Identification of multiple subcellular locations for proteins in budding yeast

Current Bioinformatics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 71-80

  Wan, Si Bao ^a   Hu, Le Le ^b,c   Niu, Sheng ^d   Wang, Kai ^c   Cai, Yu Dong ^c,e   Lu, Wen Cong ^b   Chou, Kuo Chen ^e  

^a Shanghai University   (China)

^b SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^e GORDON LIFE SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Incremental feature selection; Multi subcellular locations; Sort PLoc

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FEATURE SELECTION; FORECASTING; GENE ONTOLOGY; LOCATION;

BUDDING YEASTS; FEATURES SELECTION; IN-VIVO; INCREMENTAL FEATURE SELECTION; MULTI SUBCELLULAR LOCATION; MULTIPLEX PROTEINS; PROTEIN SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION; SORT-PLOC; SUBCELLULAR COMPARTMENTS; SUBCELLULAR LOCATION;

PROTEINS;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; INCREMENTAL FEATURE SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SORT PLOC TECHNOLOGY; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 79953896688     PISSN: 15748936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157489311795222374     Document Type: Article

References (152)

1. Chou KC. Review: prediction of protein signal sequences. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2002; 3: 615-22.
2. Goley ED, Toro E, McAdams HH, Shapiro L. Dynamic chromosome organization and protein localization coordinate the regulatory circuitry that drives the bacterial cell cycle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2009; 74: 55-64.
3. Ruttiger L, Panford-Walsh R, Schimmang T, et al. BDNF mRNA expression and protein localization are changed in age-related hearing loss. Neurobiol Aging 2007; 28: 586-601.
4. Westbrook VA, Schoppee PD, Vanage GR, et al. Hominoidspecific SPANXA/D genes demonstrate differential expression in individuals and protein localization to a distinct nuclear envelope domain during spermatid morphogenesis. Mol Hum Reprod 2006; 12: 703-16.
5. Wolter KG, Hsu YT, Smith CL, et al. Movement of Bax from the cytosol to mitochondria during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 1997; 139: 1281-92.
6. Fox K. Synaptic plasticity: the subcellular location of CaMKII controls plasticity. Curr Biol 2003; 13: R143-5.
7. Schaefer M, Knoblich JA. Protein localization during asymmetric cell division. Exp Cell Res 2001; 271: 66-74.
8. Sanford JR, Bruzik JP. Regulation of SR protein localization during development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 10184-9.
9. Henderson MA, Danks JA, Slavin JL, et al. Parathyroid hormonerelated protein localization in breast cancers predict improved prognosis. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 2250-6.
10. Lee X, Keith JC Jr, Stumm N, et al. Downregulation of placental syncytin expression and abnormal protein localization in preeclampsia. Placenta 2001; 22: 808-12.
11. Krutovskikh V, Mazzoleni G, Mironov N, et al. Altered homologous and heterologous gap-junctional intercellular communication in primary human liver tumors associated with aberrant protein localization but not gene mutation of connexin 32. Int J Cancer 1994; 56: 87-94.
12. Campbell JB, Crocker J, Shenoi PM. S-100 protein localization in minor salivary gland tumours: an aid to diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102: 905-8.
13. Hayama A, Rai, T, Sasaki, S, Uchida, S. Molecular mechanisms of Bartter syndrome caused by mutations in the BSND gene. Histochem Cell Biol 2003; 119: 485-93.
14. Cedano J, Aloy P, Perez-Pons JA, Querol E. Relation between amino acid composition and cellular location of proteins. J Mol Biol 1997; 266: 594-600.
15. Reinhardt A, Hubbard T. Using neural networks for prediction of the subcellular location of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26: 2230-6.
16. Chou KC, Elrod DW. Protein subcellular location prediction. Protein Eng 1999; 12: 107-18.
17. Nair R, Rost B. Better prediction of sub-cellular localization by combining evolutionary and structural information. Prot-Struct Funct Genet 2003; 53: 917-30.
18. Park KJ, Kanehisa M. Prediction of protein subcellular locations by support vector machines using compositions of amino acids and amino acid pairs. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1656-63.
19. Garg A, Bhasin M, Raghava, GP. Support vector machine-based method for subcellular localization of human proteins using amino acid compositions, their order, and similarity search. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 14427-32.
