Definition of markov-harary invariants and review of classic topological indices and databases in biology, parasitology, technology, and social-legal networks

Current Bioinformatics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 94-121

  Riera Fernández, Pablo ^a   Munteanu, Cristian R ^b   Pedreira Souto, Nieves ^b   Martín Romalde, Raquel ^a   Duardo Sanchez, Aliuska ^a   González Díaz, Humberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biosystems; Complex networks; Food webs; Harary numbers; Host parasite networks; Markov chains; QSAR; Topological indices

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ELECTRIC NETWORK PARAMETERS; NETWORK THEORY (GRAPHS);

BIO-SYSTEMS; COMPLEX NETWORK THEORY; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; FOOD WEBS; HARARY NUMBER; HOST-PARASITE NETWORK; PARASITE-; PROTEIN NETWORK; QSAR; TOPOLOGICAL INDEX;

MARKOV PROCESSES;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOLOGY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PARASITOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SOCIAL NETWORK;

EID: 79953895047     PISSN: 15748936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157489311795222338     Document Type: Article

References (267)

1. Breiger R. The analysis of social networks. in handbook of data analysis, Hardy M, Bryman A, Eds. Sage Publications: London, 2004; pp 505-26.
2. Newman M. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 2003; 56: 167-256.
3. Abercrombie N, Hill S, Turner BS. Social structure. In The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology, 4th ed, Penguin: London, 2000.
4. Craig C. Social structure. In Dictionary of the Social Sciences, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2002.
5. White H, Scott boorman and Ronald Breiger. Social structure from multiple networks: I Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am J Sociol 1976; 81: 730-80.
6. Wellman B, Berkowitz SD. Social structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1988.
7. Bornholdt S, Schuster HG. Handbook of graphs and complex networks: From the Genome to the Internet. WILEY-VCH GmbH & CO. KGa: Wheinheim 2003.
8. Newman M. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 2003: 167-256.
9. Pertz OC, Wang Y, Yang F, et al. Spatial mapping of the neurite and soma proteomes reveals a functional Cdc42/Rac regulatory network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 1931-6.
10. Liao B, Ding K. Graphical approach to analyzing DNA sequences. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1519-23.
11. Randic M. Condensed representation of DNA primary sequences. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000; 40: 50-6.
12. Randić M, Vraćko M, Nandy A, Basak SC. On 3-D graphical representation of dna primary sequences and their numerical characterization. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000; 40: 1235-44.
13. Randic M, Basak SC. Characterization of DNA primary sequences based on the average distances between bases. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001; 41: 561-8.
14. Randic M, Balaban AT. On a four-dimensional representation of DNA primary sequences. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003; 43: 532-9.
15. Agüero-Chapin G, Gonzalez-Diaz H, Molina R, Varona-Santos J, Uriarte E, Gonzalez-Diaz Y. Novel 2D maps and coupling numbers for protein sequences. The first QSAR study of polygalacturonases; isolation and prediction of a novel sequence from Psidium guajava L. FEBS lett 2006; 580 723-30.
16. Chou KC. Review: Applications of graph theory to enzyme kinetics and protein folding kinetics. Steady and non-steady state systems Biophys Chem 1990; 35: 1-24.
17. Chou KC. Graphical rules in steady and non-steady enzyme kinetics J Biol Chem 1989; 264: 12074-9.
18. Chou KC, Forsen S. Graphical rules for enzyme-catalyzed rate laws. Biochem J 1980; 187: 829-35.
19. Sardiu ME, Cai Y, Jin J, et al. Probabilistic assembly of human protein interaction networks from label-free quantitative proteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 1454-9.
20. Kuzmic P, Ng KY, Heath TD. Mixtures of tight-binding enzyme inhibitors. Kinetic analysis by a recursive rate equation. Anal Biochem 1992; 200 68-73.
21. Althaus IW, Chou JJ, Gonzales AJ, et al. Steady-state kinetic studies with the non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor U-87201E. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 6119-24.
22. Althaus IW, Chou JJ, Gonzales AJ, et al. Kinetic studies with the nonnucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor U-88204E. Biochemistry 1993; 32: 6548-54.
23. Althaus IW, Chou JJ, Gonzales AJ, et al. Steady-state kinetic studies with the polysulfonate U-9843, an HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Experientia 1994; 50: 23-8.
24. Chou KC, Kezdy FJ, Reusser F. Review: Steady-state inhibition kinetics of processive nucleic acid polymerases and nucleases. Anal Biochem 1994; 221: 217-30.
25. Jegga AG, Inga A, Menendez D, Aronow BJ, Resnick MA. Functional evolution of the p53 regulatory network through its target response elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 944-9.
26. Pinney JW, Amoutzias GD, Rattray M, Robertson DL. Reconstruction of ancestral protein interaction networks for the bZIP transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 20449-53.
27. Chou KC, Zhang CT. Diagrammatization of codon usage in 339 HIV proteins and its biological implication. AIDS Res Human Retroviruses 1992; 8: 1967-76.
28. Zhang CT, Chou KC. Analysis of codon usage in 1562 E. Coli protein coding sequences. J Mol Biol 1994; 238: 1-8.
29. Diao Y, Li M, Feng Z, Yin J, Pan Y. The community structure of human cellular signaling network. J Theor Biol 2007; 247: 608-15.
