Mathematical methods to analysis of topology, functional variability and evolution of metabolic systems based on different decomposition concepts

Current Drug Metabolism

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 315-341

  Mrabet, Yassine ^b   Semmar, Nabil ^a,b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b University Tunis El Manar   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Correlation analysis; Kinetic modelling; Metabolic pathways; Metabolic processes; Metabolic profiles; Multivariate analysis; Stoichiometric analysis; System decomposition

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOUND;

BOOTSTRAPPING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER MODEL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECOMPOSITION; EVOLUTION; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METABOLISM; METABOLITE; METABOLOMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STOICHIOMETRY;

EID: 77953311470     PISSN: 13892002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138920010791514333     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Ritschel, W.A.; Kearn, G.L. Handbook of Basic Pharmacokinetics, 5th ed.; American Pharmaceutical Association: Washington, D.C., 1999.
2. Atkinson, D.E. Cellular Energy Metabolism and its Regulation; Academic Press: New York, 1977.
3. Kacser, H; Burns, J.A. The control of flux. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., 1973, 27, 65-104.
4. Savageau, M.A. Biochemical Systems Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1976.
5. Hayashi, K.; Sakamoto, N. Dynamic Analysis of Enzyme Systems. An Introduction; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1986.
6. Fell, D.A. Understanding the Control of Metabolism. Portland Press, London, 1996.
7. Heinrich, R.; Schuster, S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems; Chapman & Hall: New York, 1996.
8. Papin, J.A.; Price, N.D.; Wiback, S.J.; Fell, D.A.; Palsson, B.O. Metabolic pathways in the post-genome era. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2003, 28, 250-258.
9. Oliver, S. G.; Winson, M.K.; Kell, D.B; Baganz, F. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol., 1998, 16, 373-378.
10. Roessner, U. ; Luedemann, A. ; Brust, D.; Fiehn, O. ; Linkeb, T. ; Willmitzer, L.; Fernie, A.R. Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell, 2001, 13, 11-29.
11. Nicholson, J.K.; Lindon, J.C.; Holmes, E. 'Metabonomics': understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica, 1999, 29, 1181-1189.
12. Kell, D.B. Metabolomics and machine learning: explanatory analysis of complex metabolome data using genetic programming to produce simple, robust rules. Mol. Biol. Rep., 2002, 29, 237-241.
13. Ott, K.H.; Aranibar, N.; Singh, B.; Stockton, G.W. Metabonomics classifies pathways affected by bioactive compounds. Artificial neural network classification of NMR spectra of plant extracts. Phytochemistry, 2003, 62, 971-985.
14. Weckwerth, W. Metabolomics in Systems Biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2003, 54, 669-689.
15. Goodacre, R.; Vaidynathan, S.; Dunn, W. B.; Harrigan, G.G.; Kell, D.B. Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol., 2004, 22, 245-252.
16. Sumner, L.W.; Mendes, P.; Dixon, R.A. Plant metabolomics: largescale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry, 2003, 62, 817-836.
17. Kell, D.B. Metabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2004, 7, 1-12.
18. Sweetlove, L. J.; Fernie, A.R. Regulation of metabolic networks: understanding metabolic complexity in the systems biology era. New Phytol., 2005, 168, 9-24.
19. Fernie, A.R.; Trethewey, R.N.; Krotzky, A.; Willmitzer, L. Metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2004, 5, 763-769.
20. Semmar, N.; Jay, M.; Chemli R. Chemical diversification trends in Astragalus caprinus (Leguminosae) based on the flavonoid pathway. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 2001, 29, 727-738.
21. Semmar, N.; Jay, M.; Farman, M.; Chemli, R. Chemotaxonomic analysis of Astragalus caprinus (Fabaceae) based on the flavonic patterns. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 2005, 33, 187-200.
22. Semmar, N.; Jay, M.; Nouira, S. A new approach to graphical and numerical analysis of links between plant chemotaxonomy and secondary metabolism from HPLC data smoothed by a simplex mixture design. Chemoecology, 2007, 17, 139-156.
