Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 871-880

  Brooks, Robert ^a   Hunt, John ^a,d   Blows, Mark W ^b   Smith, Michael J ^a,e   Bussière, Luc F ^a,f   Jennions, Michael D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e ARTHUR RYLAH INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adaptive landscape; Call structure; Nonlinear selection; Selection analysis; Selection gradient; Stabilizing selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SEXUAL SELECTION; VOCALIZATION;

TELEOGRYLLUS; TELEOGRYLLUS COMMODUS;

EID: 17844384837     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01760.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Armbruster, W. S. 1990. Estimating and testing the shapes of adaptive surfaces: the morphology and pollination of Dalechampia blossoms. Am. Nat. 135:14-31.
3. Arnold, S. J. 2003. Performance surfaces and adaptive landscapes. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43:367-375.
4. Arnold, S. J., M. E. Pfrender, and A. G. Jones. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macro-evolution. Genetica 112-113:9-32.
5. Barton, N. and P. D. Keightley. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:11-20.
6. Benkman, C. W. 1993. Adaptation to single resources and the evolution of crossbill (Loxia) diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 63:305-325.
7. _. 2003. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Evolution 57:1176-1181.
8. Bentley, D. R., and R. R. Hoy. 1972. Genetic control of the neural network generating cricket (Teleogryllus: Gryllus) song patterns. Anim. Behav. 20:478-492.
9. Bisgaard, S., and B. Ankenman. 1996. Standard errors for the eigenvalues in second-order response surface models. Technometrics 38:238-246.
10. Blows, M. W., and R. Brooks. 2003. Measuring non-linear selection. Am. Nat. 162:815-820.
11. Blows, M. W., R. Brooks, and P. G. Kraft. 2003. Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. Evolution 57:1622-1630.
12. Blows, M. W., S. F. Chenoweth, and E. Hine. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163:329-340.
13. Box, G. E. P., and J. S. Hunter. 1954. A confidence region for the solution of a set of simultaneous equations with an application to experimental design. Biometrika 41:190-199.
14. Brodie, E. D., III,and F. J. Janzen. 1996. On the assignment of fitness values in statistical analyses of selection. Evolution 50:437-442.
15. Bürger, R., and R. Lande. 1994. On the distribution of the mean and the variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 138:901-912.
16. Butlin, R. K., G. M. Hewitt, and S. F. Webb. 1985. Sexual selection for intermediate optimum in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Anim. Behav. 1985:1281-1292.
17. Castellano, S., B. Cuatto, R. Rinella, A. Rosso, and C. Giacoma. 2002. The advertisement call of the European treefrogs (Hyla arborea): a multilevel study of variation. Ethology 108:75-89.
18. Castellano, S., A. Ross, F. Laoretti, S. Doglio, and C. Giacoma. 2000. Call intensity and female preferences in the European green toad. Ethology 106:1129-1141.
19. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110:155-171.
20. Cresswell, J. E. 2000. Manipulation of female architecture in flowers reveals a narrow optimum for pollen deposition. Ecology 81:3244-3249.
21. del Castillo, E., and S. Cahya. 2001. A tool for computing confidence regions on the stationary point of a response surface. Am. Stat. 55:358-365.
22. Draper, N., and H. Smith. 1981. Applied regression analysis. 2nd. ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
23. Dyson, M. L., S. P. Henzi, and N. I. Passmore. 1994. The effect of changes in the relative timing of signals during female phonotaxis in the reed frog Hyperolius marmoratus. Anim. Behav. 48:679-685.
24. Dyson, M. L., and N. I. Passmore. 1988. The combined effect of intensity and the temporal relationship of stimuli on phonotaxis in female painted reed frogs. Anim. Behav. 36:1555-1556.
25. Fear, K. K., and T. Price. 1998. The adaptive surface in ecology. Oikos 82:440-448.
26. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
27. Gerhardt, H. C. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42:615-635.
28. Green, P. J., and B. W. Silverman. 1994. Nonparametric regression and generalised linear models. Chapman and Hall, London.
29. Greenfield, M. D. 2002. Signalers and receivers: mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
30. Greenfield, M. D., and I. Roizen. 1993. Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionary stable outcome of female choice. Nature 364:618-620.
31. Hennig, R. M., and T. Weber. 1997. Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by cricket females of two closely related species: a behavioural analysis. J. Comp. Physiol. A 180:621-630.
32. Hersch, E. I., and P. C. Phillips. 2004. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection. Evolution 58:479-485.
33. Hill, K. G., J. J. Loftus-Hills, and D. F. Gartside. 1972. Pre-mating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gyllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 20:153-163.