30. González-Díaz H, Vilar S, Santana L, Uriarte E. Medicinal Chemistry and Bioinformatics-Current Trends in Drugs Discovery with Networks Topological Indices. Curr Top Med Chem 2007; 7: 1025-39.
31. Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Jordano P. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 19891-6.
32. Rodriguez-Soca Y, Munteanu CR, Dorado J, Pazos A, Prado-Prado FJ, Gonzalez-Diaz H. Trypano-PPI: a web server for prediction of unique targets in trypanosome proteome by using electrostatic parameters of protein-protein interactions. J Proteome Res 2010; 9(2): 1182-90.
33. Prado-Prado FJ, Gonzalez-Diaz H, de la Vega OM, Ubeira FM, Chou KC. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. Part 3: first multi-tasking QSAR model for input-coded prediction, structural back-projection, and complex networks clustering of antiprotozoal compounds. Bioorg Med Chem 2008; 16(11): 5871-80.
34. Godfrey SS, Bull CM, James R, Murray K. Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2010; 63(7): 1045-56.
35. Moreno JL. Who Shall Survive? Beacon House: New York 1934.
36. Padgett JF, Ansell CKJF. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. Amer J Sociol 1993; 98: 259-1319.
37. Mariolis P. Interlocking directorates and control of corporations: The theory of bank control. Social Sci Quart 1975; 56: 425-39.
38. Mizruchi MS. The American Corporate Network, 1904-1974. Sage: Beverly Hills 1982.
39. Klovdahl AS, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, Muth JB, Muth SQ, Darrow WW. Social networks and infectious disease: The Colorado Springs study. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 79-88.
40. Liljeros F, Edling CR, Amaral LAN, Stanley HE, Aberg Y. The web of human sexual contacts. Nature 2001; 411: 907-8.
41. Fowler JH, Jeon S. The authority of Supreme Court precedent. Soc Networks 2008; 30: 16-30.
42. Porter MA, Mucha PJ, Newman ME, Warmbrand CM. A network analysis of committees in the U.S. House of Representatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 7057-62.
43. González-Díaz H, Munteanu CR. Topological indices for medicinal chemistry, biology, parasitology, neurological and social networks. In Transworld Research Network Kerala, India, 2010; pp 001-212.
44. González-Díaz H, Prado-Prado F, García-Mera X. Complex network entropy: from molecules to biology, parasitology, technology, social, legal, and neurosciences. In Transworld Research Network: Kerala, India, 2011; pp 001-142.
45. González-Díaz H, González-Díaz Y, Santana L, Ubeira FM, Uriarte E. Proteomics, networks and connectivity indices. Proteomics 2008; 8: 750-78.
46. Pérez-Montoto LG, Prado-Prado F, Ubeira FM, González-Díaz H. Study of parasitic infections, cancer, and other diseases with massspectrometry and quantitative proteome-disease relationships. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 246-61.
47. González-Díaz H, Prado-Prado F, Pérez-Montoto LG, Duardo-Sánchez A, López-Díaz A. QSAR models for proteins of parasitic organisms, plants and human guests: theory, applications, legal protection, taxes, and regulatory issues. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 214-27.
48. Chen J, Shen B. Computational analysis of amino acid mutation: a proteome wide perspective. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 228-34.
49. Chou KC. Pseudo amino acid composition and its applications in bioinformatics, proteomics and system biology. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 262-74.
50. Torrens F, Castellano G. Topological charge-transfer indices: From small molecules to proteins. Curr Proteomics 2009: 204-13.
51. Giuliani A, Di Paola L, Setola R. Proteins as Networks: A mesoscopic approach using haemoglobin molecule as case study. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 235-45.
52. Vázquez JM, Aguiar V, Seoane JA, et al. Star graphs of protein sequences and proteome mass spectra in cancer prediction. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 275-88.
53. Ivanciuc O. Machine learning quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) for peptides binding to human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. Curr Proteomics 2009; 4: 289-302.
54. Gonzalez-Diaz H. Quantitative studies on Structure-Activity and Structure-Property Relationships (QSAR/QSPR). Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1554.
55. Ivanciuc O. Weka machine learning for predicting the phospholipidosis inducing potential. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1691-709.
56. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Prado-Prado F, Ubeira FM. Predicting antimicrobial drugs and targets with the MARCH-INSIDE approach. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1676-90.
57. Duardo-Sanchez A, Patlewicz G, Lopez-Diaz A. Current topics on software use in medicinal chemistry: intellectual property, taxes, and regulatory issues. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1666-75.
58. Wang JF, Wei DQ, Chou KC. Drug candidates from traditional chinese medicines. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1656-65.
59. Helguera AM, Combes RD, Gonzalez MP, Cordeiro MN. Applications of 2D descriptors in drug design: a DRAGON tale. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1628-55.
60. Gonzalez MP, Teran C, Saiz-Urra L, Teijeira M. Variable selection methods in QSAR: an overview. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1606-27.
61. Caballero J, Fernandez M. Artificial neural networks from MATLAB in medicinal chemistry. Bayesian-regularized genetic neural networks (BRGNN): application to the prediction of the antagonistic activity against human platelet thrombin receptor (PAR-1). Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1580-605.