20. Nakai K, Kanehisa M. A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells. Genomics 1992; 14: 897-911.
21. Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol 2000; 300: 1005-16.
22. Chou KC. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudoamino acid composition. Protein Struct Funct Genet 2001; 43: 246-55.
23. Chou KC. Pseudo amino acid composition and its applications in bioinformatics, proteomics and system biology. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 262-74.
24. Cai YD, Chou KC. Predicting membrane protein type by functional domain composition and pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2006; 238: 395-400.
25. Chen YL, Li QZ. Prediction of apoptosis protein subcellular location using improved hybrid approach and pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2007; 248: 377-81.
26. Esmaeili M, Mohabatkar H, Mohsenzadeh S. Using the concept of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition for risk type prediction of human papillomaviruses. J Theor Biol 2010; 263: 203-9.
27. Georgiou DN, Karakasidis TE, Nieto JJ, Torres A. Use of fuzzy clustering technique and matrices to classify amino acids and its impact to Chou's pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2009; 257: 17-26.
28. Lin H. The modified Mahalanobis discriminant for predicting outer membrane proteins by using Chou's pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2008; 252: 350-6.
29. Shen HB, Yang J, Chou KC. Fuzzy KNN for predicting membrane protein types from pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2006; 240: 9-13.
30. Wang SQ, Yang J, Chou KC. Using stacked generalization to predict membrane protein types based on pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2006; 242: 941-6.
31. Xiao X, Wang P, Chou KC. Predicting protein structural classes with pseudo amino acid composition: an approach using geometric moments of cellular automaton image. J Theor Biol 2008; 254: 691-6.
32. Zeng YH, Guo YZ, Xiao RQ, Yang L, Yu LZ, Li ML. Using the augmented Chou's pseudo amino acid composition for predicting protein sub mitochondria locations based on auto covariance approach. J Theor Biol 2009; 259: 366-72.
33. Zhang GY, Fang BS. Predicting the cofactors of oxidoreductases based on amino acid composition distribution and Chou's amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2008; 253: 310-5.
34. Zhang TL, Ding YS, Chou KC. Prediction protein structural classes with pseudo amino acid composition: approximate entropy and hydrophobicity pattern. J Theor Biol 2008; 250: 186-93.
35. Qiu JD, Huang JH, Shi SP, Liang RP. Using the concept of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme family classes: an approach with support vector machine based on discrete wavelet transform. Protein Pept Lett 2010; 17: 715-22.
36. Chen C, Chen L, Zou X, Cai P. Prediction of protein secondary structure content by using the concept of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition and support vector machine. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16: 27-31.
37. Ding H, Luo L, Lin H. Prediction of cell wall lytic enzymes using Chou's amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16: 351-5.
38. Ding YS, Zhang TL, Chou KC. Prediction of protein structure classes with pseudo amino acid composition and fuzzy support vector machine network. Protein Pept Lett 2007; 14: 811-5.
39. Jiang X, Wei R, Zhang TL, Gu Q. Using the concept of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition to predict apoptosis proteins subcellular location: an approach by approximate entropy. Protein Pept Lett 2008; 15; 392-6.
40. Li FM, Li QZ. Predicting protein subcellular location using Chou's pseudo amino acid composition and improved hybrid approach. Protein Pept Lett 2008; 15: 612-6.
41. Lin H, Ding H, Guo FB, Zhang AY, Huang J. Predicting subcellular localization of mycobacterial proteins by using Chou's pseudo amino acid composition. Protein Pept Lett 2008; 15: 739-44.
42. Liu T, Zheng X, Wang C, Wang J. Prediction of subcellular location of apoptosis proteins using pseudo amino acid composition: An approach from auto covariance transformation. Protein Pept Lett 2010; 17; 1263-9.
43. Mohabatkar H. Prediction of cyclin proteins using chou's pseudo amino acid composition. Protein Pept Lett 2010; 17: 1207-14.
44. Chen C, Zhou X, Tian Y, Zou X, Cai P. Predicting protein structural class with pseudo-amino acid composition and support vector machine fusion network. Anal Biochem 2006; 357: 116-21.
45. Gao QB, Jin ZC, Ye XF, Wu C, He J. Prediction of nuclear receptors with optimal pseudo amino acid composition. Anal Biochem 2009; 387: 54-9.
