J.M., Rouault, J.K. & Ritchie, M.G. 2005. Quantitative trait loci for cuticular hydrocarbons associated with sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 171: 1789-1798.
23. Gleason, J.M., James, R.A., Wicker-Thomas, C. & Ritchie, M.G. 2009. Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females. Heredity 103: 416-424.
24. Gould, F., Estock, M., Hillier, N.K., Powell, B., Groot, A.T., Ward, C.M. et al. 2010. Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107: 8660-8665.
25. Groot, A.T., Horovitz, J.L., Hamilton, J., Santangelo, R.J., Schal, C. & Gould, F. 2006. Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103: 5858-5863.
26. Hospital, F. 2005. Selection in backcross programmes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360: 1503-1511.
27. Hospital, F., Moreau, L., Lacoudre, F., Charcosset, A. & Gallais, A. 1997. More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 1181-1189.
28. Hunt, J., Blows, M.W., Zajitschek, F., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2007. Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Genetics 177: 875-880.
29. Huttunen, S., Aspi, J., Hoikkala, A. & Schlotterer, C. 2004. QTL analysis of variation in male courtship song characters in Drosophila virilis. Heredity 92: 263-269.
30. Johnson, T. & Barton, N. 2005. Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360: 1411-1425.
31. Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
32. Klappert, K., Butlin, R.K. & Reinhold, K. 2007. The attractiveness fragment - AFLP analysis of local adaptation and sexual selection in a caeliferan grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. Naturwissenschaften 94: 667-674.
33. Kondrashov, A.S. & Turelli, M. 1992. Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics 132: 603-618.
34. Lande, R. 1975. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet. Res. 26: 221-235.
35. Laurie, C.C., True, J.R., Liu, J. & Mercer, J.M. 1997. An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 145: 339-348.
36. Mackay, T.F.C. 2009. The genetic architecture of complex behaviors: lessons from Drosophila. Genetica 136: 295-302.
37. Martin, N.H., Sapir, Y. & Arnold, M.L. 2008. The genetic architecture of reproductive isolation in Louisiana irises: pollination syndromes and pollinator preferences. Evolution 62: 740-752.
38. Mendelson, T.C. & Shaw, K.L. 2002. Genetic and behavioral components of the cryptic species boundary between Laupala cerasina and L. kohalensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Genetica 116: 301-310.
39. Mendelson, T.C. & Shaw, K.L. 2005. Rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433: 375-376.
40. Moehring, A.J. & Mackay, T.F.C. 2004. The quantitative genetic basis of male mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167: 1249-1263.
41. Murphy, C.G. & Gerhardt, H.C. 2000. Mating preference functions of individual female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, for two properties of male advertisement calls. Evolution 54: 660-669.
42. Noor, M.A.F. & Feder, J.L. 2007. Speciation genetics: evolving approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 851-861.
43. Orgogozo, V., Broman, K.W. & Stern, D.L. 2006. High-resolution quantitative trait locus mapping reveals sign epistasis controlling ovariole number between two Drosophila species. Genetics 173: 197-205.
44. Orr, H.A. 1998a. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935-949.
45. Orr, H.A. 1998b. Testing natural selection versus genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data. Genetics 149: 2099-2104.
46. Orr, H.A. 1999. The evolutionary genetics of adaptation: a simulation study. Genet. Res. 74: 207-214.
47. Orr, H.A. 2005. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 119-127.
48. Otte, D. 1989. Speciation in Hawaiian crickets. In: Speciation and Its Consequences (D. Otte & J. Endler, eds), pp. 483-526. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
49. Otte, D. 1992. Evolution of cricket songs. J. Othoptera Res. 1: 25-49.
50. Otte, D. 1994. The Crickets of Hawaii: Origin, Systematics and Evolution. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
51. Parsons, Y.M. & Shaw, K.L. 2001. Species boundaries and genetic diversity among Hawaiian crickets of the genus Laupala identified using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1765-1772.
52. Parsons, Y.M. & Shaw, K.L. 2002. Mapping unexplored genomes: a genetic linkage map of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Genetics 162: 1275-1282.
53. Ramsey, J., Bradshaw, H.D. & Schemske, D.W. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57: 1520-1534.
54. Reinhold, K. 2009. Variation of acoustic courtship signals in insects and amphibians: no evidence for bimodality, but identical dependence on duration. Ethology 115: 134-140.
55. Ritchie, M.G. 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93: 14628-14631.
56. Ritchie, M.G. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 79-102.
57. Ritchie, M.G., Saarikettu, M., Livingstone, S. & Hoikkala, A. 2001. Characterization of female preference functions for Drosophila montana courtship song and a test of the temperature coupling hypothesis. Evolution 55: 721-727.
58. Roelofs, W.L., Liu, W.T., Hao, G.X., Jiao, H.M., Rooney, A.P. & Linn, C.E. 2002. Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13621-13626.
59. Ryan, M.J. & Wilczynski, W. 1988. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect of local mate preferences in cricket frogs. Science 240: 1786-1788.
60. Schafer, M.A., Mazzi, D., Klappert, K., Kauranen, H., Vieira, J., Hoikkala, A. et al. 2010. A microsatellite linkage map for Drosophila montana shows large variation in recombination rates, and a courtship song trait maps to an area of low recombination. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 518-527.
61. Shaw, K.L. 1996. Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution 50: 256-266.
62. Shaw, K.L. 1999. A nested analysis of song groups and species boundaries in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 332-341.
63. Shaw, K.L. 2000. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54: 1303-1312.
64. Shaw, K.L. 2002. Conflict between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mitochondrial DNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16122-16127.
65. Shaw, K.L. & Herlihy, D. 2000. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 267: 577-584.
66. Shaw, K.L. & Lesnick, S.C. 2009. Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 9737-9742.
67. Shaw, K.L. & Parsons, Y.M. 2002. Divergence of mate recognition behavior and its consequences for genetic architectures of speciation. Am. Nat. 159: S61-S75.
68. Shaw, K.L., Parsons, Y.M. & Lesnick, S.C. 2007. QTL analysis of a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Mol. Ecol. 16: 2879-2892.
69. Templeton, A.R. 1981. Mechanisms of speciation - a population genetic approach. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 23-48.
70. Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.
71. Turelli, M. & Barton, N.H. 2004. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects, and G × E interactions. Genetics 166: 1053-1079.
72. Velthuis, B.J., Yang, W.C., van Opijnen, T. & Werren, J.H. 2005. Genetics of female mate discrimination of heterospecific males in Nasonia (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). Animal Behav. 69: 1107-1120.
73. Wagner, W.E. 1998. Measuring female mate preferences. Animal Behav. 55: 1029-1042.
74. Wang, H.-L., Ming, Q.-L., Zhao, C.-H. & Wang, C.Z. 2008. Genetic basis of sex pheromone blend difference between Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Insect Physiol. 54: 813-817.
75. Wiley, C. & Shaw, K.L. 2010. Multiple genetic linkages between female preference and male signal in rapidly speciating Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 64: 2238-2245.
76. Williams, M.A., Blouin, A.G. & Noor, M.A.F. 2001. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis II. Genetics of species differences. Heredity 86: 68-77.
77. Yeh, S.-D., Liou, S.-R. & True, J.R. 2006. Genetics of divergence in male wing pigmentation and courtship behavior between Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola. Heredity 96: 383-395.
78. Zhang, X.-S. & Hill, W.G. 2003. Multivariate stabilizing selection & pleiotropy in the maintenance of quantitative genetic variation. Evolution 57: 1761-1775.