23. Semmar, N.; Urien, S.; Bruguerolle, B.; Simon, N. Independent-model diagnostics for a priori identification and interpretation of outliers from a full pharmacokinetic database: correspondence analysis, Mahalanobis distance and Andrews curves. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn., 2008, 35, 159-183.
24. Semmar, N. A new mixture design-based approach to graphical screening of potential interconnections and variability processes in metabolic systems. Chem. Biol. Drug Des., 2010, 75, 91-105.
25. Denkert, C.; Budczies, J.; Weichert, W.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Scholz, M.; Kind, T.; Niesporek, S.; Noske, A.; Buckendahl, A.; Dietel, M.; Fiehn, O. Metabolite profiling of human colon carcinoma - deregulation of TCA cycle and amino acid turnover. Mol. Cancer, 2008, 7(72), 1-15.
26. Steuer, R. Review on the analysis and interpretation of correlations in metabolomic data. Brief. Bioinform., 2006, 7, 151-158.
27. Camacho, D.; de la Fuente, A.; Mendes, P. The origin of correlations in metabolomics data. Metabolomics, 2005, 1, 53-63.
28. Weckwerth, W.; Fiehn O. Can we discover novel pathways using metabolomic analysis? Curr. Opin. Biotech., 2002, 13, 156-160.
29. Llaneras, F.; Picó, J. Stoichiometric modelling of cell metabolism. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2008, 105, 1-11.
30. Morgan, J. A.; Rhodes, D. Mathematical modeling of plant metabolic pathways. Metab. Eng., 2002, 4, 80-89.
31. Stelling, J. Mathematical models in microbial systems biology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2004, 7, 513-518.
32. Schilling, C.H.; Edwards, J.S.; Letscher, D.; Palsson, B.Ø. Combining pathway analysis with flux balance analysis for the comprehensive study of metabolic systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2001, 71, 286-306.
33. Klamt, S.; Stelling, J. Two approaches for metabolic pathway analysis. Trends Biotechnol., 2003, 21, 64-69.
34. Papin, J.A.; Stelling, J.; Price N.D.; Klamt, S.; Schuster, S.; Palsson, B.O. Comparison of network-based pathway analysis methods. Trends Biotechnol., 2004, 22, 400-405.
35. Bailey, J.E.; Sburlati, A.; Hatzimanikatis, V.; Lee, K.; Renner, W.A.; Tsai, P.S. Inverse metabolic engineering: a strategy for directed genetic engineering of useful phenotype. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1996, 52, 109-121.
36. Lu, J.l.; Liao, C.L. Metabolic engineering and control analysis for production of aromatics: role of transaldolase. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1997, 53, 132-138.
37. Chang, Y.J.; Kim, B.R.; Kim, S.U. Metabolic flux analysis of diterpene biosynthesis pathway in rice. Biotech. Lett., 2005, 27, 1375-1380.
38. Yarmush, M.L.; Banta, S. Metabolic engineering: advances in modelling and intervention in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2003, 5, 349-381.
39. Fiehn, O. Metabolomics - the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol., 2002, 48, 155-171.
40. Bhalla, R.; Narasimhan, K. Metabolomics and its role in understanding cellular responses in plants. Plant Cell Rep., 2005, 24, 562-571.
41. Trethewey, R.N. Metabolite profiling as an aid to metabolic engineering in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2004, 7, 196-201.
42. Forster, J.; Gombert, K.A.; Nielsen, J. A functional genomics approach using metabolomics and in silico pathway analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2002, 79, 703-712.
43. Feala, J.D.; Coquin, L., Paternostro, G.; McCulloch, A.D. Integrating metabolomics and phenomics with systems models of cardiac hypoxia. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 2008, 96, 209-225.
44. Boroujerdi, M. Pharmacokinetics: Principle and Applications; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2002.
45. Shargel, L.; Yu, A.B.C. Applied Biopharmaceutics & Pharmacokinetics, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1999.
46. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed.; Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1999.
47. Legendre, P.; Legendre L. Numerical Ecology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2000.
48. Hofmeyr, J.H.; Kacser, H.; van der Merwe, K.J. Metabolic control analysis of moiety-conserved cycles. Eur. J. Biochem., 1986, 155, 631-641.