62. Wang JF, Wei DQ, Chou KC. Pharmacogenomics and personalized use of drugs. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1573-9.
63. Vilar S, Cozza G, Moro S. Medicinal chemistry and the molecular operating environment (MOE): application of QSAR and molecular docking to drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1555-72.
64. Gonzalez-Diaz H. Network topological indices, drug metabolism, and distribution. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 283-4.
65. Chou KC. Graphic rule for drug metabolism systems. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 369-78.
66. Garcia I, Diop YF, Gomez G. QSAR & complex network study of the HMGR inhibitors structural diversity. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 307-14.
67. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Duardo-Sanchez A, et al. Review of MARCHINSIDE & complex networks prediction of drugs: ADMET, antiparasite activity, metabolizing enzymes and cardiotoxicity proteome biomarkers. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 379-406.
68. Khan MT. Predictions of the ADMET properties of candidate drug molecules utilizing different QSAR/QSPR modelling approaches. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 285-95.
69. Martinez-Romero M, Vazquez-Naya JM, Rabunal JR, et al. Artificial intelligence techniques for colorectal cancer drug metabolism: ontology and complex network. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 347-68.
70. Mrabet Y, Semmar N. Mathematical methods to analysis of topology, functional variability and evolution of metabolic systems based on different decomposition concepts. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 315-41.
71. Wang JF, Chou KC. Molecular modeling of cytochrome P450 and drug metabolism. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 342-6.
72. Zhong WZ, Zhan J, Kang P, Yamazaki S. Gender specific drug metabolism of PF-02341066 in rats--role of sulfoconjugation. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 296-306.
73. Gonzalez-Diaz H. QSAR and complex networks in pharmaceutical design, microbiology, parasitology, toxicology, cancer, and neurosciences. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2598-600.
74. Concu R, Podda G, Ubeira FM, Gonzalez-Diaz H. Review of QSAR models for enzyme classes of drug targets: Theoretical background and applications in parasites, hosts, and other organisms. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2710-23.
75. Estrada E, Molina E, Nodarse D, Uriarte E. Structural contributions of substrates to their binding to P-Glycoprotein. A TOPS-MODE approach. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2676-709.
76. Garcia I, Fall Y, Gomez G. QSAR, docking, and CoMFA studies of GSK3 inhibitors. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2666-75.
77. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Romaris F, Duardo-Sanchez A, et al. Predicting drugs and proteins in parasite infections with topological indices of complex networks: theoretical backgrounds, applications, and legal issues. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2737-64.
78. Marrero-Ponce Y, Casanola-Martin GM, Khan MT, Torrens F, Rescigno A, Abad C. Ligand-based computer-aided discovery of tyrosinase inhibitors. Applications of the TOMOCOMD-CARDD method to the elucidation of new compounds. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2601-24.
79. Munteanu CR, Fernandez-Blanco E, Seoane JA, et al. Drug discovery and design for complex diseases through QSAR computational methods. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2640-55.
80. Roy K, Ghosh G. Exploring QSARs with Extended Topochemical Atom (ETA) indices for modeling chemical and drug toxicity. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2625-39.
81. Speck-Planche A, Scotti MT, de Paulo-Emerenciano V. Current pharmaceutical design of antituberculosis drugs: future perspectives. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2656-65.
82. Vazquez-Naya JM, Martinez-Romero M, Porto-Pazos AB, et al. Ontologies of drug discovery and design for neurology, cardiology and oncology. Curr Pharm Design 2010; 16: 2724-36.
83. Speck-Planche A, Cordeiro MNDS. Application of bioinformatics for the search of novel anti-viral therapies: Rational design of antiherpes agents. Curr Bioinform 2011; 6: 81-93.
84. Chić O, Dumitru O, Concu R, Shen B. Reviewing yeast network and report of new Stochastic-Credibility cell cycle models. Curr Bioinform 2011; 6: 35-43.
85. Dave K, Banerjee A. Bioinformatics analysis of functional relations between CNPs regions. Curr Bioinform 2011; 6: 122-128.
86. García I, Fall Y, Gómez G. Trends in Bioinformatics and Chemoinformatics of Vitamin D analogues and their protein targets. Curr Bioinform 2011; 6: 16-24.
87. Wan SB, Hu LL, Niu S, Wang K, Cai YD, Lu WC, Chou KC. Identification of multiple subcellular locations for proteins in budding yeast. Curr Bioinform 2011; 6: 71-80.
88. Ivanciuc T, Ivanciuc O, Klein DJ. Quantitative Super-Structure Property Relationships (QSSPR): Reaction poset technique for chromatographic properties of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Curr Bioinform 2011; 6: 25-34.
89. Prado-Prado F, Escobar-Cubiella M, García-Mera X. Review of Bioinformatics and QSAR studies of β-secretase inhibitors. Curr Bioinform 2011; 6: 3-15.
90. Bhattacharjee B, Jayadeepa RM, Banerjee S, et al. Review of complex network and gene ontology in pharmacology approaches: Mapping natural compounds on potential drug target Colon Cancer network. Current Bioinform 2011; 6: 44-52.
91. Duardo-Sanchez A, Patlewicz G, González-Díaz H. A review of network topological indices from chem-bioinformatics to legal sciences and back. Current Bioinform 2011; 6(11): 53-70.