46. Gao QB, Ye XF, Jin ZC, He J. Improving discrimination of outer membrane proteins by fusing different forms of pseudo amino acid composition. Anal Biochem 2010; 398: 52-9.
47. Qiu JD, Huang JH, Liang RP, Lu XQ. Prediction of G-proteincoupled receptor classes based on the concept of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition: an approach from discrete wavelet transform. Anal Biochem 2009; 390: 68-73.
48. Lin H, Li QZ. Using pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein structural class: Approached by incorporating 400 dipeptide components. J Comput Chem 2007; 28: 1463-6.
49. Zou D, He Z, He J, Xia Y. Supersecondary structure prediction using Chou's pseudo amino acid composition. J Comput Chem 2010; 10.1002/jcc.21616.
50. Xiao X, Lin WZ, Chou KC. Using grey dynamic modeling and pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein structural classes. J Comput Chem 2008; 29: 2018-24.
51. Xiao X, Shao SH, Huang ZD, Chou KC. Using pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein structural classes: approached with complexity measure factor. J Comput Chem 2006; 27: 478-82.
52. Aguero-Chapin G, Varona-Santos J, de la Riva GA, et al. Alignment-free prediction of polygalacturonases with pseudofolding topological indices: experimental isolation from coffea arabica and prediction of a new sequence. J Proteome Res 2009; 8: 2122-8.
53. Chou, KC. Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition (50th Anniversary Year Review). J Theor Biol 2011; 273: 236-47.
54. Perez-Bello A, Munteanu CR, Ubeira FM, De Magalhaes AL, Uriarte E, Gonzalez-Diaz H. Alignment-free prediction of mycobacterial DNA promoters based on pseudo-folding lattice network or star-graph topological indices. J Theor Biol 2009; 256: 458-66.
55. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Dea-Ayuela MA, Perez-Montoto LG, et al. QSAR for RNases and theoretic-experimental study of molecular diversity on peptide mass fingerprints of a new Leishmania infantum protein. Mol Divers 2010; 14: 349-69.
56. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 25-9.
57. Camon E, Magrane M, Barrell D, et al. The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database: sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: D262-6.
58. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: D258-61.
59. Chou KC, Shen HB. A new method for predicting the subcellular localization of eukaryotic proteins with both single and multiple sites: Euk-mPLoc 2.0. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e9931.
60. Chou KC, Shen HB. Plant-mPLoc: a top-down strategy to augment the power for predicting plant protein subcellular localization. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e11335.
61. Chou KC, Shen HB. Cell-PLoc 2.0: An improved package of webservers for predicting subcellular localization of proteins in various organisms. Nat Sci 2010; 2: 1090-103.
62. Chou KC, Shen HB. Cell-PLoc: a package of Web servers for predicting subcellular localization of proteins in various organisms. Nat Protocols 2008; 3: 153-62.
63. Chou KC, Shen HB. Recent progress in protein subcellular location prediction. Anal Biochem 2007; 370: 1-16.
64. Chou KC, Cai YD. Predicting protein localization in budding yeast. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 944-50.
65. Cai YD, Chou KC. Predicting 22 protein localizations in budding yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 323: 425-8.
66. Guldener U, Munsterkotter M, Kastenmuller G, et al. W. CYGD: the comprehensive yeast genome database. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: D364-8.
67. Bairoch A, Bougueleret L, Altairac S, et al. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: D193-D7.
68. Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, et al. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: 37-40.
69. Peng H, Long F, Ding C. Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and minredundancy. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 2005; 27: 1226-38.
70. Ding C, Peng H. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2005; 3: 185-205.
71. Zhou J, Peng H. Automatic recognition and annotation of gene expression patterns of fly embryos. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 589-96.
72. Cai YD, Lu L. Predicting N-terminal acetylation based on feature selection method. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 372: 862-5.
73. Chou KC, Zhang CT. Review: prediction of protein structural classes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1995; 30: 275-349.
74. Zhou GP. An intriguing controversy over protein structural class prediction. J Protein Chem 1998; 17: 729-38.
75. Zhou GP, Assa-Munt N. Some insights into protein structural class prediction. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2001; 44: 57-59.
76. Zhou GP, Doctor K. Subcellular location prediction of apoptosis proteins. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2003; 50: 44-8.
77. Ji G, Wu X, Shen Y, Huang J, Li Q. A classification-based prediction model of messenger RNA polyadenylation sites. J Theor Biol 2010; 265: 287-96.
