Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the drosophila willistoni species complex: Do sexual signals diverge the most quickly?

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1493-1500

  Gleason, Jennifer M ^a   Ritchie, Michael G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Courtship song; Drosophila; Genetic distance; Postmating isolation; Sexual isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT; COURTSHIP; EVOLUTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SONG;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA WILLISTONI; DROSOPHILIDAE; INVERTEBRATA; WILLISTONI GROUP;

EID: 0031790778     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02031.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ALONSO-PIMENTEL, H., H. G. SPANGLER, AND W. B. HEED. 1995. Courtship sounds and behaviour of the two saguaro-breeding Drosophila and their relatives. Anim. Behav. 50:1031-1039.
2. ANDERSSON, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. BARRACLOUGH, T. G., P. H. HARVEY, AND S. NEE. 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 259:211-215.
4. BENNET-CLARK, H. C., AND A. W. EWING. 1967. Stimuli provided by courtship of male Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 215:669-671.
5. BENNET-CLARK, H. C., AND A. W. EWING. 1969. Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 17:755-759.
6. BURLA, H., A. B. DA CUNHA, A. R. CORDEIRO, T. DOBZHANSKY, C. MALOGOLOWKIN, AND C. PAVAN. 1949. The willistoni group of sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 3:300-314.
7. BUTLIN, R. K. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Pp. 158-179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinaur, Sunderland, MA.
8. BUTLIN, R. K., AND M. G. RITCHIE. 1994. Mating behaviour and Speciation. Pp. 43-79 in P. J. B. Slater, and T. R. Halliday, eds. Behaviour and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
9. CARMODY, G. 1965. Two unusual strains of the D. willistoni sibling species group. Drosophila Inf. Serv. 40:53.
10. CARMODY, G., A. DIAZ COLLAZO, T. DOBZHANSKY, L. EHRMAN, I. S. JAFFREY, S. KIMBALL, S. OBREBSKI, S. SILAGI, T. TIDWELL, AND R. ULLRICH. 1962. Mating preferences and sexual isolation within and between the incipient species of Drosophila paulistorum. Am. Nat. 68:67-82.
11. CHANG, H.-C., AND D. D. MILLER. 1978. Courtship and mating sounds in species of the Drosophila affinis subgroup. Evolution 32:540-550.
12. COCROFT, R. B., AND M. J. RYAN. 1995. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim. Behav. 49:283-303.
13. COYNE, J. A., AND H. A. ORR. 1989. Patterns of Speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
14. ". 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
15. DOBZHANSKY, T. 1946. Complete reproductive isolation between two morphologically similar species of Drosophila. Ecology 27: 205-211.
16. ". 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
17. ". 1957. Genetics of Natural Populations. XXVI. Chromosomal variability in islands and continental populations of Drosophila willistoni from Central America and West Indies. Evolution 11:280-293.
18. DOBZHANSKY, T., AND O. PAVLOVSKY. 1975. Unstable intermediates between Orinocan and Interior semispecies of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 29:242-248.
19. DOBZHANSKY, T., L. EHRMAN, AND O. PAVLOVSKY. 1957. Genetics of Drosophila IX. Drosophila insularis, a new sibling species of the willistoni group. Univ. Tex. Publ. 5721:39-47.
20. EHRMAN, L. 1965. Direct observation of sexual isolation between allopatric and between sympatric strains of the different Drosophila paulistorum races. Evolution 19:459-464.
21. EHRMAN, L., AND C. PETIT. 1968. Genotype frequency and mating success in the willistoni species group of Drosophila. Evolution 22:649-658.
22. EHRMAN, L., AND J. R. POWELL. 1982. The Drosophila willistoni species group. Pp. 193-225 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson Jr, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, New York.
23. ENDLER, J. A. 1980. Natural selection on colour patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76-91.
24. ". 1992. Signals, signal conditions and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139:s125-153.
25. ENDLER, J. A., AND A. E. HOUDE. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
26. ETGES, W. J. 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophillic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46: 1945-1950.
27. EWING, A. W., AND J. A. MIYAN. 1986. Sexual selection, sexual isolation and the evolution of song in the Drosophila repleta group of species. Anim. Behav. 34:421-429.
28. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1995. PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package. Vers. 3.57c. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
29. GILBERT, D. G., AND W. T. STARMER. 1985. Statistics of sexual isolation. Evolution 39:1380-1383.