92. Berca MN, Duardo-Sanchez A, González-Díaz H, Pazos A, Munteanu CR. In: González-Díaz H, Prado-Prado FJ, García-Mera X, Eds. Complex Network Entropy: From Molecules to Biology, Parasitology, Technology, Social, Legal, and Neurosciences. Kerala, India, Transworld Res Network 2011; 127-42.
93. Begon M, Towsend CR, Harper JL. Ecology: From individuals to ecosistems. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons: 2006.
94. Ings TC, Montoya JM, Bascompte J, et al. Review: Ecological networks-beyond food webs. J Animal Ecol 2008; 78: 253-69.
95. Townsend CR, Thompson RM, McIntosh AR, Kilroy C, Edwards ED, Scarsbrook MR. Disturbance, resource supply and food-web architecture in streams. Ecol Lett 1998; 1: 200-9.
96. Thompson RM, Townsend CR. Energy availability, spatial heterogeneity and ecosystem size predict food-web structure in streams. Oikos 2005; 108: 137-48.
97. Thompson RM, Townsend CR. Impacts on stream food webs of native and exotic forest: an intercontinental comparison. Ecology 2003; 84: 145-61.
98. Jaarsma NG, de Boer SM, Townsend CR, Thompson RM, Edwards ED. Characterising food webs in two New Zealand streams. New Zealand J Marine and Freshwater Res 1998; 32: 271-86.
99. Thompson RM, Edwards ED, McIntosh AR, Townsend CR. Allocation of effort in stream food web studies-the best compromise? Marine and Freshwater Res 2001; 52: 339-45.
100. Thompson RM, Townsend CR. Is resolution the solution? the effect of taxonomic resolution on the calculated properties of three stream food webs. Freshwater Biol 2000; 43: 1-10.
101. Thompson RM, Townsend CR. The effect of seasonal variation on the community structure and food-web attributes of two streams: implications for food-web science. Oikos 1999; 87: 75-88.
102. Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, Kuris AM. Parasites dominate food web links. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 11211-6.
103. Lafferty KD, Hechinger RF, Shaw JC, Whitney KL, Kuris AM. Food webs and parasites in a salt marsh ecosystem. In Disease ecology: community structure and pathogen dynamics, Collinge, S, Ray, C., Eds. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2006; pp 119-34.
104. Huntly N. Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1991; 22: 477-503.
105. Strauss SY, Irwin RE. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2004; 35: 435-66.
106. Joern A. Feeding patterns in grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae): factors influencing diet specialization. Oecologia 1979; 38: 325-47.
107. Leather SR. Feeding specialisation and host distribution of British and Finnish Prunus feeding macrolepidoptera. Oikos 1991; 60: 40-8.
108. Desdevises Y, Morand S, Legendre P. Evolution and determinants of host specificity in the genus Lamellodiscus (Monogenea). Biol J Linnean Soc 2002; 77: 431-43.
109. Detwiler J, Janovy Jr., J. The role of phylogeny and ecology in experimental host specificity: Insights from a eugregarine-host system. J Parasitol 2008; 94: 7-12.
110. Perlman SJ, Spicer GS, Shoemaker DD, Jaenike J. Associations between mycophagous Drosophila and their Howardula nematode parasites: a worldwide phylogenetic shuffle. Mol Ecol 2003; 12: 237-49.
111. Hatcher JM, Dick JTA, Dunn AM. How parasites affect nteractions between competitors and predators. Ecol Lett 2006; 9: 1253-71.
112. Price PW, Westoby M, Rice B, et al. Parasite Mediation in Ecological Interactions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1986; 17: 485-505.
113. Anderson RM, May RM. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature 1979; 280: 361-7.
114. Arai HP, Mudry DR. Protozoan and metazoan parasites of fishes from the headwaters of the Parsnip and McGregor Rivers, British Columbia: a study of possible parasite transfaunations. Canadian J Fisheries Aquatic Sci 1983; 40: 1676-84.
115. Arthur JR, Margolis L, Arai HP. Parasites of fishes of Aishihik and Stevens Lakes, Yukon Territory, and potential consequences of heir interlake transfer through a proposed water diversion for hydroelectrical purposes. J Fisheries Res Board Canada 1976; 33: 2489-99.
116. Bangham RV. Studies on fish parasites of Lake Huron and Manitoulin Island. Am Midland Nat 1955; 53: 184-94.
117. Chinniah VC, Threlfall W. Metazoan parasites of fish from the Smallwood Reservoir, Labrador, Canada. J Fish Biol 1978; 13.
118. Dechtiar AO. Parasites of fish from Lake of the Woods, Ontario. J Fisheries Res Board Canada 1972; 29: 275-83.
119. Leong TS, Holmes JC. Communities of metazoan parasites in open water fishes of Cold Lake, Alberta. J Fish Biol 1981; 18: 693-713.
120. Roberts CM, McClean CJ, Veron JEN, et al. Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science 2002; 295: 1280-4.
121. Fautin D. Why do anemonefishes inhabit only some host actinians? Environ Biol Fishes 1986; 15: 171-80.
122. Ollerton J, McCollin D, Fautin DG, Allen GR. Finding NEMO: Nestedness engendered by mutualistic organisation in anemonefish and their hosts. Proc Royal Soc B 2007.