78. Shao X, Tian Y, Wu L, Wang Y, Jing L, Deng N. Predicting DNAand RNA-binding proteins from sequences with kernel methods. J Theor Biol 2009; 258: 289-93.
79. Yang JY, Peng ZL, Yu ZG, Zhang RJ, Anh V, Wang D. Prediction of protein structural classes by recurrence quantification analysis based on chaos game representation. J Theor Biol 2009; 257: 618-26.
80. Chen C, Chen LX, Zou XY, Cai PX. Predicting protein structural class based on multi-features fusion. J Theor Biol 2008; 253: 388-92.
81. Du P, Li Y. Prediction of C-to-U RNA editing sites in plant mitochondria using both biochemical and evolutionary information. J Theor Biol 2008; 253: 579-89.
82. Vilar S, Gonzalez-Diaz H, Santana L, Uriarte E. A network-QSAR model for prediction of genetic-component biomarkers in human colorectal cancer. J Theor Biol 2009; 261: 449-58.
83. Wang T, Xia T, Hu XM. Geometry preserving projections algorithm for predicting membrane protein types. J Theor Biol 2010; 262: 208-13.
84. Zhou XB, Chen C, Li ZC, Zou XY. Using Chou's amphiphilic pseudo-amino acid composition and support vector machine for prediction of enzyme subfamily classes. J Theor Biol 2007; 248: 546-51.
85. Joshi RR, Sekharan S. Characteristic peptides of protein secondary structural motifs. Protein Pept Lett 2010; 17: 1198-206.
86. Li S, Li H, Li M, Shyr Y, Xie L, Li Y. Improved prediction of lysine acetylation by support vector machines. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16: 977-83.
87. Lin ZH, Wang HL, Zhu B, Wang YQ, Lin Y, Wu YZ. Estimation of affinity of HLA-A*0201 restricted CTL Epitope based on the SCORE function. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16: 561-9.
88. Lu J, Niu B, Liu L, Lu WC, Cai YD. Prediction of small molecules' metabolic pathways based on functional group composition. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16: 969-76.
89. Nanni L, Lumini A. A further step toward an optimal ensemble of classifiers for peptide classification, a case study: HIV protease. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16: 163-7.
90. Shi MG, Huang DS, Li XL. A protein interaction network analysis for yeast integral membrane protein. Protein Pept Lett 2008; 15: 692-9.
91. Tian F, Lv F, Zhou P, Yang Q, Jalbout AF. Toward prediction of binding affinities between the MHC protein and its peptide ligands using quantitative structure-activity relationship approach. Protein Pept Lett 2008; 15: 1033-43.
92. Yang XY, Shi XH, Meng X, et al. Classification of transcription factors using protein primary structure. Protein Pept Lett 2010; 17: 899-908.
93. Huang T, Cui W, Hu L, Feng K, Li YX, Cai YD. Prediction of pharmacological and xenobiotic responses to drugs based on time course gene expression profiles. PLoS One 2009; 4: e8126.
94. Huang T, Shi XH, Wang P, et al. Analysis and prediction of the metabolic stability of proteins based on their sequential features, subcellular locations and interaction networks. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10972.
95. Bethune J, Wieland F, Moelleken J. COPI-mediated transport. J Membr Biol 2006; 211: 65-79.
96. Collins BM, McCoy AJ, Kent HM, Evans PR, Owen DJ. Molecular architecture and functional model of the endocytic AP2 complex. Cell 2002; 109: 523-35.
97. Kirchhausen T, Nathanson KL, Matsui W, et al. Structural and functional division into two domains of the large (100-to 115-kDa) chains of the clathrin-associated protein complex AP-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 2612-6.
98. Jang SB, Kim YG, Cho YS, Suh PG, Kim KH, Oh BH. Crystal structure of SEDL and its implications for a genetic disease spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia tarda. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 49863-9.
99. Follows ER, McPheat JC, Minshull C, et al. Study of the interaction of the medium chain mu 2 subunit of the clathrinassociated adapter protein complex 2 with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and CD28. Biochem J 2001; 359: 427-34.
100. Nakayama Y, Goebl M, O'Brine Greco B, Lemmon S, Pingchang CE, Kirchhausen T. The medium chains of the mammalian clathrin-associated proteins have a homolog in yeast. Eur J Biochem 1991; 202: 569-74.
