Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data

Genetics

Volumn 149, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 2099-2104

  Orr, H Allen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; EVOLUTION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DRIFT; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; GENE FREQUENCY; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS); ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0031927739     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. COYNE, J. A., 1996 Genetics of a difference in male cuticular hydrocarbons between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 143: 1689-1698.
2. EBERHARD, W. G., 1985 Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. EDWARDS, M. D., C. W. STUBER and J. F. WENDEL, 1987 Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116: 113-125.
4. EDWARDS, M. D., T. HELENTJARIS, S. WRIGHT and C. W. STUBER, 1992 Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 765-774.
5. HENDRICKS, W. A., 1956 The Mathematical Theory of Sampling. The Scarecrow Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
6. LANDE, R., 1976 Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314-334.
7. LANDE, R., 1977 Statistical tests for natural selection on quantitative characters. Evolution 31: 442-444.
8. LAURIE, C. C., J. R. TRUE, J. LIU and J. M. MERCER, 1997 An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulons and D. mauritiana. Genetics 145: 339-348.
9. LINDGREN, B. W., 1976 Statistical Theory. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.
10. LYNCH, M., and W. G. HILL, 1986 Phenotypic evolution by neutral mutation. Evolution 40: 915-935.
11. PATERSON, A. H., S. DAMON, J. D. HEWITT, D. ZAMIR, H. D. RABINOWITCH et al., 1991 Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in the tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics 127: 181-197.
12. TANKSLEY, S. D., 1993 Mapping polygenes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27: 205-233.
13. TRUE, J. R., J. LIU, L. F. STAM, Z.-B. ZENG and C. C. LAURIE, 1997 Quantitative genetic analysis of divergence in male secondary sexual traits between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Evolution 51: 816-832.
14. WRIGHT, S., 1968 Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15. ZENG, Z.-B., 1992 Correcting the bias of Wright's estimates of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. Genetics 131: 987-1001.