123. Fauting DG, Allen GR. Anemonefishes and their host sea anemones. Western Australian Museum. Revised edi.: Perth, Australia 1997.
124. Beattie AJ, Hughes L. Ant-plant interactions. In Plant-animal interaction: An evolutionary approach, Herrera CM, Pellmyr O, Eds. Blackwell Publishing: 2002; pp. 211-35.
125. Beattie AJ. The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. 1985.
126. Heil M, McKey D. Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2003; 34: 425-53.
127. Blüthgen N, Stork NE, Fiedler K. Bottom-up control and cooccurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos 2004; 106: 344-58.
128. Blüthgen N, Fiedler K. Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. J Animal Ecol 2004; 73: 155-66.
129. Davidson DW, Snelling RR, Longino JT. Competition among ants for myrmecophytes and the significance of plant trichomes. Biotropica 1989; 21: 64-73.
130. Davidson DW, Fisher BL. Symbiosis of ants with Cecropia as a function of light regime. In Ant-Plant Interactions, Huxley CR, Cutler DF, Eds. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1991; pp 289-309.
131. Fonseca CR, Ganade G. Asymmetries, compartments and null interactions in an Amazonian ant-plant community. J Animal Ecol 1996; 66: 339-47.
132. Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Royal Soc B 2007; 274: 303-13.
133. Waser M. Specialization and generalization in plant-pollinator interactions: A historical perspective. In Plant-pollinator interactions: From specialization to generalization, Waser M, Ollerton J, Eds. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 2006; pp 3-17.
134. Bascompte J, Jordano P. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: The architecture of biodiversity. The Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2007; 38: 567-93.
135. Jordano P. Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: Connectance, dependence asymetries and coevolution. Am Nat 1987; 129: 657-77.
136. Arroyo MTK, Primack RB, JAJ. Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of Central Chile. I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. Am J Botany 1982; 69: 82-97.
137. Barrett SCH, Helenurm K. The reproductive-biology of boreal forest herbs 1. Breeding systems and pollination. Canadian J Botany 1987; 65: 2036-46.
138. Elberling H, Olesen JM. The structure of a high latitude plantflower visitor system: the dominance of flies. Ecography 1999; 22: 314-23.
139. Dupont YL, Hansen DM, Olesen JM. Structure of a plant-flowervisitor network in the high-altitude sub-alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Ecography 2003; 26: 301-10.
140. Herrera CM. Seed dispersal by vertebrates. In Plant-animal nteractions: An evolutionary aproach, Herrera CM, Pellmyr O, Eds. Blackwell Publishing: 2002; pp 185-208.
141. Beehler B. Frugivory and polygamy in birds of paradise. The Auk 1983; 100: 1-12.
142. Poulin B, Wright SJ, Lefebvre G, Calderon O. Interspecific synchrony and asynchrony in the fruiting phenologies of congeneric bird-dispersed plants in Panama. J Tropical Ecol 1999; 15: 213-27.
143. Snow BK, Snow, DW. The feeding ecology of Tanagers and honeycreeperes in Trinidad. The Auk 1971; 88: 291-322.
144. Sorensen AE. Interactions between birds and fruit in a temperate woodland. Oecologia 1981; 50: 242-9.
145. Batagelj V, Mrvar A. Pajek: A program for large network analysis. Connections 1998; 21: 47-57.
146. Sun S, Ling L, Zhang N, Li G, Chen R. Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 2443-50
147. Hlebec V. Recall versus recognition: Comparison of the two alternative procedures for collecting social network data. Developments in Statistics and Methodology, Metodološki zvezki 1993; 9: 121-9.
148. Kropivnik S, Mrvar A. An analysis of the slovene parliamentary parties network. Developments in Statistics and Methodology, Metodološki zvezki 1996; 12: 209-16.
149. Doreian P, Mrvar A. A partitioning approach to structural balance. Soc Networks 1996; 18: 149-68.
150. Taylor PJ, Walker DRF. World cities: a first multivariate analysis of their service complexes. Urban Studies 2001; 38: 23-47.
151. Taylor PJ. Urban hinterworlds: geographies of corporate service provision under conditions of contemporary globalization Geography 2001; 86: 51-60.
152. Taylor PJ, Walker DRF, Beaverstock JV. Firms and their global service networks. In Global Networks, linked cities, Sassen S, Ed. Routledge New York, London, 2002; pp 93-115.
153. Imrich W, Klavžar S. Product graphs: structure and recognition. John Wiley & Sons: New York, USA 2000.
154. Newman MEJ. Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Phys Rev E 2006; 74: 1-22.
155. Newman MEJ. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 2003; 45: 167-256.
156. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Phys Reports 2006; 424: 175-308.
157. Newman MEJ. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Phys Rev E 2001; 64: 1-7.
158. Bernard H, Killworth P, Sailer L. Informant accuracy in social network data IV. Soc Networks 1980; 2: 191-218.
159. Bernard H, Killworth P, Sailer L. Informant accuracy in social network data V. Soc Sci Res 1982; 11: 30-66.
160. Romney K, Weller S. Predicting informant accuracy from patterns of recall among individuals. Soc Networks 1984; 6: 59-78.