101. Pawson T. Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature 1995; 373: 573-80.
102. Mayer BJ, Baltimore D. Signalling through SH2 and SH3 domains. Trends Cell Biol 1993; 3: 8-13.
103. Musacchio A, Gibson T, Lehto VP, Saraste M. SH3--an abundant protein domain in search of a function. FEBS Lett 1992; 307: 55-61.
104. Morton CJ, Campbell ID. SH3 domains. Molecular 'Velcro'. Curr Biol 1994; 4: 615-7.
105. Di Fiore PP, Pelicci PG, Sorkin A. EH: a novel protein-protein interaction domain potentially involved in intracellular sorting. Trends Biochem Sci 1997; 22: 411-3.
106. Reizer J, Finley K, Kakuda D, MacLeod CL, Reizer A, Saier MH Jr. Mammalian integral membrane receptors are homologous to facilitators and antiporters of yeast, fungi, and eubacteria. Protein Sci 1993; 2: 20-30.
107. Vandenbol M, Jauniaux JC, Grenson M. Nucleotide sequence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PUT4 proline-permease-encoding gene: similarities between CAN1, HIP1 and PUT4 permeases. Gene 1989; 83: 153-9.
108. Weber E, Chevallier MR, Jund R. Evolutionary relationship and secondary structure predictions in four transport proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Evol 1988; 27: 341-50.
109. Walmsley AR, Barrett MP, Bringaud F, Gould GW. Sugar transporters from bacteria, parasites and mammals: structureactivity relationships. Trends Biochem Sci 1998; 23: 476-81.
110. Pao SS, Paulsen IT, Saier MHJr. Major facilitator superfamily. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1998; 62: 1-34.
111. Peck J, Douglas GT, Wu CH, Burbelo PD. Human RhoGAP domain-containing proteins: structure, function and evolutionary relationships. FEBS Lett 2002; 528: 27-34.
112. Hayashida M, Maita T, Matsuda G. The primary structure of skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain: I. Sequence of the aminoterminal 23 kDa fragment. J Biochem 1991; 110: 54-9.
113. Freemont PS. The RING finger. A novel protein sequence motif related to the zinc finger. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 684: 174-92.
114. Borden KL, Freemont PS. The RING finger domain: a recent example of a sequence-structure family. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996; 6: 395-401.
115. Saurin AJ, Borden KL, Boddy MN, Freemont PS. Does this have a familiar RING? Trends Biochem Sci 1996; 21: 208-14.
116. Vázquez JM, Aguiar V, Seoane JA, et al. Star graphs of protein sequences and proteome mass spectra in cancer prediction. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 275-88.
117. Torrens F, Castellano G. Topological charge-transfer indices: From small molecules to proteins. Curr Proteomics 2009; 204-13.
118. Pérez-Montoto LG, Prado-Prado F, Ubeira FM, González-Díaz H. Study of parasitic infections, cancer, and other diseases with massspectrometry and quantitative proteome-disease relationships. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 246-61.
119. Ivanciuc O. Machine learning quantitative structure-activity relationships (qsar) for peptides binding to human amphiphysin-1 sh3 domain. Curr Proteomics 2009; 4: 289-302.
120. González-Díaz H, Prado-Prado F, Pérez-Montoto LG, Duardo-Sánchez A, López-Díaz A. QSAR models for proteins of parasitic organisms, plants and human guests: theory, applications, legal protection, taxes, and regulatory issues. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 214-27.
121. Giuliani A, Di Paola L, Setola R. Proteins as networks: a mesoscopic approach using haemoglobin molecule as case study. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 235-45.
122. Chou KC. Pseudo amino acid composition and its applications in bioinformatics, proteomics and system biology. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 262-74.
123. Chen J, Shen B. Computational analysis of amino acid mutation: a proteome wide perspective. Curr Proteomics 2009; 6: 228-34.
124. Gonzalez-Diaz H. Network topological indices, drug metabolism, and distribution. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 283-4.
125. Khan MT. Predictions of the ADMET properties of candidate drug molecules utilizing different QSAR/QSPR modelling approaches. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 285-95.
126. Mrabet Y, Semmar N. Mathematical methods to analysis of topology, functional variability and evolution of metabolic systems based on different decomposition concepts. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 315-41.
127. Martinez-Romero M, Vazquez-Naya JM, Rabunal JR, et al. Artificial intelligence techniques for colorectal cancer drug metabolism: ontology and complex network. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 347-68.