34. Holzer, B., A. Jacot, and M. W. G. Brinkhof. 2003. Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behav. Ecol. 353:359.
35. Houde, A. E. 1993. Evolution by sexual selection: What can population comparisons tell us? Am. Nat. 141:796-803.
36. Hunt, J., R. Brooks, M. J. Smith, M. D. Jennions, C. L. Bensten, and L. F. Bussière. 2004. High quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432:1024-1027.
37. Jang, Y., and M. D. Greenfield. 1998. Absolute versus relative measurements of sexual selection: assessing the contributions of ultrasonic signal characters to male attraction in lesser wax moths, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Evolution 52:1383-1393.
38. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
39. Klappert, K., and K. Reinhold. 2003. Acoustic preference functions and sexual selection on the male calling song in the grasshopper Chorthippus biggututlus. Anim. Behav. 65:225-233.
40. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334.
41. _. 1979. Quantitative genetical analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
42. _. 1980. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94:203-215.
43. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
44. Mead, L. S., and S. J. Arnold. 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:264-271.
45. Mitchell-Olds, T., and R. G. Shaw. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149-1161.
46. Murphy, C. G., and H. C. Gerhardt. 2000. Mating preference functions of individual female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, for two properties of male advertisement calls. Evolution 54:660-669.
47. Paterson, H. E. H. 1982. Perspective on speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr. J. Sci. 78:53-57.
48. _. 1985. The recognition concept of species. Pp. 21-29. in E. Vrba, ed. Species and speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
49. Peterson, J. J., S. Cahya, and E. del Castillo. 2002. A general approach to confidence regions for optimal factor levels of response surfaces. Biometrics 58:422-431.
50. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1222.
51. Polakow, D. A., P. R. Y. Backwell, N. Caithness, and M. D. Jennions. 1995. Stabilizing or directional selection in signalling systems: investigations in a population of painted reed frogs, Hyperolius marmoratus. S. Afr. J. Sci. 91:270-273.
52. Ritchie, M. G. 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:14628-14631.
53. Ryan, M. J., and A. Keddy-Hector. 1992. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139:S4-S35.
54. Ryan, M. J., S. A. Perrill, and W. Wilczynski. 1992. Auditory tuning and call frequency predict population-based mating preferences in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. Am. Nat. 139:1370-1383.
55. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 2003. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female Túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals. Evolution 57:2608-2618.
56. Ryan, M. J., and W. Wilczynski. 1988. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preferences in cricket frogs. Science 240:1786-1788.
57. _. 1991. Evolution of intraspecific variation in the advertisement call of a cricket frog (Acris crepitans, Hylidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 44:249-271.
58. Scheuber, H., A. Jacot, and M. W. G. Brinkhof. 2003. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Anim. Behav. 65:721-727.
59. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
60. Simmons, L. W., M. Zuk, and J. T. Rotenberry. 2001. Geographic variation in preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55:1386-1394.
61. Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
62. _. 1953. The major features of evolution. Columbia Univ. Press, Garden City, NY.
63. Sinervo, B. 1998. Adaptation of maternal effects in the wild: path analysis of natural variation and experimental tests of causation. Pp. 288-306 in T. A. Mousseau and C. W. Fox, eds. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
64. Sinervo, B., and A. Basolo. 1996. Testing adaptation using phenotypic manipulation. Pp. 149-185 in M. R. Rose and G. V. Lauder, eds Adaptation. Academic Press, London.
65. Stumpner, A., and D. von Helversen. 2001. Evolution and function of auditory systems in insects. Naturwissenschaften 88:159-170.
66. Travis, J. 1989. The role of optimizing selection in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:279-296.
67. Welch, A. M., R. D. Semlitsch, and H. C. Gerhardt. 1998. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science 280:1928-1930.
68. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:159.
69. Zhang, X.-S., and W. G. Hill. 2003. Multivariate stabilizing selection and pleiotropy in the maintenance of quantitative genetic variation. Evolution 57:1761-1775.
70. Zhang, X.-S., J. Wang, and W. G. Hill. 2002. Pleiotropic model of maintenance of quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance. Genetics 161:419-433.