161. Davis A, Burleigh B, Gardner B, Gardner MR. Deep South. Chicago. University of Chicago Press 1941.
162. Breiger R. The duality of persons and groups. Soc Forces 1974; 53: 181-90.
163. MacRae J. Direct factor analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry 1960; 23: 360-71.
164. Kapferer B. Strategy and transaction in an African factory: African workers and Indian management in a Zambian town. Manchester University Press: Manchester 1972.
165. Roethlisberger F, Dickson W. Management and the worker: An account of a research program conduced by the Western electric company, Hawthorne works, Chicago. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1939.
166. Homans G. The human group. Harcourt-Brace: New York 1950.
167. Breiger R, Boorman S, Arabie P. An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. J Mathematical Psychol 1975; 12: 328-83.
168. Hage P, Harary F. Structural models in anthropology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1983.
169. Schwimmer E. Exchange in the social structure of the Orokaiva: Traditional and emergent ideologies in the Northern district of Papua. St Martińs Press: New York 1973.
170. Ziegler R, Bender R, Biehler H. Industry and banking in the German corporate network. In Networks of corporate power, Stokman F, Ziegler R, Scott J, Eds. Polity Press: Cambridge, 1985.
171. Stokman F, Wasseur F, Elsas D. The Dutch network: Types of interlocks and network structure. In Networks of corporate power, Stokman F, Ziegler R, Scott J, Eds. Polity Press: Cambridge, 1985.
172. Thurman B. In the office: Networks and coalitions. Soc Networks 1979; 2: 47-63.
173. Zachary W. An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. J Anthropol Res 1977; 33: 452-73.
174. Malik A, Kakii K. Pair-dependent co-aggregation behavior of nonflocculating sludge bacteria. Biotechnol Lett 2003; 25(12): 981-6.
175. González-Díaz H, Mezo M, González-Warleta M, Muíño-Pose L, Paniagua E, Ubeira FM. In: González-Díaz H, Munteanu CR, Eds. Topological Indices for Medicinal Chemistry, Biology, Parasitology, Neurological and Social Networks. Kerala (India), Transworld Research Network 2010; 191-204.
176. Menke R. Linked: The New Science of Networks (review). Perspectives Biol & Med 2004; 47: 300-3.
177. Huynen MA, Snel B, von Mering C, Bork P. Function prediction and protein networks. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003; 15: 191-8.
178. Zhou GP, Deng MH. An extension of Chou's graphical rules for deriving enzyme kinetic equations to system involving parallel reaction pathways. Biochem J 1984; 222: 169-76.
179. Lin SX, Neet KE. Demonstration of a slow conformational change in liver glucokinase by fluorescence spectroscopy. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 9670-5.
180. Althaus IW, Gonzales AJ, Chou JJ, et al. The quinoline U-78036 is a potent inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 14875-80.
181. Barabasi AL. Sociology. Network theory-the emergence of the creative enterprise. Science 2005; 308: 639-41.
182. Barabasi AL, Bonabeau E. Scale-free networks. Sci Am 2003; 288: 60-9.
183. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5: 101-13.
184. Selassie CD, Mekapati SB, Verma RP. QSAR: then and now. Curr Top Med Chem 2002; 2: 1357-79.
185. Gozalbes R, Doucet JP, Derouin F. Application of topological descriptors in QSAR and drug design: history and new trends. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord 2002; 2: 93-102.
186. Honey CJ, Kotter R, Breakspear M, Sporns O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 10240-5.
187. McDonald DB. Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 10910-4.
188. Hahn MW, Kern AD. Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Mol Biol & Evol 2005; 22: 803-6.
189. Altmann M. Reinterpreting network measures for models of disease transmission. Soc Networks 1993; 15: 1-17.
190. Bonchev D, Buck GA. From molecular to biological structure and back. J Chem Inf Model 2007; 47: 909-17.
191. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Phys Reports 2006; 424: 175-308.
192. Balaban AT, Basak SC, Beteringhe A, Mills D, Supuran CT. QSAR study using topological indices for inhibition of carbonic anhydrase II by sulfanilamides and Schiff bases. Mol Divers 2004; 8: 401-12.
193. Abraham M. H, Kumarsingh R, Cometto-Muniz JE, Cain WS. Draize eye scores and eye irritation thresholds in man can be combined into one QSAR. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 855: 652-6.
194. Agrawal VK, Bano S, Khadikar PV. Topological approach to quantifying molecular lipophilicity of heterogeneous set of organic compounds. Bioorg & Med Chem 2003; 11: 4039-47.
195. Barratt MD. Integrating computer prediction systems with in vitro methods towards a better understanding of toxicology. Toxicol Lett 1998; 102-103: 617-21.
196. Benigni R, Andreoli C, Giuliani A. QSAR models for both mutagenic potency and activity: application to nitroarenes and aromatic amines. Environ Mol Mutagen 1994; 24: 208-19.
197. Garcia-Garcia A, Galvez J, de Julian-Ortiz JV, et al. Search of chemical scaffolds for novel antituberculosis agents. J Biomol Screen 2005; 10: 206-14.
198. Katritzky AR, Gordeeva EV. Traditional topological indices vs electronic, geometrical, and combined molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR research. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1993; 33: 835-57.
199. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Wiley-VCH: 2002.