49. Kacser, H.; Burns, J.A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics, 1981, 97, 639-666.
50. Steuer, R.; Kurths, J.; Fiehn, O.; Weckwerth, W. Observing and interpreting correlations in metabolomic networks. Bioinformatics, 2003, 19, 1019-1026.
51. Numata, J.; Ebenhöh, O.; Knapp, E.W. Measuring correlations in metabolomic networks with mutual information. Genome Inform., 2008, 20, 112-122.
52. Cover, T.M.; Thomas, J.A. Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed.; Schilling, D.L., Ed. Wiley: USA, 2006.
53. Lindon, J.C.; Holmes, E.; Nicholson, J.K. In: The Handbook of Metabolomics and Metabonomics; Lindon, J.C.; Nicholson, J.K.; Holmes, E., Eds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 1-33.
54. Trygg, J.; Lundstedt, T. In: The Handbook of Metabolomics and Metabonomics; Lindon, J.C.; Nicholson, J.K.; Holmes, E., Eds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 171-199.
55. Palsson, B.O. Systems biology: properties of reconstructed networks; Cambridge University Press: New York, 2006.
56. Steuer, R. Computational approaches to the topology, stability and dynamics of metabolic networks. Phytochemistry, 2007, 68, 2139-2151.
57. Stephanopoulos, G.N.; Aristidou, A.A.; Nielsen, J. Metabolic engineering: principles and methodologies; Academic Press: San Diego, 1998.
58. Shimizu, H. Metabolic engineering: integrated methodology of moleculr breeding and bioprocess systems engineering. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2002, 94, 563-573.
59. Williams, T.C.R.; Miguet, L.; Masakapalli, S.K.; Kruger, N. J.; Sweetlove, L.J.; Ratcliffe, R.G. Metabolic network fluxes in heterotrophic arabidopsis cells: stability of the flux distribution under different oxygenation conditions. Plant Physiol., 2008, 148, 704-718.
60. Ettenhuber, C.; Radykewicz, T.; Kofer, W.; Koop, H.U.; Bacher, A.; Eisenreich, W. Metabolic flux analysis in complex isotopolog space. Recycling of glucose in tobacco plants. Phytochemistry, 2005, 66, 323-335.
61. Kruger, N.J.; Ratcliffe, R.G.; Roscher, A. Quantitative approaches for analysing fluxes through plant metabolic networks using NMR and stable isotope labelling. Phytochem. Rev., 2003, 2, 17-30.
62. Lee, K.; Berthiaume, F.; Stephanopoulos, G.N.; Yarmush, M.L. Metabolic flux analysis: a powerful tool for monitoring tissue function. Tissue Eng., 1999, 5, 347-368.
63. Buchholz, A.; Hurlebaus, J.; Wandrey, C.; Takors, R. Metabolomics: quantification of intracellular metabolite dynamics. Biomol. Eng., 2002, 19, 5-15.
64. Fell, D.A. In: Modern Trends in Biothermokinetics; Schuster, S.; Rigoulet, M.; Ouhabi, R.; Mazat, J.P. Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1993.
65. Schilling, C.H.; Palsson, B.O. The underlying pathway structure of biochemical reaction networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1998, 95, 4193-4198.
66. Niederberger, P.; Prasad, R.; Miozzari, G.; Kacser, H. A strategy for increasing an in vivo flux by genetic manipulations of the tryptophan system of yeast. Biochem. J., 1992, 287, 473-479.
67. Tavazoie, S.; Hughes, J.D.; Campbell, M.J.; Cho, R.J.; Church, G.M. Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nat. Genet., 1999, 22, 281-285.
68. Heinrich, R.; Rapoport, S.M. In: Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology; Butler, J.A.V.; Noble, D., Eds; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1997; vol. 32, pp. 1-82.
69. Fell, D.A. Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. Biochem. J., 1992, 286, 313-330.
70. Schuster, S.; Heinrich, R. The definitions of metabolic control analysis revisited. Biosystems, 1992, 27, 1-15.
71. Heinrich, R.; Rapoport, T.A. A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. Eur. J. Biochem., 1974, 42, 89-95.
