Genetics of incipient speciation in drosophila mojavensis: II. host plants and mating status influence cuticular hydrocarbon qtl expression and g × e interactions

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1712-1730

  Etges, William J ^a   De Oliveira, Cassia Cardoso ^a   Ritchie, Michael G ^b   Noor, Mohamed A F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Plant insect interaction; Pleiotropy; Quantitative genetics; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

CACTUS; CHROMOSOME; COURTSHIP; CUTICLE; EPISTASIS; FLY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HOST PLANT; HYDROCARBON; MATING SUCCESS; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; PLEIOTROPY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; CACTACEAE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; CACTACEAE; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYDROCARBONS; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

BAJA CALIFORNIA [(STT) MEXICO]; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

AGRIA; CACTACEAE; DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS; HEXAPODA;

EID: 67649416107     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00661.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Basten, C. J., B. S. Weir, and Z.-B. Zeng. 2002. QTL Cartographer: a reference manual and tutorial for QTL mapping. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
2. Bradshaw, H. D., S. M. Wilbert, K. G. Otto, and D. W. Schemske. 1995. Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376 : 762 765.
3. Brazner, J. C., and W. J. Etges. 1993. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of larval substrates on time to copulation, mate choice, and mating propensity. Evol. Ecol. 7 : 605 624.
4. Butlin, R. K., and M. G. Ritchie. 1994. Mating behaviour and speciation. Pp. 43 79 in P. B. J. Slater and T. R. Halliday, eds. Behaviour and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43 : 362 381.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
7. Coyne, J. A., C. Wicker-Thomas, and J.-M. Jallon. 1999. A gene responsible for a cuticular hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. Camb. 73 : 189 203. (Pubitemid 29358610)
8. Cresko, W. A., A. Amores, C. Wilson, J. Murphy, M. Currey, P. Phillips, M. A. Bell, C. B. Kimmel, and J. H. Postlethwait. 2004. Parallel genetic basis for repeated evolution of armor loss in Alaskan threespine stickleback populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 : 6050 6055. (Pubitemid 38520526)
9. Dambroski, H. R., C. Linn, S. Berlocher, A. A. Forbes, W. Roelofs, and J. L. Feder. 2005. The genetic basis for fruit odor discrimination in Rhagoletis flies and its significance for sympatric host shifts. Evolution 59 : 1953 1964. (Pubitemid 41384379)
10. Danielson-Francois, A. M., J. K. Kelly, and M. D. Greenfield. 2006. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. J.Evol. Biol. 19 : 532 542.
11. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
12. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74 : 312 321.
13. Etges, W. J. 1989. Evolution of developmental homeostasis in Drosophila mojavensis. Evol. Ecol. 3 : 189 201. (Pubitemid 20423273)
14. Etges, W. J. 1990. Direction of life history evolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Pp. 37 56 in J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer and R. J. MacIntyre, eds. Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila. Plenum, New York.
15. Etges, W. J. 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46 : 1945 1950.
16. Etges, W. J. 1993. Genetics of host-cactus response and life-history evolution among ancestral and derived populations of cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 47 : 750 767. (Pubitemid 24408829)
17. Etges, W. J. 2002. Divergence in mate choice systems: does evolution play by rules? Genetica 116 : 151 166. (Pubitemid 36108164)
18. Etges, W. J., and M. A. Ahrens. 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations. Am. Nat. 158 : 585 598. (Pubitemid 34001757)
19. Etges, W. J., and W. B. Heed. 1987. Sensitivity to larval density in populations of Drosophila mojavensis: influences of host plant variation on components of fitness. Oecologia 71 : 375 381. (Pubitemid 18288613)
20. Etges, W. J., and L. L. Jackson. 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VI. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation in Drosophila mojavensis cluster species. J. Chem. Ecol. 27 : 2125 2149.
21. Etges, W. J., and C. S. Klassen. 1989. Influences of atmospheric ethanol on adult Drosophila mojavensis: altered metabolic rates and increases in fitness among populations. Physiol. Zool. 62 : 170 193.