200. Estrada E. Generalization of topological indices. Chem Phys Lett 2001; 336: 248-52.
201. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Cruz-Monteagudo M, Vina D, Santana L, Uriarte E, De Clercq E. QSAR for anti-RNA-virus activity, synthesis, and assay of anti-RSV carbonucleosides given a unified representation of spectral moments, quadratic, and topologic indices. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005; 15: 1651-7.
202. Estrada E, Uriarte E. Recent advances on the role of topological indices in drug discovery research. Curr Med Chem 2001; 8: 1573-88.
203. Devillers J, Balaban AT. Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR. Gordon and Breach: The Netherlands 1999.
204. Matamala AR, Estrada E. Simplex Optimization of Generalized Topological Index (GTI-Simplex): A Unified Approach to Optimize QSPR Models. J Phys Chem A 2005; 109: 9890-5.
205. Matamala AR, Estrada E. Generalised topological indices: Optimisation methodology and physico-chemical interpretation. Chem Phys Lett 2005; 410 343-7.
206. Marrero-Ponce Y, Medina-Marrero R, Torrens F, Martinez Y, Romero-Zaldivar V, Castro EA. Atom, atom-type, and total nonstochastic and stochastic quadratic fingerprints: a promising approach for modeling of antibacterial activity. Bioorg & Med Chem 2005; 13: 2881-99.
207. Marrero-Ponce Y, Montero-Torres A, Zaldivar CR, Veitia MI, Perez MM, Sanchez RN. Non-stochastic and stochastic linear indices of the 'molecular pseudograph's atom adjacency matrix': application to 'in silico' studies for the rational discovery of new antimalarial compounds. Bioorg & Med Chem 2005; 13: 1293-304.
208. Sabidussi G. The Centrality Index of a Graph. Psychometrika 1966; 31: 581-603.
209. Freeman LC. A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry 1977; 40: 35-41.
210. Junker BH, Koschuetzki D, Schreiber F. Exploration of biological network centralities with CentiBiN. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7(1): 219.
211. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003; 13(11): 2498-504.
212. Estrada E, Rodriguez-Velazquez JA. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Phys Rev E 2005; 71(5 Pt 2): 056103.
213. Aguero-Chapin G, Antunes A, Ubeira FM, Chou KC, Gonzalez-Diaz H. Comparative study of topological indices of macro/supramolecular RNA complex networks. J Chemical Inform Modeling 2008; 48(11): 2265-77.
214. Boyen P, Van Dyck D, Neven F, van Ham RC, van Dijk AD. SLIDER: A Generic Metaheuristic for the Discovery of Correlated Motifs in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2011.
215. Fung DC. Modeling and analyzing gene co-expression in hepatocellular carcinoma using actor-semiotic networks and centrality signatures. Cancer Inform 2008; 6: 463-74.
216. van den Heuvel MP, Mandl RC, Stam CJ, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE. Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: a graph theoretical analysis. J Neurosci 2010; 30(47): 15915-26.
217. Aguiar-Pulido V, Seoane-Fernández JA, Freire-Veiga AM, et al. New Markov-Randic Centralities for Computational methods of Biology, Parasitology, Technology, Social and Law networks. ICCMSE 2010; Kos (Greece).
218. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Techl J 1948; 27: 379-423 and 623-56.
219. Randić M. Characterization of molecular branching. J Am Chem Soc 1975; 97(23): 6609-15.
220. Agrawal VK, Banerji M, Gupta M, Singh J, Khadikar PV, Supuran CT. QSAR study on carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: water-soluble sulfonamides incorporating beta-alanyl moieties, possessing long lasting-intra ocular pressure lowering properties-a molecular connectivity approach. Eur J Med Chem 2005; 40(10): 1002-12.
221. Khadikar PV, Agrawal VK, Karmarkar S. Prediction of lipophilicity of polyacenes using quantitative structure-activity relationships. Bioorg Med Chem 2002; 10(11): 3499-507.
222. Smissaert HR, Jansen AA. On the variation of toxic effects over species, its cause, and analysis by "structure-selectivity relations". Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1984; 8(3): 294-302.
223. Bermudez CI, Daza EE, Andrade E. Characterization and comparison of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs by graph theory based on secondary structure. J Theor Biol 1999; 197(2): 193-205.
224. StatSoft. Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6.0, www. statsoft.com.Statsoft, Inc. 6.0 ed 2002.
225. Toba S, Gibson TM, Shiroguchi K, Toyoshima YY, Asai DJ. Properties of the full-length heavy chains of Tetrahymena ciliary outer arm dynein separated by urea treatment. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2004; 58(1): 30-8.
226. Bezerra ELS, Machado IC, Mello MAR. Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds. J Anim Ecol 2009; 78: 1096-101.
227. Clements RE, Long FL. Experimental pollination. An outline of the ecology of flowers and insects. Washington, DC, USA, Carnegie Institute of Washington 1923.
228. Hocking B. Insect-flower associations in the high Arctic with special reference to nectar. Oikos 1968; 19: 359-88.
229. Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Traveset A, Hansen DM. Conservation and restoration of plant-animal mutualisms on oceanic islands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 2009; 12: 131-43.
230. Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Muff S, Memmot J, Muller CB, Caflisch A. The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecol Lett 2010; 13: 442-52.