72. Liao, J.C.; Delgado, J. Advances in metabolic control analysis. Biotechnol. Prog., 1993, 9, 221-233.
73. Schuster, S.; Hilgetag, C. On elementary flux modes in biochemical reaction systems at stedy-state. J. Biol. Syst., 1994, 2, 165-182.
74. Wiback, S.J.; Famili, I.; Greenberg, H.J.; Palsson, B.O. Monte Carlo sampling can be used to determine the size and shape of steady-state flux space. J. Theor. Biol., 2004, 228, 437-447.
75. Rockafellar, R.T. Convex Analysis; Princeton University Press: Princeton, 1996.
76. Schuster, S.; Fell, D.A.; Dandekar, T. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat. Biotechnol., 2000, 15, 296-303.
77. Provost, A.; Bastin, G. Dynamic metabolic modelling under the balanced growth condition. J. Process Controle, 2004, 14, 717-728.
78. Schilling, C.H.; Schuster, S.; Palsson, B.O.; Heinrich, R. Metabolic pathway analysis: basic concepts and scientific applications in the post-genomic era. Biotechnol. Progr., 1999, 15, 296-303.
79. Schilling, C.H.; Letscher, D; Palsson, B.Ø. Theory for the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. J. Theor. Biol., 2000, 203, 229-248.
80. Schuster, S.; Dandekar, T.; Fell, D.A. Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks: a promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering. Trends Biotechnol., 1999, 17, 53-60.
81. Edwards, J.S.; Palsson, B.Ø. How will bioinformatics influence metabolic engineering? Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1998, 58, 162-169.
82. Edwards, J.S.; Palsson, B. Properties of the Haemophilus influenzae Rd metabolic genotype. J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274, 17410-17416. (Pubitemid 129519083)
83. Edwards, J.S.; Palsson, B.Ø. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. USA, 2000, 97, 5528-5533.
84. Schilling, C.H.; Edwards, J.S.; Palsson, B.Ø. Towards metabolic phenomics: analysis of genomic data using flux balances. Biotechnol. Progr., 1999, 15, 288-295.
85. Edwards, J.S.; Covert, M.; Palsson, B. Metabolic modelling of microbes: the flux-balance approach. Environ. Microbiol., 2002, 4, 133-140.
86. Price, N.D.; Papin, J.A.; Schilling, C.H.; Palsson, B.O. Genomescale microbial in silico models: the constraints-based approach. Trends Biotechnol., 2003, 21, 162-169.
87. Beard, D.A.; Liang, S.D.; Qian, H. Energy balance for analysis of complex metabolic networks. Biophys. J., 2002, 83, 79-86. (Pubitemid 34694721)
88. Edwards, J.S.; Ibarra, R.U.; Palsson, B.O. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat. Biotechnol., 2001, 19, 125-130.
89. Kauffman, K.J.; Prakash, P.; Edwards, J.S. Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2003, 14, 491-496.
90. Greenacre, M.J. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis; Academic Press: London, 1984.
91. Greenacre, M.J. Correspondence analysis in practice; Academic Press: London, 1993.
92. Escofier, B.; Pagès,, J. In: Applied multivariate analysis in SAR and environmental studies; Devillers, J.; Karcher, W., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991; pp. 1-32.
93. Jain, A. K.; Murty, M. N.; Flynn, P. J. Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv., 1999, 31, 264-323.
94. Milligan, W. G.; Cooper, M. C. Methodology review: clustering methods. Appl. Psych Meas., 1987, 11, 329-354.
95. Everitt, B. S.; Landau, S.; Leese, M. Cluster Analysis; Arnold Publishers: London, 2001.
96. Gordon, A. D. Classification; CRC Pr I Llc: Boca Raton, 1999.
97. Arabie, P.; De Soete, G.; Arabie, P.; Hubert, L.J.; De Soete, G. Clustering and Classification; World Scientific Pub. Co. Inc.: River Edge, New Jersey, 1996.
98. Dimitriadou, E.; Barth, M.; Windischberger, C.; Hornik, K.; Moser, E. A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis. Artif. Intell. Med., 2004, 31,57-71.
99. Roux, M. In: Applied multivariate analysis in SAR and environmental studies; Devillers, J.; Karcher, W., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991; pp. 115-152.