22. Etges, W. J., and A. D. Tripodi. 2008. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VIII. Mating success mediated by epicuticular hydrocarbons within and between isolated populations. J. Evol. Biol. 21 : 1641 1652.
23. Etges, W. J., W. R. Johnson, G. A. Duncan, G. Huckins, and W. B. Heed. 1999. Ecological genetics of cactophilic Drosophila. Pp. 164 214 in R. Robichaux, ed. Ecology of Sonoran Desert plants and plant communities. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
24. Etges, W. J., K. F. Over, C. C. de Oliveira, and M. G. Ritchie. 2006. Inheritance of courtship song variation among geographically isolated populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Anim. Behav. 71 : 1205 1214. (Pubitemid 44275089)
25. Etges, W. J., C. C. de Oliveira, E. Gragg, D. Ortíz-Barrientos, M. A. F. Noor, and M. G. Ritchie. 2007. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success and genotype x environment interactions. Evolution 61 : 1106 1119. (Pubitemid 46699444)
26. Feder, J. L., S. B. Opp, B. Wlazlo, K. Reynolds, W. Go, and S. Spisak. 1994. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple magot fly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 : 7990 7994. (Pubitemid 24253871)
27. Feder, J. L., X. Xie, J. Rull, S. Velez, A. Forbes, B. Leung, H. Dambroski, K. E. Filchak, and M. Aluja. 2005. Mayr, Dobzhansky, and Bush and the complexities of sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 6573 6580. (Pubitemid 40628306)
28. Filchak, K. E., W. J. Etges, N. J. Besansky, and J. L. Feder. 2005. Ecological genetics of host use in diptera. Pp. 340 370 in D. K. Yeates and B. M. Wiegman, eds. The evolutionary biology of flies. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
29. Foley, B., S. F. Chenoweth, S. V. Nuzhdin, and M. W. Blows. 2007. Natural genetic variation in cuticular hydrocarbon expression in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 175 : 1465 1477. (Pubitemid 46798245)
30. Funk, D. J. 1998. Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52 : 1744 1759. (Pubitemid 29057175)
31. Funk, D. J., K. E. Filchak, and J. L. Feder. 2002. Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116 : 251 267. (Pubitemid 36108173)
32. Funk, D. J., P. Nosil, and W. J. Etges. 2006. Ecological divergence exhibits consistently positive associations with reproductive isolation across disparate taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 3209 3213. (Pubitemid 43346449)
33. Gastil, R. G., R. P. Phillips, and E. C. Allison. 1975. Reconnaissance geology of the state of Baja California. The Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.
34. Gleason, J. M., and M. G. Ritchie. 2004. Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL? Genetics 166 : 1303 1311. (Pubitemid 38507049)
35. Gleason, J. M., J.-M. Jallon, J.-D. Rouault, and M. G. Ritchie. 2005. Quantitative trait loci for cuticular hydrocarbons associated with sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 171 : 1789 1798.
36. Hawthorne, D. J., and S. Via. 2001. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412 : 904 907. (Pubitemid 32821733)
37. Heed, W. B. 1978. Ecology and genetics of Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Pp. 109 126 in P. F. Brussard, ed. Ecological genetics: the interface. Springer-Verlag, New York.
38. Heed, W. B. 1982. The origin of Drosophila in the Sonoran Desert. Pp. 65 80 in J. S. F. Barker and W. T. Starmer, eds. Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press, Sydney.
39. Heed, W. B., and R. L. Mangan. 1986. Community ecology of the Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Pp. 311 345 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, New York.
40. Hoikkala, A., S. Paallysaho, J. Aspi, and J. Lumme. 2000. Localization of genes affecting species differences in male courtship song between Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis. Genet. Res. Camb. 75 : 37 45. (Pubitemid 30135856)
41. Howard, R. W., and G. J. Blomquist. 2005. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50 : 371 393.
42. Jallon, J. M., and C. Wicker-Thomas. 2003. Genetic studies on pheromone production in Drosophila. Pp. 253 281 in G. J. Blomquist and R. C. Vogt, eds. Insect pheromone biochemistry and molecular biology. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.
