A Nested Analysis of Song Groups and Species Boundaries in the Hawaiian Cricket GenusLaupala

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 332-341

  Shaw, Kerry L ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; GRYLLIDAE; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS, POPULATION; GRYLLIDAE; HAPLOTYPES; HAWAII; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033091215     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0558     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alexander R. D. Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution. 16:1962;443-467.
2. Arnold M. L. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. 1997;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
3. Baum, D. A. Shaw, K. L. 1995, Genealogical perspectives on the species problem, In, Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics, Systematic Monographs of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 53, 289, 303, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO.
4. Brantley R. K., Bass A. H. Alternative male spawning tactics and acoustic signaling in the plainfin midshipman fish,Porichthys notatus. Ethology. 96:1994;213-232.
5. Doherty J. A., Callos J. D. Acoustic communication in the trilling field cricket,Gryllus rubens. J. Insect Behav. 4:1991;67-82.
6. Doherty J. A., Howard K. J. Lack of preference for conspecific calling song in female crickets. Anim. Behav. 51:1996;981-990.
7. Doherty J. A., Storz M. M. Calling song and selective phonotaxis in the field crickets,Gryllus firmusGryllus pennsylvanicus. J. Insect Behav. 5:1992;555-569.
8. Ewing A. W. Arthropod Bioacoustics: Neurobiology and Behavior. 1989;Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca.
9. Fulton B. B. Inheritance of song in hybrids of two subspecies ofNemobius fasciatus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 26:1933;368-376.
10. Harvey P. H., Pagel M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. 1991;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
11. Hauser M. D. The Evolution of Communication. 1996;The MIT Press, Cambridge.
12. Higgins D. G., Bleasby A. J., Fuchs R. Clustal V: Improvised software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:1992;189-191.
13. Hoy R. R. Genetic control of acoustic behavior in crickets. Amer. Zool. 14:1974;1067-1080.
14. Hoy R. R., Hahn J., Paul R. C. Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: Evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science. 195:1977;82-84.
15. Hoy R. R., Paul R. C. Genetic control of song specificity in crickets. Science. 180:1973;82-83.
16. Mayr E. Animal Species and Evolution. 1963;Belknap Press, Cambridge.
17. Otte D. Evolution of cricket songs. J. Orth. Res. 1:1992;25-49.
18. Otte D. Speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Otte D., Endler J. A. Speciation and Its Consequences. 1989;482-526 Sinauer, Sunderland.
19. Otte D. Orthoptera Species File. 1. Crickets (Grylloidea). 1994a;Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
20. Otte D. The Crickets of Hawaii: Origin, Systematics and Evolution. 1994b;Academy of Natural SciencesThe Orthopterists' Society, Philadelphia.
21. Otte D., Alexander R. D. The Australian crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. Monogr. 22:1983;1-477.
22. Otte D., Cade W. H. African crickets (Gryllidae). 6. The genusGryllus. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 136:1984;45-122.
23. Patton J. L., Smith M. F. Paraphyly, polyphyly, and the nature of species boundaries in pocket gophers (genusThomomys. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;11-26.
24. Perkins R. C. L. Orthoptera. Sharp D. Fauna Hawaiiensis or the Zoology of the Sandwich (Hawaiian) Isles. 1899;1-30 Cambridge Univ. Press, London.
25. Shaw K. L. Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: Interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genusLaupala. Evolution. 50:1996a;256-266.
26. Shaw K. L. Sequential radiations and patterns of speciation in the Hawaiian cricket genusLaupala, Evolution. 50:1996b;237-255.
27. Stout J. F., DeHaan C. H., McGhee R. W. Attractiveness of the maleAcheta domestica. J. Comp. Physiol. 153:1983;509-521.
28. Stout J. F., McGhee R. Attractiveness of the maleAcheta domestica. J. Comp. Physiol. 164:1988;277-287.
29. Swofford, D. L. 1990, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
30. Templeton A. R., Boerwinkle E., Sing C. F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase activity inDrosophila. Genetics. 117:1987;343-351.
31. Templeton A. R., Crandall K. A., Sing C. F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics. 132:1993;619-633.
32. Templeton A. R., Routman E., Phillips C. A. Separating population structure from population history: A cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the tiger salamander,Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics. 140:1995;767-782.
33. Walker T. J. Specificity in the response of female tree crickets (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Oecanthinae) to calling songs of the males. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 50:1957;620-636.
34. Walker T. J. Cryptic species among sound-producing ensiferan Orthoptera (Gryllidae and Tettigoniidae). Quart. Rev. Biol. 39:1964;345-355.
35. Walker T. J. Character displacement and acoustic insects. Amer. Zool. 14:1974;1137-1150.