100. Semmar, N.; Bruguerolle, B.; Boullu-Ciocca, S.; Simon, N. Cluster Analysis: An Alternative Method for Covariate Selection in Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn., 2005, 32, 333-358.
101. Scheffe, H. Experiments with mixtures. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 1958, 20, 344-360.
102. Scheffe, H. The simplex centroid design for experiments wth mixtures. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 1963, 25, 235-263.
103. Eide, I. Strategies for toxicological evaluation of mixtures. Food Chem. Toxicol., 1996, 34, 1147-1149.
104. Duineveld, C.A.A.; Smilde, A.K.; Doorhbos, D.A. Comparison of experimental designs combining process and mixture variables. Part I. Design construction and theoretical evaluation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 1993, 19, 295-308.
105. Duineveld, C.A.A.; Smilde, A.K.; Doorhbos, D.A. Comparison of experimental designs combining process and mixture variables. Part II. Design evaluation on measured data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 1993, 19, 309-318.
106. Welling, P.G. Pharmacokinetics. Processes, Mathematics and Applications, 2nd ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington D.C., 1997.
107. Winter, M.E. Basic Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 4th ed.; Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, 2004.
108. Rescigno, A. Fundamental concepts in pharmacokinetics. Pharmacol. Res., 1997, 35, 363-390.
109. Holz, M.; Fahr, A. Compartment modelling. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev., 2001, 48, 249-264.
110. Scheppard, C.W. The theory of transfers within a multicompartment system using isotopic tracers. J. Appl. Phys., 1948, 19, 70-76.
111. Kac, M. Some mathematical models in Science. Sci. N.Y., 1969, 166, 695-699.
112. Nooney, G.C. Mathematical models in medicine: a diagnosis. J. Chron. Dis., 1966, 19, 325-332.
113. Distefano, JJ.; Landaw, E.M. Multiexponential multicompartmental and noncompartmental modeling. I. Methodological limitations and physiological interpretations. Am. J. Physiol., 1984, 246 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 15), R651.
114. Teorell, T. Kinetics of distribution of substances administrated to the body. Arch. Intern. Pharmacodyn., 1937, 57, 205-240.
115. Balant, L.P.; Gex, F.M. Physiological pharmacokinetic modelling. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 1990, 8, 471-485.
116. Roth, W.L. ; Freeman, R.A. ; Wilson, A.G. A physiologically based model for gastrointestinal absorption and excretion of chemicals carried by lipids. Risk Anal., 1993, 13, 531-543.
117. Andersen, M.E. Physiological modelling of organic compounds. Ann. Occup. Hyg., 1991, 35, 309-321.
118. Bailer, A.J.; Daukovic, D.A. An introduction to the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in risk assessment. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 1997, 25, 313-348.
119. Aronsson, G.; Kellog, R.B. On a differential equation arising from compartment analysis. Math. Biosci., 1978, 38, 113-122.
120. Matis, J.H. In: Pharmacokinetics: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches to Metabolism and Distribution of Chemicals and Drugs; Pecile, A. & Rescigno, A., Eds.; Plennum Press: New York, 1988.
121. Chiang, C.L. An introduction to stochastic processes and their applications; Krieger, Huntington: New York, 1980.
122. Matis, J.H.; Wehrly, T.E. Generalized stochastic compartment models with Erlang transit times. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 1990, 18, 589-607.
123. Lansky, P. A stochastic model for circulatory transport in pharmacokinetics. Math. Biosci., 1996, 132, 141-167.
124. Matis, J.H.; Wehrly, T.E.; Metzler, C.M. On some stochastic formulation and related statistical moments of pharmaceutical models. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 1983, 11, 77-92.
125. Piotrovskii, V.K. Pharmacokinetic stochastic model with Weibulldistributed residence tiles of drug molecules in the body. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 1987, 32, 515-523.
126. Bonate, P.L. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation; Springer: New York, 2006.
127. Sprott, J.C. Chaos and time-series analysis; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2003.
128. Kaplan, D.; Glass, L. Understanding Nonlinear Dynamics; Springer- Verlag: New York, 1995.