43. Jiggins, C. D., R. E. Naisbit, R. L. Coe, and J. Mallet. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411 : 302 305. (Pubitemid 32467034)
44. Kent, C., R. Azanchi, B. Smith, A. Chu, and J. Levine. 2007. A model-based analysis of chemical and temporal patterns of cuticular hydrocarbons in male Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS one 2 : e962.
45. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159 : S22 S35.
46. Knowles, L. L., and T. A. Markow. 2001. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 : 8692 8696. (Pubitemid 32678089)
47. Kronforst, M. R., L. G. Young, D. D. Kapan, C. McNeely, R. J. O'Neill, and L. E. Gilbert. 2006. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 203 : 6575 6580.
48. Krupp, J. J., C. Kent, J.-C. Billeter, R. Azanchi, A. K.-C. So, J. A. Schonfeld, B. P. Smith, C. Lucas, and J. D. Levine. 2008. Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. doi :.
49. Legendre, A., X.-X. Miao, J.-L. Da Lage, and C. Wicker-Thomas. 2008. Evolution of a desaturase involved in female pheromonal cuticular hydrocarbon biosynthesis and courtship behavior in Drosophila. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38 : 244 255.
50. Mackay, T. F. C., and R. R. H. Anholt. 2007. Ain't misbehavin'? Genotype-environment interactions and the genetics of behavior. Trends Genet. 23 : 311 314. (Pubitemid 46962795)
51. Mackay, T. F. C., S. L. Heinsohn, R. F. Lyman, A. J. Moehring, T. J. Morgan, and S. M. Rollmann. 2005. Genetics and genomics of Drosophila mating behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 6622 6629. (Pubitemid 40628313)
52. Mallet, J. 1995. A species definition for the Modern Synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10 : 294 299.
53. Mallet, J., C. D. Jiggins, and W. O. McMillan. 1998. Mimicry and warning colour at the boundary between races and species. Pp. 390 403 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press.
54. Markow, T. A. 1982. Mating systems of cactophilic Drosophila. Pp. 273 287 in J. S. F. Barker and W. T. Starmer, eds. Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press, Sydney.
55. Markow, T. A., and E. C. Toolson. 1990. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. Pp. 315 331 in J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer and R. J. MacIntyre, eds. Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila. Plenum, New York.
56. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
57. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
58. McKinnon, J. S., S. Mori, B. K. Blackman, L. David, D. M. Kingsley, L. Jamieson, J. Chou, and D. Schluter. 2004. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429 : 294 298. (Pubitemid 38691086)
59. Mills, S. C., R. V. Alatalo, E. Koskela, J. Mappes, T. Mappes, and T. A. Oksanen. 2007. Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation. Evolution 61 : 1748 1757. (Pubitemid 47013478)
60. Moehring, A. J., J. Li, M. D. Schug, S. G. Smith, M. deAngelis, T. F. C. Mackay, and J. A. Coyne. 2004. Quantitative trait loci for sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 167 : 1265 1274. (Pubitemid 39045634)
61. Muller, H. J. 1939. Reversibility in evolution from the standpoint of genetics. Biol. Rev. 14 : 261 280.
62. Muller, H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6 : 71 125.
63. Newby, B. D., and W. J. Etges. 1998. Host preference among populations of Drosophila mojavensis that use different host cacti. J. Insect Behav. 11 : 691 712.
64. Nosil, P., and B. J. Crespi. 2006. Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 9090 9095. (Pubitemid 43902538)
65. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417 : 441 443.
66. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., A. S. Chang, and M. A. F. Noor. 2006. A recombinational portrait of the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome. Genet. Res. 87 : 23 31.
67. Palumbi, S. R. 1996. Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. Pp. 205 247 in D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz and B. K. Mable, eds. Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
68. Panhuis, T. M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk, and T. Tregenza. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 364 371. (Pubitemid 32525777)
69. Petfield, D., S. F. Chenoweth, H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows. 2005. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 6045 6050. (Pubitemid 40594252)
70. Polerstock, A. R., S. D. Eigenbrode, and M. J. Klowden. 2002. Mating alters the cuticular hydrocarbons of female Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 39 : 545 552. (Pubitemid 135700292)
71. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43 : 223 225.