231. Kato M, Makutani T, Inoue T, Itino T. Insect-flower relationship in the primary beech forest of Ashu, Kyoto: an overview of the flowering phenology and seasonal pattern of insect visits. Contr Biol Lab Kyoto Univ 1990; 27: 309-75.
232. Kevan PG. High arctic insect-flower visitor relations: the interrelationships of arthropods and flowers at Lake Hazen, Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Thesis, Edmonton: University of Alberta; 1970.
233. Inouye DW, Pyke GH. Pollination biology in the Snowy Mountains of Australia: comparisons with montane Colorado, USA. Aust J Ecol 1988; 13: 191-210.
234. McMullen CK. Flower-visiting insects of the Galapagos Islands. Pan-Pac Entomol 1993; 69: 95-106.
235. Medan D, Montaldo NH, Devoto M, Mantese A, Vasellati V, Bartoloni NH. Plant-pollinator relationships at two altitudes in the Andes of Mendoza, Argentina. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Res 2002; 34: 233-41.
236. Memmott J. The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. Ecol Lett 1999; 2: 276-80.
237. Mosquin T, Martin JEH. Observations on the pollination biology of plants on Melville Island, NWT, Canada. Canadian Field Naturalist 1967; 81: 201-5.
238. Motten AF. Pollination Ecology of the spring wildflower community in the deciduous forests of piedmont North Carolina. Thesis, Durham, North Carolina, USA: Duke University; 1982.
239. Motten AF. Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecol Monogr 1986; 56: 21-42.
240. Olesen JM, Eskildsen LI, Venkatasamy S. Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists. Divers Distrib 2002; 8: 181-92.
241. Ollerton J, Johnson SD, Cranmer L, Kellie S. The pollination ecology of an assemblage of grassland asclepiads in South Africa. Ann Bot 2003; 92: 807-34.
242. Ramirez N, Brito Y. Pollination biology in a palm swamp community in the venezuelan central plains. Bot J Linn Soc 1992; 110: 277-302.
243. Robertson C. Flowers and insects: lists of visitors to four hundred and fifty-three flowers. Science Press Printing Company: Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA 1929.
244. Marlin JC, LaBerge WE. The native bee fauna of Carlinville, Illinois, revisited after 75 years: a case for persistence. Conserv Ecol 2001; 5(1): 9.
245. Santos GMM, Aguiar CML, Mello MAR. Flower-visiting guild associated with the Caatinga flora: trophic interaction networks formed by social bees and social wasps with plants. Apidologie 2010; 41(4): 466-75.
246. Schemske DW, Willson MF, Melampy MN, et al. Flowering Ecology of Some Spring Woodland Herbs. Ecology 1978; 59: 351-66.
247. Small E. Insect pollinators of the Mer Bleue peat bog of Ottawa. Canadian Field Naturalist 1976; 90: 22-8.
248. Vázquez DP. Interactions among introduced ungulates, plants, and pollinators: A field study in the temperate forest of the Southern Andes. Thesis, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA: University of Tennessee; 2002.
249. Vázquez DP, Simberloff D. Ecological specialization and susceptibility to disturbance: conjectures and refutations. Am Nat 2002; 159: 606-23.
250. Vázquez DP, Simberloff D. Changes in interaction biodiversity induced by an introduced ungulate. Ecol Lett 2003; 6: 1077-83.
251. Schleuning M, Blüthgen N, Flörchinger M, Braun J, Schaefer HM, Böhning-Gaese K. Specialization and interaction strength in a tropical plant-frugivore network differ among forest strata. Ecology: In Press, DOI: 10.1890/09-42.1.
252. Snow BK, Snow DW. Birds and Berries: A study of an ecological interaction. Poyser: Calton, England 1988.
253. Killworth B, Bernard H. Informant accuracy in social network data. Hum Organ 1976; 35: 269-86.
254. Bernard H, Killworth P. Informant accuracy in social network data II. Human Commun Res 1977; 4: 3-18.
255. Killworth P, Bernard H. Informant accuracy in social network data III. Soc Networks 1979; 2: 19-46.
256. Kapferer B. In: Mitchell J, Ed. Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns Manchester, Manchester University Press 1969; 366.
257. Doreian P. On the connectivity of social networks. J Mathematical Sociol 1974; 3: 245-58.
258. Knoke D, Wood J. Organized for action: Commitment in voluntary associations. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ 1981.
259. Knoke D, Kuklinski J. Network analysis. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA 1982.
260. Krackhardt D. Cognitive social structures. Soc Networks 1987; 9: 104-34.
261. Newcomb T. The acquaintance process. Holt, Reinhard & Winston: New York 1961.
262. Nordlie P. A longitudinal study of interpersonal attraction in a natural group setting. Thesis: University of Michigan 1958.
263. White H, Boorman S, Breiger R. Social structure from multiple networks, I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am J Sociol 1977; 81: 730-80.
264. Breiger R, Pattison P. Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Soc Networks 1986; 8: 215-56.
265. Kent D. The rise of the Medici: Faction in Florence, 1426-1434. Oxford University Press: Oxford 1978.
266. Read K. Cultures of the central highlands, New Guinea. Southwestern J Anthropol 1954; 10: 1-43.
267. Sampson S. Crisis in a cloister. Thesis: Cornell University; 1969.