Multiple genetic linkages between female preference and male signal in rapidly speciating hawaiian crickets

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2238-2245

  Wiley, Chris ^a   Shaw, Kerry L ^a  

^a Mudd Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Courtship; Genetic correlation; Laupala; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; COEVOLUTION; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; COURTSHIP; CRICKET; DIVERGENCE; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; GENETIC STRUCTURE; PLEIOTROPY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RELATEDNESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GRYLLIDAE; INBREEDING; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; UNITED STATES;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOTYPE; GRYLLIDAE; HAWAII; INBREEDING; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

GRYLLIDAE; LAUPALA; LAUPALA KOHALENSIS; LAUPALA PARANIGRA;

EID: 77955256816     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01007.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alexander R D. Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution 1962, 16:443-467.
2. Bakker T C M, Pomiankowski A. The genetic basis of female mate preference. J. Evol. Biol. 1995, 8:129-171.
3. Barraclough T G, Harvey P H, Nee S. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in Passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1995, 259:211-215.
4. Boake C R B. Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1991, 6:225-227.
5. Bolnick D I, Fitzpatrick B M. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38:459-487.
6. Bush S L, Schul J. Pulse-rate recognition in an insect: evidence for a role of oscillatory neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. A 2006, 192:113-121.
7. Butlin R, Ritchie M G. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1989, 37:237-246.
8. Danley P D, deCarvalho T N, Fergus D J, Shaw K L. Reproductive asynchrony and the divergence of Hawaiian crickets. Ethology 2007, 113:1125-1132.
9. Fisher R A. The genetical theory of natural selection 1930, Clarendon Press, Oxford
10. Fukamachi S, Kinoshita M, Aizawa K, Oda S, Meyer A, Mitani H. Dual control by a single gene of secondary sexual characters and mating preferences in Medaka. BMC Biol. 2009, 7:64-73.
11. Gray D A, Cade W H. Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Evolution 1999, 53:848-854.
12. Gray D A, Cade W H. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:14449-14454.
13. Hamilton W D, Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?. Science 1982, 218:384-387.
14. Hedwig B. Control of cricket stridulation by a command neuron: efficacy depends on the behavioral state. J. Neurophysiol. 2000, 83:712-722.
15. Hoy R R. Genetic control of acoustic behavior in crickets. Am. Zool. 1974, 14:1067-1080.
16. Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions M D. Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history strategy. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:79-92.
17. Hurst L D, Pál C, Lercher M J. The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order. Nat. Rev. 2004, 5:299-310.
18. Jones A G, Ratterman N L. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:10001-10008.
19. Kirkpatrick M, Hall D W. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 2004, 58:683-691.
20. Kronforst M R, Young L G, Kapan D D, McNeely C, O'Neill R J, Gilbert L E. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:6575-6580.
21. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78:3721-3725.
22. Manichaikul A, Dupuis J, Sen A̧, Broman K. Poor performance of bootstrap confidence intervals for the location of a quantitative trait locus. Genetics 2006, 174:481-489.
23. Marcillac F, Grosjean Y, Ferveur J-F. A single mutation alters production and discrimination of Drosophila sex pheromones. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2005, 272:303-309.
24. Mead L S, Arnold S J. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:264-271.
25. Mendelson T C. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 2003, 57:317-327.
26. Mendelson T C, Shaw K L. Genetic and behavioral components of the cryptic species boundary between Laupala cerasina and L. kohalensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Genetica 2002, 116:301-310.
27. Mendelson T C, Shaw K L. Sexual behaviour: rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 2005, 433:375-376.
28. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Reiland J, Hey J, Noor M A F. Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species. Genetic 2002, 116:167-178.
29. Otte D. The crickets of Hawaii: origin, systematics and evolution 1994, Orthopterists' Society, Philadelphia, PA
30. Panhuis T M, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:364-371.
31. Pires A, Hoy R R. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. J. Comp. Phys. 1992, 171:79-92.
32. Protas M, Tabansky I, Conrad M, Gross J B, Vidal O, Tabin C J, Borowsky R. Multi-trait evolution in a cave fish. Evol. Dev. 2008, 10:196-209.
33. Qvarnström A, Brommer J E, Gustafsson L. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 2006, 441:84-86.
34. Ritchie M G. The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:327-332.
35. Ritchie M G. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38:79-102.
36. Servedio M R, Sæther S A, Sætre G-P. Reinforcement and learning. Evol. Ecol. 2009, 23:109-123.
37. Shaw K L. Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution 1996, 50:256-266.
38. Shaw K L. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 2000, 54:1303-1312.
39. Shaw K L. Conflict between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mitochondrial DNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:16122-16127.
40. Shaw K L, Herlihy D P. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:577-584.
41. Shaw K L, Lesnick S C. Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:9737-9742.
42. Shaw K L, Parsons Y M, Lesnick S C. QTL analysis of a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:2879-2892.
43. Smith R J. Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2009, 140:476-486.
44. Verzijden M N, Lachlan R F, Servedio M R. Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution 2005, 59:2097-2108.
45. Wagner W E. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim. Behav. 1998, 55:1029-1042.
46. Xu Z, Kohel R J, Song G, Cho J, Alabady M, Yu J, Koo P, Chu J, Yu S, Wilkins T A. Gene-rich islands for fiber development in the cotton genome. Genomics 2008, 92:173-183.