72. Rodriguez, R. L., L. M. Sullivan, R. L. Snyder, and R. B. Cocroft. 2008. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence. Evolution 62 : 12 20.
73. Roelofs, W. L., W. Liu, G. Hao, H. Jiao, A. P. Rooney, and C. E. Linn, Jr. 2002. Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 13621 13626. (Pubitemid 35215430)
74. Ruegg, K., H. Slabbekoorn, S. Clegg, and T. B. Smith. 2006. Divergence in mating signals correlates with ecological variation in the migratory songbird, Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Mol. Ecol. 15 : 3147 3156. (Pubitemid 44389296)
75. Ruiz, A., W. B. Heed, and M. Wasserman. 1990. Evolution of the mojavensis cluster of cactophilic Drosophila with descriptions of two new species. J. Hered. 81 : 30 42. (Pubitemid 20182438)
76. Rundle, H. D., and P. Nosil. 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 8 : 336 352. (Pubitemid 40393919)
77. Rundle, H. D., L. Nagel, J. W. Boughman, and D. Schluter. 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287 : 306 308. (Pubitemid 30046757)
78. Rundle, H. D., S. M. Vamosi, and D. Schluter. 2003. Experimental test of predation's effect on divergent selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 : 14943 14948. (Pubitemid 37517996)
79. SAS-Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
80. Schemske, D. W., and H. D. Bradshaw, Jr. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 : 11910 11915. (Pubitemid 29502832)
81. Schluter, D. 1996. Ecological speciation in postglacial fishes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351 : 807 814. (Pubitemid 26309546)
82. Schluter, D., and L. M. Nagel. 1995. Parallel speciation by natural selection. Am. Nat. 146 : 292 301.
83. Shaw, K. L., and P. D. Danley. 2003. Behavioral genomics and the study of speciation at a porous species boundary. Zoology 106 : 261 273. (Pubitemid 38051386)
84. Sheck, A. L., A. T. Groot, C. M. Ward, C. Gemeno, J. Wang, C. Brownie, C. Schal, and F. Gould. 2006. Genetics of sex pheromone blend differences between Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa: a chromosome mapping approach. J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 600 617.
85. Starmer, W. T., W. B. Heed, and E. S. Rockwood-Sluss. 1977. Extension of longevity in Drosophila mojavensis by environmental ethanol: differences between subraces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 : 387 391.
86. Staten, R., S. Dixon Schully, and M. A. F. Noor. 2004. A microsatellite linkage map of Drosophila mojavensis. BMC Genet. 5 : 12.
87. Stennett, M. D., and W. J. Etges. 1997. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J. Chem. Ecol. 23 : 2803 2824. (Pubitemid 28031045)
88. Svetec, N., and J.-F. Ferveur. 2005. Social experience and pheromonal perception can change male-male interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 208 : 891 898. (Pubitemid 40428166)
89. Terai, Y., O. Seehausen, T. Sasaki, K. Takahashi, S. Mizoiri, T. Sugawara, T. Sato, M. Watanabe, N. Konijnendijk, H. D. J. Mrosso, et al. 2006. Divergent selection on opsins drives incipient speciation in Lake Victoria cichlids. PLoS Biol. 4 : e433.
90. Toolson, E. C., T. A. Markow, L. L. Jackson, and R. W. Howard. 1990. Epicuticular hydrocarbon composition of wild and laboratory-reared Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Crow (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83 : 1165 1176.
91. Via, S. 1999. Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea Aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53 : 1446 1457. (Pubitemid 29524139)
92. Via, S., A. C. Bouck, and S. Skillman. 2000. Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. II. Selection against migrants and hybrids in the parental environments. Evolution 54 : 1626 1637. (Pubitemid 30952476)
93. Zouros, E. 1974. Genic differentiation associated with the early stages of speciation in the mulleri subgroup of Drosophila. Evolution 27 : 601 621.