128. Zhong WZ, Zhan J, Kang P, Yamazaki S. Gender specific drug metabolism of PF-02341066 in rats--role of sulfoconjugation. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 296-306.
129. Wang JF, Chou KC. Molecular modeling of cytochrome P450 and drug metabolism. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 342-6.
130. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Duardo-Sanchez A, Ubeira FM, et al. Review of MARCH-INSIDE & complex networks prediction of drugs: ADMET, anti-parasite activity, metabolizing enzymes and cardiotoxicity proteome biomarkers. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 379-406.
131. Garcia I, Diop YF, Gomez G. QSAR & complex network study of the HMGR inhibitors structural diversity. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 307-14.
132. Chou KC. Graphic rule for drug metabolism systems. Curr Drug Metab 2010; 11: 369-78.
133. Speck-Planche A, Scotti MT, de Paulo-Emerenciano V. Current pharmaceutical design of antituberculosis drugs: future perspectives. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2656-65.
134. Garcia I, Fall Y, Gomez G. QSAR, docking, and CoMFA studies of GSK3 inhibitors. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2666-75.
135. Estrada E, Molina E, Nodarse D, Uriarte E. Structural contributions of substrates to their binding to P-Glycoprotein. A TOPS-MODE approach. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2676-2709.
136. Concu R, Podda G, Ubeira FM, Gonzalez-Diaz H. Review of QSAR models for enzyme classes of drug targets: Theoretical background and applications in parasites, hosts, and other organisms. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2710-23.
137. Vazquez-Naya JM, Martinez-Romero M, Porto-Pazos AB, et al. Ontologies of drug discovery and design for neurology, cardiology and oncology. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2724-36.
138. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Romaris F, Duardo-Sanchez A, et al. Predicting drugs and proteins in parasite infections with topological indices of complex networks: theoretical backgrounds, applications, and legal issues. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2737-64.
139. Marrero-Ponce Y, Casanola-Martin GM, Khan MT, Torrens F, Rescigno A, Abad C. Ligand-based computer-aided discovery of tyrosinase inhibitors. Applications of the TOMOCOMD-CARDD method to the elucidation of new compounds. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2601-24.
140. Roy K, Ghosh G. Exploring QSARs with Extended Topochemical Atom (ETA) indices for modeling chemical and drug toxicity. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2625-39.
141. Munteanu CR, Fernandez-Blanco E, Seoane JA, et al. Drug discovery and design for complex diseases through QSAR computational methods. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2640-55.
142. Gonzalez-Diaz H. QSAR and complex networks in pharmaceutical design, microbiology, parasitology, toxicology, cancer, and neurosciences. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2598-600.
143. Wang JF, Wei DQ, Chou KC. Pharmacogenomics and personalized use of drugs. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1573-9.
144. Wang JF, Wei DQ, Chou KC. Drug candidates from traditional chinese medicines. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1656-65.
145. Vilar S, Cozza G, Moro S. Medicinal chemistry and the molecular operating environment (MOE): application of QSAR and molecular docking to drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1555-72.
146. Ivanciuc O. Weka machine learning for predicting the phospholipidosis inducing potential. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1691-709.
147. Helguera AM, Combes RD, Gonzalez MP, Cordeiro MN. Applications of 2D descriptors in drug design: a DRAGON tale. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1628-55.
148. Gonzalez-Diaz H, Prado-Prado F, Ubeira FM. Predicting antimicrobial drugs and targets with the MARCH-INSIDE approach. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1676-90.
149. Gonzalez-Diaz H. Quantitative studies on Structure-Activity and Structure-Property Relationships (QSAR/QSPR). Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1554.
150. Gonzalez MP, Teran C, Saiz-Urra L, Teijeira M. Variable selection methods in QSAR: an overview. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1606-27.
151. Duardo-Sanchez A, Patlewicz G, Lopez-Diaz A. Current topics on software use in medicinal chemistry: intellectual property, taxes, and regulatory issues. Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1666-75.
152. Caballero J, Fernandez M. Artificial neural networks from MATLAB in medicinal chemistry. Bayesian-regularized genetic neural networks (BRGNN): application to the prediction of the antagonistic activity against human platelet thrombin receptor (PAR-1). Curr Top Med Chem 2008; 8: 1580-605.