30. GLEASON, J. M. 1996. Molecular evolution of the period locus and evolution of courtship song in the Drosophila willistoni sibling species. Ph.D. diss., Yale University, New Haven, CT.
31. GLEASON, J. M., AND J. R. POWELL. 1997. Interspecific and intra-specific variation in the period locus in the Drosophila willistoni group. Mol. Bio. Evol. 14:741-753.
32. GLEASON, J. M., E. C. GRIFFITH, AND J. R. POWELL. 1998. A molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila willistoni group: conflicts between species concepts? Evolution 52:1093-1103.
33. GRIFFITH, E. C., AND J. R. POWELL. 1997. Adh nucleotide variation in Drosophila willistoni: high replacement polymorphism in an electrophoretically monomorphic protein. J. Mol. Evol. 45:232-237.
34. HARRISON, R. G., AND S. M. BOGDANOWICZ. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of North American field crickets: perspectives on the evolution of life cycles, songs and habitat associations. J. Evol. Biol. 8:209-232.
35. HENRY, C. S. 1994. Singing and cryptic speciation in insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:388-392.
36. KANESHIRO, K. Y., AND C. R. B. BOAKE. 1987. Sexual selection and speciation: issues raised by Hawaiian Drosophila. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:207-212.
37. KUSMIERSKI, R., G. BORGIA, A. UY, AND R. H. CROSIER. 1997. Labile evolution of display traits in bowerbirds indicates reduced effects of phylogenetic constraint. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 264:307-313.
38. LANDE, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223.
39. LEE, P. L. M., D. H. CLAYTON, R. GRIFFITHS, AND R. D. M. PAGE. 1996. Does behavior reflect phylogeny in swiftlets (Aves: Apodidae)? A test using cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7091-7096.
40. LIOU, L. W., AND T. D. PRICE. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
41. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. 3.04. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
42. MALOGOLOWKIN-COHEN, C., A. S. SIMMONS, AND H. LEVENE. 1965. A study of sexual isolation between certain strains fo Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 19:95-103.
43. MAYR, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
44. NOOR, M. A. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675.
45. ". 1997. How often does sympatry affect sexual isolation in Drosophila? Am. Nat. 149:1156-1163.
46. PATERSON, H. E. H. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
47. PRICE, T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353:251-260.
48. RICE, W. R., AND B. HOLLAND. 1997. The enemies within: inter-genomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41:1-10.
49. RITCHIE, M. G., AND J. M. GLEASON. 1995. Rapid evolution of courtship song pattern in Drosophila willistoni sibling species. J. Evol. Biol. 8:463-479.
50. RITCHIE, M. G., AND S. D. F. PHILLIPS. 1998. The genetics of sexual isolation. Pp. 291-308 in D. Howard and S. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
51. RITCHIE, M. G., R. M. TOWNHILL, AND A. HOIKKALA. 1998. Female preference for fly song: playbacks confirm correlational evidence of the targets of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56:In press.
52. RYAN, M. J. 1990. Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:157-195.
53. RYAN, M. J., AND A. S. RAND. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
54. ". 1995. Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in Túngara frogs. Science 269:390-392.
55. RYAN, M. J., A. S. RAND, AND L. A. WEIGT. 1996. Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the Túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution 50:2435-2453.
56. SæETRE, G.-P, T. MOUM, S. BURES, M. KRÁL, M. ADAMJAN, AND J. MORENO. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589-592.
57. SPASSKY, B., R. C. RICHMOND, S. PEREZ-SALAS, O. PAVLOVSKY, C. A. MOURAO, A. S. HUNTER, H. HOENIGSBERG, T. DOBZHANSKY, AND F. J. AYALA. 1971. Geography of the sibling species related to Drosophila willistoni and of the semispecies of the Drosophila paulistorum complex. Evolution 25:129-143.
58. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: phylogentic analysis using parsimony. Vers. 3.11. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
59. TILLEY, S. G., P. A. VERREL, AND S. J. ARNOLD. 1990. Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2715-2719.
60. TOMARU, M., AND Y. OGUMA. 1994. Genetic basis and evolution of species-specific courtship song in the Drosophila auraria complex. Genet, Res. Camb. 63:11-17.
61. TRUE, J. R., B. S. WEIR, AND C. C. LAURIE. 1996. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142:819-837.
62. WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.
63. WU, C. I., N. A. JOHNSON, AND M. F. PALOPOLI. 1996. Haldane's rule and its legacy: why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:281-284.